C :: Including Source File Twice But With Include Guard
Jun 14, 2014
I have four source files. The main source file includes two other source files. The two other source files both include the fourth source file. In the fourth source file I have an include guard. Will the code from the fourth source file exist in two locations in the compiled code? Is this something that is compiler dependent? An example of this is shown in the code below.
I have a main.h file where I include all the needed things to make my program compile properly, string, vector etc.
And I also have another header file which comntains a class that is used later in the code (globally), I decided to keep it in another file to make it more clear and easier.
I need to include that file in main.h, but I also include main.h from that class header file because it contains some other includes that are required to compile.
Is this a good thing? Or should I keep main.h out of that class header file and include just things required for the class?
I may have complicated it too much, so I'll show an example, what I do now:
// ---- main.h ---- #include <string> #include <vector> #include <ctime> // other includes, these are just examples #include "MyClass.h" // the separated class header file
[Code] ......
So, from what you can see MyClass.h requires just including the vector, but to avoid repeating myself I include main.h which does that already, but also includes MyClass.h
So, I have two questions: 1. Is it ok to include in that way (including a file that includes the including file) 2. Is it good to include a main header file with all the includes even if I just need one of them, or should I skip including main.h and include just the things my class requires (vector is just an example)
I have the header (and accompanying lib file) in my project folder, I have it in my solution explorer. And I've tried to add it via C++ Directories.. but that doesn't seem to exist anymore, instead it points to a user property sheet, but where to find or access it ...
I am currently developing a small quick'n dirty SIP (Session Initiation Protocol) parser. Its task is to read a file (or command-line argument) with a SIP requst and parse it using the sofia-sip library. It should exit either with "1" on parsing failure or "0" on parsing success.
I have taken the code snipplet from here: [URL] .... resulting in this source code:
my programme showing error 'unable to open inclde file ****' i fallowed the general procedure i.e., options-->directories--> ( inclde proper path) still not working..
I wanted to share the value of a variable from Sender Program to Receive after program and want to calculate difference between send and receive. After studying Header file concept I program following three.
Now I am struck. How to to compile? I link all these file. I used following method:
Then I run Sender and after that Receiver.I per my knowledge, Receiver should give difference but it gives error :
Code: Receiver.c: In function "main": Receiver.c:10:42: error: "Send" undeclared (first use in this function) printf(" Total Receive is %d ",Receive-Send);
Code: Sender.c #include <stdio.h> int Send ; void main(){
My socket.cpp program got error. it showed "socket.h: no such file or directory". I had put my header file (socket.h) in the same place with my source file.
I was going through a code where i found the definition of int array[63] in one of the source files. But i also found the declaration as extern int array[66] in another source file. This is clearly wrong, but my doubt is how the compiler compiled it. It should have thrown error. In case if it compiles then what will be the behavior of the system? Will it be normal or some undefined behavior?
I use a programming language called layout which nobody here has probably ever heard of. It was discontinued over 15 years years ago but it was a very visual & easy to use piece of software - no coding required. In fact once you name all the variables on cards (forms) from then on it's just mouse clicking & occassionaly typing a number if required. It used blackboxes in a flowchart arrangement which were pre-done code for doing just about anything. i.e opening windows, handling numbers & text, files etc. I have written many programs with it including database management, quoting software & currently use it in my business to track my jobs & do invoicing & ordering. It's a pity it wasn't updated & still around today.
[URL]
Back to the problem. Being a 16 bit program it was written to run on Windows 3.1 but still works on Windows 7!! as long as it is the 32 bit version. I need to write a program that will run on 64 bit W7 without resorting to using a virtual PC solution. I have tried to find something similar that I might be able to use instead but so far nothing comes close to Layout. I just remembered today that layout can produce not only .exe programs but also various versions of C/C++ including visual c++. So I got this idea that if I could get those files I might be able to stick them into a C compiler program to re-make a "modern" exe file.
I could just do a simple sample program & send the source code to them to see if it works on a 64 bit version of Windows 7. how I can do this myself to produce a working exe file.
I have a project that has a few .asm files (assembly language code), I have the compiler/assembler set to create a list file for the assembly code and would like the debugger to use the .lst file for the source instead of the .asm files because in the .asm files the macros are not expanded like they are in the .lst files which makes debugging difficult sometimes.
I have written a program that copies a file from the source and pastes it there (same location), but with a different name. The program works fine, except there is a small bug that i can't seem to fix. Here is the code:
/* This program copies a file from the current directory and pastes it to the same directory, but with a different name. The file name form the source must include the extension as well. */
> 1) Enter the name of the file you'd like to copy (Must be from the current directory) > A: 3.c // This depends if the file exists in the > current directory > > 2) Enter the name of the destination file (The file will be copied to the same directory) > A: 4 //The extension isn't necessary here > > Result: The file was copied successfully!
When I run the prg again, and this time input a file name with no extension, like this:
> Enter the name of the file you'd like to copy (Must be from the current directory) > 3 > You did not enter a valid text. Press "?" to get help or "x" to exit.
I hit "?" and it takes me to
> 1. The file must be from the current directory) > 2. The location mustn't be empty
Then it asks me
> Try again? (Y/N)
If i give N, it exits. BUT if I give Y, it goes, like this:
> Enter the name of the file you'd like to copy (Must be from the current directory) > You did not enter a valid text. Press "?" to get help or "x" to exit.
You see, it doesn't give me the option to give it the file name..
I'm about to begin work on an exercise that requires me to maintain a list of the variables inside a c source file. I'm trying to figure out how I'm going to pluck out the variable names from all the other noise. My first thought would be to count any word that isn't a keyword or other type of grammar syntax, such as parenthesis, brackets, semicolons, etc. right?
Let's say I am using a library containing classes called class1 and class2 but both classes take three arguments to construct them. eg. class1(int a, int b, int c). and the same for class2
The below is an example of how to lay out the structure in the header and source file if class1 and class2 don't have any arguments in their constructor. But.... I'm not sure how to go about the below to take into account the constructor arguments of class1 and class2.
Is it possible to create a program like Robocode, a game controlled at runtime by an external source file in visual c ++? For example create a checkers game where there would be an external source file, read at runtime, which would play automatically, with artificial intelligence. You can? If yes, how?
I have a hpp file with a list of inline finctions like this:
Code: inline int check() { return 1; } inline int check_1() { return 1; }
... What I would like to do is to include them into several unrelated classes. How can I do this. Can I just add the hpp inline functions in headers of my class containing files or not. I mean if they are not defined as class functions how can they be called. I don't understan the logic.
When I attempt to compile the above code, I get several thousand errors, mostly "stray ‘@’ in program", coming from the cocoa framework. It compiles and runs correctly if I omit the cocoa include or if I name the file main.mm instead of main.cpp.
I'm pretty sure it's failing because cocoa is written in objective c and I'm reading it as c++ code..how to include an objective c file in a c++ program?
I am trying to include all repetitions for just one turn but I keep getting
00.0 but I want (the one in red) 170.3 0 0.3 180.0 17 0.0 190.3 18 0.0 200.3 19 0.3 210.0 20 0.3 220.0 21 0.0 22 0.0
so basically I call a function that represents just one turn of getting a random number, and then when the player decides he wants to get a random number that is at least 17 and wants to repeat this 3x I have to print out this chart that shows the chances of the player rolling the numbers between 17-22 [how many times does he get 0,17,18,19,20,21,22] this is what I have
cout << "your score: " << (' ') << "chances for that score:" << endl; /* score is the player's total score for the one turn */ int score = 0; int score0 = 0; // 0
I've worked a lot in Java and Perl and now I'm learning C++ and working on a simple e-reader (let's not get into why I'm not just using Kindle or other existing ones). This is for me and a number of friends.
At first my project will be on OS X, then Windows and Linux, and I hope to eventually use it on Android and iOS. I know that the last two will require separate GUIs, but I'm hoping the rest of the code will port easily.
Here's the problem:
I'm using Poppler to read and display PDF files. I started installing it on my iMac and it needs FontConfig, which is turning out to be a difficult install. I would not want to walk others through this or make them have to install Poppler and FontConfig (and any other libraries I find both need).
I thought I could just compile my final binaries using "-static" but I've been reading about how some libraries can't be statically linked or compiled.
Also, since I want to eventually port this to 4 other OSes (and apparently Poppler can work on those target OSes), I don't want to do something now or depend on something that will make it hard or impossible to port to other OSes later.
With that in mind, here are my questions:
1) Why is it some libraries cannot be compiled statically? How do I know if I'm dealing with one of those libraries?
2) Am I right that I could compile this program statically, and the resulting binary would include code from Poppler and FontConfig and other libraries would be included in the resulting executable binary?
3) What do I need to watch for so I can tell if using a particular library will be a problem when I need to port my program to a new OS? (Assuming, of course, that searching shows that library will compile or has been ported to that OS.)
I have two report.h files located in two different directories. However the contents of them are different. How can I include the report.h file located in guarddog into the report.h file located in sky?
