I am new to c++ and trying to learn. for instance. i have a struct and method.I am trying to learn what i can do with the method if i define the return type as struct type.
struct S { int age; string name; }; S method() { //what i can do in here. with the Struct. I mean can i reach members of the struct. etc }
test.cpp: In function ‘int main()’: test.cpp:20:30: error: no matching function for call to ‘func1(std::vector<int>&)’ test.cpp:20:30: note: candidate is: test.cpp:8:45: note: template<class T, class U> std::map<T, T> func1(U) test.cpp:8:45: note: template argument deduction/substitution failed: test.cpp:20:30: note: couldn't deduce template parameter ‘T’
I'm writing some functions pertaining to binary trees. I've used recursion once before while learning quicksort but am still quite new and unfamiliar with it. And this is my first time touching a binary tree. So my question: In my addnode function, will the return root statement at the end ever return a value other than the value passed to the function?
/** This class build the singleton design pattern. Here you have full control over construction and deconstruction of the object. */ template<class T> class Singleton
[Code]....
I am getting error at the assertion points when i call to the class as follows:
We're assigned a project working with classes and fractions. My goal is to display a fraction in proper from based on 2 arguments passed to a class member function proper();
My strategy was to utilize the greatest common factor between the 2 arguements, then divide both the numerator and denominator by that number and then it would display.
The program actually runs, but only seems to divide the numerator and not the denominator. This in return makes my other class member functions have incorrect comparisons and sums.
Code: #include<iostream> #include<conio.h> class Fraction { friend void compare(Fraction a, Fraction b); friend void sum(Fraction a, Fraction b);
I am supposed to update the value temp without using a return statement, or a global variable. I have never ran across a problem like this before and I am totally stuck. I think I'm missing something really simple and need a hint. Here is the code that was provided for "fixing".
#include "stdafx.h" #include <iostream> #include <cstdlib> using namespace std;
In here, T can be from the class CMesh * or CSkinnedMesh *, both have signature of GetAnimController
This maybe a flaw in my design... But I want Create to accept any kinds of meshes.
Should I create an interface or abstract class above all of those?
I have added an IMesh class that every derived classes has to have the needed interface.
But since then, I have another question, I feel that it is very cumbersome to include a template argument in every class/prototype that is associated with CObject
Say bool CreatePlanesFromObject(CObject *pObject, D3DXPLANE *pPlanes); Requires me to do this template<class T> bool CreatePlanesFromObject(CObject<T>* pObject, D3DXPLANE* pPlanes);
Any ways I can omit the template argument, because it doesn't make sense to know the Mesh type in other classes...
I have been experimenting with variadic templates with the aim of caching a call to a class method by storing away the object pointer, method pointer and parameters. I've actually had some reasonable success but have now hit a stumbling block. I now wish to wrap my parameters in a simple template class when I cache them. My success is as follows:
Using variadic template functions to store these pointers and paremeters;
I'm able to pass a method pointer and unwrapped parametersI'm able to pass wrapped parameters on their own.I'm NOT able to pass a method pointer and wrapped parameters I set up a little prototype project to demonstrate the issue and added comments above the function calls to indicate the compilation results. Here is the code:
Code: #include "stdafx.h" ////////////////////////////////////////////////// // Basic class with a simple method ////////////////////////////////////////////////// class MyClass { public: char Method( int i, float f ) { return 'A';
[code]....
But I'm convinced it should take three arguments, the method pointer and two wrapped parameters. Visual studio even suggested it should as shown below:
This week we are learning to use templates, and I don't understand how to call my member functions with my template based class. I tried the standard convention of calling member functions, but I keep getting an error saying name following"::" must be a class or namespace name. I'm thinking my problem lies with my typename T, but I am unsure. Line 16 is where I am getting tripped up.
#include "stdafx.h" #include <iostream> #include <string> using namespace std; template<class T> T Set { public:
I got base class called Statistic and inherited classes from it : lsp, cpu, memory. Those methods inheriting some of methods from Statistic and implement also theirself methods. I prepared some new class called ExecuteRequest which is taking Statistic object in the constructor. What i want to achieve is after i put e.g LSP to this class i would like to determinate what specific object it is in this case LSP right? Then having that i would like to put this object to RunRequest method. How can i achieve that? See my code below:
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; using System.Text; namespace SOAP_testing { public class ExecuteRequest
Is there a way to use preprocessing to conditionally return different types in a template. More specifically, is there a way to use preprocessing to block out conditional parts of code for one type verse another?
Example of what I can't get to compile for anything but POD types:
If I switch string to long, the implied conversions let it work. I'm imagining there might be some preprocessing way to hide irrelevant conditions. I mean, this code would cause an error to return a string when T=double, so I get why there is a compiler error. However, is there a way to make that part of the code get hidden in that case when the template is processed when T=double?
I am posting this simplified piece of code that is a bit confusing for me. There are two functions that I call. One shows the expected results but the result of the other one rather puzzles me.
Calling the function sum1 does not change the values stored in the variables val1 and val2. The output of the program is as follows:
val1= 1 ## val2= 10 // before the call of function sum1 val1= 1 ## val2= 10 // after the call of function sum1 sumOfVals= 22
This is quite obvious and as expected and I just pasted this piece of code as an example for better clarification.
However, if I call the function buildLaplacianPyramid and apply a function for Gaussian Blurring, this also effects the cv::Mat passed to the function. The line imshow("M1, after buildLaplacianPyramid",M1); therefore shows an image that is blurred. Since I am not passing a pointer to the cv::Mat I do not understand why this should be happening. I was assuming that there would be a copy of the cv::Mat M1 to be used within the function. Therefore I was expecting the cv::Mat M1 to retain its original value. I was expecting that all changes applied to cv::Mat inputmat within the function would not have any influence on the cv::Mat M1. Just like in my other example with the sum.
