C++ :: Nested / Recursive Template Specialization
Feb 11, 2014
I'm trying to write some naive binary serialization code and wanted to cut down on repetition of logic for serializing/deserializing nested vectors or other STL containers to reduce the chance of typos etc, and thought templates might hold a solution for me.
Code:
template <typename T> void serializeField(IWriter& writer, const T& val) {
writer.write((char*)&val, sizeof(T));
}
template<typename U, typename V>
template <> void serializeField(IWriter& writer, const U<V>& collection)
[Code] ....
Is there a way to do something like this? It isn't a big deal for me to just manually write code to serialize my vectors to the needed depth, but it sure would be nice to get this working.
View 10 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
May 27, 2013
I have a generic template class with another template in one of its types. Now I want to specialize one of its methods for a particular (template) class, which leads to a compile error, however.
Here is the example:
#include <stdio.h>
template<typename Type>
class Obj1 {
public:
void ID() { printf("Object 1, size = %zu
[Code] .....
GCC ends with:
:35:27: error: type/value mismatch at argument 2 in template parameter list for ‘template<class Type, template<class> class O> class Foo’
:35:27: error: expected a class template, got ‘Obj2<Type>’
What is wrong with the specialization? Can it even be achieved and how (if so)?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 17, 2013
[URL]
#include <iostream>
struct Outer {
template<typename T>
void go() {
std::cout << Test<T>::f() << std::endl;
[Code] .....
I have tried several variants on this code to no avail. Outer is in a header, along with the extern template statements, and the specializations after main are in their own cpp file. Main is in a different cpp file.
What do have to do to make this work? I cannot bring the definitions of f() into the header, and they will be different for different template parameters. Ideally, I want Test to remain a private member of Outer, though this can change if it's the only option.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 20, 2013
I've been trying to create a templated class that takes a template as a parameter. I'd like to specialise this class for certain partial specializations of the template parameter but can't seem to figure out how to do it nor find anything online, (although I may be searching for the wrong thing).
As an example, say I have a class A that takes a template class with two parameters as its parameter:
template< template<class X, class Y> class Z > class A {};
I'd like to have a general version of A, for a general version of Z, but a specialisation of A for a specialisation of Z, e.g. where X is int but Y is still any type.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Nov 18, 2013
[URL]
#include <iostream>
#include <type_traits>
template<typename T, typename = void>
struct Test {
static int constexpr value = 1;
[Code] .....
Why does it output 1 instead of 2? How can I make it output 2 and still output 1 for e.g. Test<double>::value?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 8, 2012
I'm trying to get template specializations working for char * as well as for char[]. I.e. in the following code the last test does not use the specialization and fails:
Code:
#include <string>
#include <iostream>
#include <cstring>
template<typename T1, typename T2>
bool compare(const T1& lhs, const T2& rhs) {
[Code] ....
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 15, 2013
I want to write a template that combines two type of resources:
class someClasses {
typedef someType ElementType;
} template<class T1,class T2>
class combo {
...
}
And I want to specify my T1 and T2 has the same ElementType, how can I write my combo class to partial specialize the general case so the ElementType check is at compile time?
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jan 21, 2013
I want to specialize a particular function for Integer datatype inside a class template. My XX.h will be
namespace ZZ {
template <class T>
class XX {
void doSomething(T x);
};
}
provide me XX.cpp which has template specialization for the function doSomething on Integer datatype.
I tried the following in XX.cpp
#include "XX.h"
using namespace ZZ;
template <class T>
void XX<T>::doSomething(T x) {
[Code] ...
But this code is not working.
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 23, 2014
Can you take a look why I am getting compile error.
Code:
// clang++ main.cpp -g -std=c++11 -o main
#include <iostream>
class QuoteClass {
public:
QuoteClass() = default;
QuoteClass(std::string param) {symbol = param;}
std::string get_symbol() {return symbol;}
[Code] ....
View 5 Replies
View Related
Sep 12, 2012
This code snippet just won't compile in a conforming compiler:
Code:
template<> struct series<0.0, 0, 0>
Because of the floating point template parameter.... If this "specialization" is useful, how come MS would have discarded it?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 9, 2013
Consider the following program below, which compiles without a hitch on MinGW GCC 4.8.1:
template <typename T>
class Outer {
class Nested1 {};
template <typename U>
class Nested2
[Code] .....
Is there any way I can move the definition of func outside of the class?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 7, 2014
How to initialize a static member of a class with template, which type is related to a nested class?
This code works (without nested class):
#include<iostream>
using namespace std;
struct B{
B(){cout<<"here"<<endl;}
};
template<typename Z>
[Code] ,....
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 28, 2014
let me jump straight to main() and my current output:
struct Base {};
struct A : Base { A() {std::cout << "A";} };
struct B : Base { B() {std::cout << "B";} };
struct C : Base { C() {std::cout << "C";} };
struct D : Base { D() {std::cout << "D";} };
[code]...
View 10 Replies
View Related
Apr 3, 2014
I wrote this code, and everything was working well, but part of the assignment is that it must include nested loops. Once I added the nested while loop, which is basically an if statement, my life was ruined. I am trying to nest a loop in the code that will basically tell the compiler that if the value "loopVol" were to exceed the value of "final" after adding an increment, to run the program for the "final". How can I do that?
Example:
initial = 10
final = 123
increment = 10
as of now, the program would stop at 120, but I want to nest a loop that will tell the compiler to calculate at the final if this happens.
#include <iostream>
#include <iomanip>
#include <stdio.h>
[Code]......
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 31, 2013
I am porting code from windows using visual studio to mac with xcode.
Quite a lot of issue have a appeared, which is no surprise, one warning that keeps on appearing is Explicit Specialiszation cannot have a storage class:
enum SortReturnCodeEnum {LOWEST=1, HIGHEST=2, HIGHLOW = 3, IDENTICAL=4};
template<typename tKey>
static SortReturnCodeEnum DefaultCompare(typename ArgType<tKey>::ARGT Value1, typename ArgType<tKey>::ARGT Value2)
{
[Code]....
I could do a #define __GNUC__ but i was checking
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 5, 2013
I'm trying to implement a simple template array class, but when i came into the operator< i actually have to use a template :
my code is something like :
template<typename _Type, std::size_t _Size>
class array {
public :
[Code] ......
but i am having an error of shadows template param 'class _Type' is it w/ the name conflict between the array template parameter and the function template parameter ?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Nov 6, 2013
Error1error C2955: 'DoubleLinkedListInterface' : use of class template requires template argument listdoublelinkedlist.h10
Error2error C2244: 'DoubleLinkedList<T>::DoubleLinkedList' : unable to match function definition to an existing declaration doublelinkedlist.cpp7
Error3 .cpperror C2244: 'DoubleLinkedList<T>::~DoubleLinkedList' : unable to match function definition to an existing declaration 12
.h
#pragma once
#include "DoubleLinkedListInterface.h"
#include "Node.h"
#include <iostream>
[Code]....
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 2, 2014
how I want the code to look. Only problem is it doesn't work (Line 11). I have some experience with templates but I'm not a pro.
Basically I want the "Channels<3>" to be a type that I can use to specify a Cable with similar to vector<float/int> it would be Cable<Channels<2 or 3>>.
What have I messed up with the syntax?
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
using namespace std;
[Code].....
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 14, 2014
I have a function:
template<class Iterator, class T>
void a(Iterator, Iterator, const T&);
and I want to be able to simplify calls to 'a' with calls like
a(someIteratableContainer);
instead of having to call:
a(someIteratableContainer.begin(), someIteratableContainer.end(), valueOfTheContainersElementType);
I also want to be able to generalize the function to handle any of the standard iteratable contains: array, vector, deque, whatever.
I was under the impression I could write:
template<template<class T> class U> a(U<T>& container) {
a(container.begin(), container.end(), g(T()));
}
where 'g()' returns an object of the element type. However, the compiler is claiming, no matter how I write a call to the overload, the original template is selected and/or the overload is invalid, depending on the various ways I attempt to write said overload.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Dec 11, 2014
I have been trying to get a hang on templates. I have the two following functions that that could be consolidated in a single template function:
void Attractor::updateFamilies(FamiliesController *_tmp, int _counter){
center.x = ofGetWidth()/2;
center.y = ofGetHeight()/3;
attractorCounter = _counter;
if(attractorCounter == 1){
[Code] .....
NotesController and FamiliesController have the same parent. The thing that I'm trying to grasp with templates is that is could something like:
template<class TYPE>
void Attractor::updateData(TYPE* *_tmp, int _counter){
center.x = ofGetWidth()/2;
center.y = ofGetHeight()/3;
attractorCounter = _counter;
[Code] ....
And then have another template function declaration for all the attractor functions where I pass the same template value as in the first one.
As you can see, I'm calling another functions inside called attractors(_tmp). I know that one way around it could be to get rid of that function and just do all the logic inside of each if statement. Is there any way to pass the same template function parameter within a template function parameter?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 9, 2015
I have a class like this
PHP Code:
template<class X>
class A {
X m_x;
public:
X* foo();
X* bar();
//others are not related to X
};
I would like to get rid of
PHP Code: template<class X>
For class level but still use it for members. Like this
PHP Code:
class A {
X m_x;
public:
template<class X>
X* foo();
template<class X>
X* bar();
//others are not related to X
};
However, I am still stuck at
PHP Code: X m_x;
View 6 Replies
View Related
Oct 12, 2013
Let me put it into the code snippet:
/**
This class build the singleton design pattern.
Here you have full control over construction and deconstruction of the object.
*/
template<class T>
class Singleton
[Code]....
I am getting error at the assertion points when i call to the class as follows:
osgOpenCL::Context *cxt = osgOpenCL::Singleton<osgOpenCL::Context>::getPtr();
I tried commenting assertion statements and then the debugger just exits at the point where getPtr() is called.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Aug 29, 2014
Given:
#include <string>
template <class T>
class basic_container{
[Code] .....
is this possible:
#include "../basic_container/basic_container.hpp"
template <class T>
class container_vector{
[Code] .....
If not, what do I need to do to achieve my goal?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 1, 2013
What output would you expect from this program?" The output was not what I expected. I've psuedo-coded this out and I'm still missing something.
Code:
#include <stdio.h>
int main () {
int numbers[10] = { 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 };
int i, j;
}
[code]....
The output: Code: 1 1 2 4 8 16 32 64 128 256 So when I look at this first loop I see that j = 0, which is less than 10, so then the program statement should commence, which is another for loop. So in this inner for loop I see that i = 0, which is not less than j, so this loop should terminate. Then the value of j increments by 1 and the first go around of the loop has completed.
Now I see that j = 1, so this is less than 10, and the inner for loop commences once again. This time though, i actually is less than j, so numbers[1] = numbers[1] + numbers [0], or numbers[1] = 0 + 1. Now the value of i is incremented by 1 and the first go around of this inner loop has completed. Then the value of j increments by 1 and another go around of that loop has completed.
So now j = 2, i = 1, and numbers[2] ( which is 0 ) = numbers[2] + numbers[1], or numbers[2] = 0 + 1. I was expecting the output to be an array full of 1's. However this is not the case..
View 6 Replies
View Related
May 21, 2013
here is a nested stl map
typedef struct struct_RISCP {
float nSCPTotal;
int nSCPCount;
CString strIMEI;
std::map<UINT8, int> mapSection;
}RISCPSt;
map<stRncCellIdntyDmnType, RISCPSt>m_mapRISCP;
it occupied too much memory,i wanted to clear them(both outer map and inner map) ,some one told me you just need to call m_mapRISCP.clear(),then the mapSection (inner map) will be cleared automaticly,in other words, m_mapRISCP.clear() will clear both outer map and inner map.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Mar 12, 2014
I'm working on a project involving nested classes and structs like this:
Code: class A {
public:class B {
public:f()
{A::C* iCanDoThis; //no errors.
iCanAlsoDoThis->root->.... //this also works fine.}private:A::C* iCannotDoThis //this is what I would like to do.
Has errors
A* iCanAlsoDoThis;};private:struct C
{..data..};
C* root;};
Is it possible make a pointer to struct C a private member of class B?
View 1 Replies
View Related
