C++ :: Use Of Class Template Requires Template Argument List
Nov 6, 2013
Error1error C2955: 'DoubleLinkedListInterface' : use of class template requires template argument listdoublelinkedlist.h10
Error2error C2244: 'DoubleLinkedList<T>::DoubleLinkedList' : unable to match function definition to an existing declaration doublelinkedlist.cpp7
Error3 .cpperror C2244: 'DoubleLinkedList<T>::~DoubleLinkedList' : unable to match function definition to an existing declaration 12
.h
#pragma once
#include "DoubleLinkedListInterface.h"
#include "Node.h"
#include <iostream>
Code: /data/data/com.n0n3m4.droidc/files/temp.c:92:3: error: invalid use of template-name 'Array' without an argument list Array::Array(int s): size(s) ^ compilation terminated due to -Wfatal-errors.
Code:
// headers #include <iostream> #include <utility> #include <cctype> // stuff we need from namespace std using std::cout; using std::cin;
Based on the arguments passed to foo, the compiler can deduct the type T. But on the other hand, when we use a class template, we always need to specify the type, for example,
Code: template<class T> struct sum { static void foo(T t1, T t2) { } }; sum<int>::foo(1,3);
Here we can't call sum::foo(1,3), otherwise we get compiler errors. My question is why the compiler can't deduct the type based on the arguments passed to foo? In addition, if we call function template foo like this,
Code: foo(1, '3');
Then we get compiler errors. We need to specify the type like foo<int>(1.'3'). Since '3' can be always treated as integer, why we need to specify the type here?
I have in the past written code for templated functions where one function argument can be either a function pointer or a Functor. Works pretty straightforward.
Now I am in a situation where I am actually trying to pass a function pointer as template argument to a class. Unfortunately this does not work, I can pass the Functor class but not the function pointer. Below code illustrates the issue:
The idea is to have the definition of the Record class simple and readable and have a maintainable way to add auto-conversion functions to the class. So the lines I commented out are the desirable way how I want my code to look. Unfortunately I could not come up with any way that was close to readable for solving this.
I'm trying to implement a simple template array class, but when i came into the operator< i actually have to use a template :
my code is something like :
template<typename _Type, std::size_t _Size> class array { public :
[Code] ......
but i am having an error of shadows template param 'class _Type' is it w/ the name conflict between the array template parameter and the function template parameter ?
I have a generic template class with another template in one of its types. Now I want to specialize one of its methods for a particular (template) class, which leads to a compile error, however.
GCC ends with: :35:27: error: type/value mismatch at argument 2 in template parameter list for ‘template<class Type, template<class> class O> class Foo’ :35:27: error: expected a class template, got ‘Obj2<Type>’
What is wrong with the specialization? Can it even be achieved and how (if so)?
how I want the code to look. Only problem is it doesn't work (Line 11). I have some experience with templates but I'm not a pro.
Basically I want the "Channels<3>" to be a type that I can use to specify a Cable with similar to vector<float/int> it would be Cable<Channels<2 or 3>>.
What have I messed up with the syntax?
#include <iostream> #include <vector> using namespace std;
I wrote this menu-driven program that maintains a list of restaurants. The program runs fine as it is right now, but my problem is I need to create a new array template class to maintain the list of restaurants, and when a new restaurant is added it must be created dynamically.
I'm having a hard time figuring out what exactly I need to do for this. Templates confuse me allot and I've read all the sections on templates here and in my book, but i'm still lost. The dynamic memory part is throwing me off as well.
/** This class build the singleton design pattern. Here you have full control over construction and deconstruction of the object. */ template<class T> class Singleton
[Code]....
I am getting error at the assertion points when i call to the class as follows:
I wonder if it is possible to remove the last argument in an argument pack? Below is an example on what I want to accomplish:
template<template<int...> class A,int... Ints> A<remove_last_int<Ints...>::list> func(const A<Ints...> & a0) { A<remove_last_int<Ints...>::list> a; ... //Here a set the members of a based on a0. ... return a; }
For example, I want the return a A<1,2> value from (const A<1,2,3> & a0)
Write a template that accepts an argument and returns its absolute value. The absolute entered by the user, then return the total. The argument sent into the function should be the number of values the function is to read. Test the template in a simple driver program that sends values of various types as arguments and displays the results.
#include <iostream> using namespace std; template <class integertemplate> integertemplate totalint (integertemplate integers) { cout << "How many integer values do you wish to total? "; cin >> integers;
where 'g()' returns an object of the element type. However, the compiler is claiming, no matter how I write a call to the overload, the original template is selected and/or the overload is invalid, depending on the various ways I attempt to write said overload.
I have tried several variants on this code to no avail. Outer is in a header, along with the extern template statements, and the specializations after main are in their own cpp file. Main is in a different cpp file.
What do have to do to make this work? I cannot bring the definitions of f() into the header, and they will be different for different template parameters. Ideally, I want Test to remain a private member of Outer, though this can change if it's the only option.
And then have another template function declaration for all the attractor functions where I pass the same template value as in the first one.
As you can see, I'm calling another functions inside called attractors(_tmp). I know that one way around it could be to get rid of that function and just do all the logic inside of each if statement. Is there any way to pass the same template function parameter within a template function parameter?
I have a linklist program I've written that seems to work just fine at least, it outputs the right information. However when it comes to the end and says press any key to continue, it crashes when I press a key says debug assertion error rather than just exiting. I haven't gone back and put in comments yet, I know I need to get used to commenting as I go />/>
#ifndef LIST_H #define LIST_H #include <iostream> #include <cstdlib> using namespace std; template <class T> class LinkList {
[Code] ....
Another bit of information. It was working without crashing when I only had the intlist functions called. When I added the doublelist is when I began getting the error however now if I remove the doubelist and go back to just having the intlist calls it still gives the error.
I have been trying to implement a way to remove a post from a list of posts implemented with a template doubly linked list. I have thought that the best way to do this might by operator overloading, but I have digressed. I have just thought of using a isEqual that checks equality, but when trying to implement i'm getting weird errors.
This is within my class wall, which is a linked list of wall posts, getPostInfo is within the class WallPost.
bool isEqual(WallPost const & a, WallPost const & b) { if(a.getPostInfo() == b.getPostInfo()) return true; else return false; }
I have several instances of the error "void illegal with all types" on line 3. It also is complaining about a not being a arithmetic, unscoped enum, or pointer type. I am assuming that it is because my getPostInfo function is a void.
I have made a Template Class that I named ArrayList(to coincide with ArrayLists in Java)and it works for the primitive types string, int, double, etc.; however, when I try making the ArrayList with a class object instead of a primitive type it gives:
"error C2512: 'ArrayList<Missile>::listCell' : no appropriate default constructor available"
And I am not sure why. My ArrayList Class is defined by:
template <class type> class ArrayList{ struct listCell{ type dataStorage; listCell *next = nullptr;
[Code] ....
The error takes place in the add method of the ArrayList class:
void add(type toAdd){ size++; if (head == nullptr){ head = new listCell(); head->dataStorage = toAdd;
[Code] ....
only when I use a class object instead of a primitive storage type.
The class "Missile" has been defined and compiles successfully, and the code calling the add method is here:
ArrayList<Missile> missiles; Missile *missile; //Constructor and Deconstructor not shown void fire(){ missile = new Missile(xPos, yPos, true); missiles.add((*missile)); }
I'm doing a homework aasignment on templates, and i have to build a list. The problem starts when i am trying to add elements to the list. For instance if i chose to add 5 different elements (1,2,3,4,5) the output will be (5,5,5,5,5).
std::cout << "Hello C++ programmers!" << std::endl;
I am trying to create a LinkedList (and then, an ADT stack; // yes, I cannot use the STL stack because the teacher won't let me), and I am getting some weird error when I create a ListNode and declare LinkedList (which has the ListNodes!) a friend of it.
I have tried forward-declaring LinkedList in the ListNode.h file, but I get this error:
error: 'ListNode' does not name a type
Are there any other possible solutions to this problem; // without having to resort to crazy stuff like having a .h file #include a .cpp file, or even declaring and defining ALL OF MY CODE in the .h files???
I have this class templates And This UML.I have to write this function +operator=(source: Array<ElemType, SIZE>): Array<ElemType, SIZE> but I do not know how to start the declaration / or start the function. I have to return a template but I do not know how to do it,
