I'm trying to get template specializations working for char * as well as for char[]. I.e. in the following code the last test does not use the specialization and fails:
Code:
#include <string>
#include <iostream>
#include <cstring>
template<typename T1, typename T2>
bool compare(const T1& lhs, const T2& rhs) {
[Code] ....
I have a generic template class with another template in one of its types. Now I want to specialize one of its methods for a particular (template) class, which leads to a compile error, however.
Here is the example:
#include <stdio.h>
template<typename Type>
class Obj1 {
public:
void ID() { printf("Object 1, size = %zu
[Code] .....
GCC ends with:
:35:27: error: type/value mismatch at argument 2 in template parameter list for ‘template<class Type, template<class> class O> class Foo’
:35:27: error: expected a class template, got ‘Obj2<Type>’
What is wrong with the specialization? Can it even be achieved and how (if so)?
[URL]
#include <iostream>
struct Outer {
template<typename T>
void go() {
std::cout << Test<T>::f() << std::endl;
[Code] .....
I have tried several variants on this code to no avail. Outer is in a header, along with the extern template statements, and the specializations after main are in their own cpp file. Main is in a different cpp file.
What do have to do to make this work? I cannot bring the definitions of f() into the header, and they will be different for different template parameters. Ideally, I want Test to remain a private member of Outer, though this can change if it's the only option.
I'm trying to write some naive binary serialization code and wanted to cut down on repetition of logic for serializing/deserializing nested vectors or other STL containers to reduce the chance of typos etc, and thought templates might hold a solution for me.
Code:
template <typename T> void serializeField(IWriter& writer, const T& val) {
writer.write((char*)&val, sizeof(T));
}
template<typename U, typename V>
template <> void serializeField(IWriter& writer, const U<V>& collection)
[Code] ....
Is there a way to do something like this? It isn't a big deal for me to just manually write code to serialize my vectors to the needed depth, but it sure would be nice to get this working.
I've been trying to create a templated class that takes a template as a parameter. I'd like to specialise this class for certain partial specializations of the template parameter but can't seem to figure out how to do it nor find anything online, (although I may be searching for the wrong thing).
As an example, say I have a class A that takes a template class with two parameters as its parameter:
template< template<class X, class Y> class Z > class A {};
I'd like to have a general version of A, for a general version of Z, but a specialisation of A for a specialisation of Z, e.g. where X is int but Y is still any type.
[URL]
#include <iostream>
#include <type_traits>
template<typename T, typename = void>
struct Test {
static int constexpr value = 1;
[Code] .....
Why does it output 1 instead of 2? How can I make it output 2 and still output 1 for e.g. Test<double>::value?
I want to write a template that combines two type of resources:
class someClasses {
typedef someType ElementType;
} template<class T1,class T2>
class combo {
...
}
And I want to specify my T1 and T2 has the same ElementType, how can I write my combo class to partial specialize the general case so the ElementType check is at compile time?
I want to specialize a particular function for Integer datatype inside a class template. My XX.h will be
namespace ZZ {
template <class T>
class XX {
void doSomething(T x);
};
}
provide me XX.cpp which has template specialization for the function doSomething on Integer datatype.
I tried the following in XX.cpp
#include "XX.h"
using namespace ZZ;
template <class T>
void XX<T>::doSomething(T x) {
[Code] ...
But this code is not working.
Can you take a look why I am getting compile error.
Code:
// clang++ main.cpp -g -std=c++11 -o main
#include <iostream>
class QuoteClass {
public:
QuoteClass() = default;
QuoteClass(std::string param) {symbol = param;}
std::string get_symbol() {return symbol;}
[Code] ....
This code snippet just won't compile in a conforming compiler:
Code:
template<> struct series<0.0, 0, 0>
Because of the floating point template parameter.... If this "specialization" is useful, how come MS would have discarded it?
I am trying to concatenate two words from a file together. ex: "joe" "bob" into "joe bob". I have provided my function(s) below. I am somehow obtaining the terminal readout below. I have initialized my memory (I have to use dynamic, dont suggest fixing that). I have set up my char arrays (I HAVE TO USE CHAR ARRAYS (c-style string) DONT SUGGEST STRINGS) I know this is a weird way to do this, but it is academic. I am currently stuck. My file will read in to my tempfName and templName and will concatenate correctly into my tempName, but I am unable to correctly get into my (*playerPtr).name.
/* this is my terminal readout
joe bob
<- nothing is put into (*playerPtr).name, why not?
joe bob joe bob
seg fault*/
/****************************************************************/
//This is here to show my struct/playerInit
[Code]....
For the past couple of weeks I have been working on a template to hold two-dimensional arrays. Right now I am puzzling over an indexing question.
There are many places in the template where I would like to use initializer_lists to refer to user-specified row and column ranges, particularly in member function arguments. A typical example would be a member function whose declaration would be along the lines of:
Code:
Array<Type>::some_function(std::initializer_list<int> columns, std::initializer_list<int> rows); which could get called via
Code:
arrayInstance.some_function({3:4}, {5:8});
It would be really nice to be able to use Matlab-style indexing to specify the last column, or the last row, in the Array object -- along the lines of
Code:
arrayInstance.some_function({3:4}, {5:END}); where END takes the value -1, and can be defined in Array, or somewhere else.
The way I have tackled this so far was to write myself an Indices PODS class with two elements to hold start and finish values, and a constructor-from-initializer_list that looks something like this:
Code:
Indices::Indices(std::initializer_list<int> range, int replace_value) {
int const *it = range.begin();
start = (*it == END) ? replace_value : *it ; ++it;
finish = (*it == END) ? replace_value : *it ;
...
}
So the elements of "range" give the values of Indices::start and Indices::finish -- but if either of them are entered as END by the user, they will be replaced by replace_value. (The default value of replace_value is END, so Indices::start and Indices::finish will never change if it is omitted.)
I also defined an Indices::endset(int) function to do the same thing for existing Indices objects:
Code:
Indices::endset(int replace_value) {
if (start == END) start = replace_value;
if (finish == END) finish = replace_value;
} Using Indices::endset, you can code up Array::some_function by modifying the above signature to something like
Code:
Array<Type>::some_function(Indices columns, Indices rows) {
columns.endset(this->M);
rows.endset(this->N);
...
}
This does work, and I've been able to use it in practice. However, it is klutzy. What I would really like to be able to do is have the Indices constructor handle value-replacements in "columns" and "rows", instead of needing to put calls to Indices::endset in every single Array<Type> member function that uses this approach.
The basic problem is that, when Array<Type>::some_function is called, there is no easy way of inserting Array<Type>::M and Array<Type>::N into the optional argument of the Indices constructor when "columns" and "rows" are being built.
The Indices class needs somehow to get access to these, and know which one is being used, M or N. So it needs to have some sort of deeper connection to Array<Type>, but I don't know what that connection should be.
lets say I have a char array with four elements but only one char is used, does it write four elements or just one?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI want to compare alphabetically two arrays. I try this:
char a[10] = "AABC";
char b[10] = "ZABC";
if(a > b) cout << a;
else cout << b;
But it always outputs a. How can I compare char arrays?
how to correctly use realloc on an array of char arrays? Say I want to store strings in arrays (=array of char arrays) and double the size of max. strings (y value):
Code:
int x=200;
int y=10;
char *carray[y];
for (int j = 0; j < y; ++j)
carray [j] = malloc (sizeof(char)*x);}
}
[code]...
fix the realloc part of my code?
I have most of the code working properly, but I'm having trouble with a certain area. Currently I have multiple 2D arrays. One is a char array and the other is an int array. In the int array I have to find the max number in each column, which I've done. The problem is, I need to print the max number's row in relation to the char array's row.
For example,
Code: int array[2][3] = {60 50 30 0 100 1}
The max numbers are 60, 100, 30.
char array[2][length+1] = {nameOne nameTwo}
How it needs to print:
nameOne has max score of 60.
nameTwo has max score of 100.
nameOne has max score of 30.
I just can't understand how to compare the two arrays in the right way, so it'll know that nameOne is associated with the numbers in row 0 and nameTwo in row 1, etc.
I've been experimenting with char arrays and getting user input through different methods.
int main() {
char userInput[21];
/*I understand that over here, a maximum of 20 letters can be input, and only letters before a space will be stored in userInput*/
std::cin >> userInput;
std::cout << userInput << std::endl;
[Code] ....
As I was testing, whenever I would input a single word for userInput (for example "hi"), the program would work as expected: it would output "hi" and I'd be able to input a sentence of sorts for userInput2 (for example "hello world") and have it outputted.
But if I were to input more than one word for user Input (for example "hi how are you"), the program would output "hi" as expected, but it wouldn't let me input anything for userInput2 and would just output the rest of the first input; in this case, "how are you" would be outputted and the program would end. I am not aware of the logic error at play.
send(sConnect, (userinput, key), 256, 0);
sConnect is already predefined as a socket
Key is a character array of [32]
Userinput is a character array of [256]
How can you send both of them at the same time using the send function without having to create a separate connection?
I'm having trouble with passing a character array between functions of the same class. I have a function, buildGraph, that calls function getNextLine. The getNextLine essentially just retrieves the next line of an input file and stores it into a "char line[80]". However when I try to use "line" in my buildGraph function, it has nothing in it.
Here's my code:
Class
#define NUMNODES 10
using namespace std;
#pragma once
class Prog3Graph
[Code] ....
This program works as expected:
Code:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
typedef struct {
unsigned long long int address;
float current;
unsigned char pressure_units;
}
[code]....
But I don't like how I had to use malloc and free. Is there a different way to accomplish copying the string into a char pointer without resorting to dynamic memory allocation?
I am porting code from windows using visual studio to mac with xcode.
Quite a lot of issue have a appeared, which is no surprise, one warning that keeps on appearing is Explicit Specialiszation cannot have a storage class:
enum SortReturnCodeEnum {LOWEST=1, HIGHEST=2, HIGHLOW = 3, IDENTICAL=4};
template<typename tKey>
static SortReturnCodeEnum DefaultCompare(typename ArgType<tKey>::ARGT Value1, typename ArgType<tKey>::ARGT Value2)
{
[Code]....
I could do a #define __GNUC__ but i was checking
I'm trying to implement a simple template array class, but when i came into the operator< i actually have to use a template :
my code is something like :
template<typename _Type, std::size_t _Size>
class array {
public :
[Code] ......
but i am having an error of shadows template param 'class _Type' is it w/ the name conflict between the array template parameter and the function template parameter ?
Error1error C2955: 'DoubleLinkedListInterface' : use of class template requires template argument listdoublelinkedlist.h10
Error2error C2244: 'DoubleLinkedList<T>::DoubleLinkedList' : unable to match function definition to an existing declaration doublelinkedlist.cpp7
Error3 .cpperror C2244: 'DoubleLinkedList<T>::~DoubleLinkedList' : unable to match function definition to an existing declaration 12
.h
#pragma once
#include "DoubleLinkedListInterface.h"
#include "Node.h"
#include <iostream>
[Code]....
how I want the code to look. Only problem is it doesn't work (Line 11). I have some experience with templates but I'm not a pro.
Basically I want the "Channels<3>" to be a type that I can use to specify a Cable with similar to vector<float/int> it would be Cable<Channels<2 or 3>>.
What have I messed up with the syntax?
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
using namespace std;
[Code].....
I have a function:
template<class Iterator, class T>
void a(Iterator, Iterator, const T&);
and I want to be able to simplify calls to 'a' with calls like
a(someIteratableContainer);
instead of having to call:
a(someIteratableContainer.begin(), someIteratableContainer.end(), valueOfTheContainersElementType);
I also want to be able to generalize the function to handle any of the standard iteratable contains: array, vector, deque, whatever.
I was under the impression I could write:
template<template<class T> class U> a(U<T>& container) {
a(container.begin(), container.end(), g(T()));
}
where 'g()' returns an object of the element type. However, the compiler is claiming, no matter how I write a call to the overload, the original template is selected and/or the overload is invalid, depending on the various ways I attempt to write said overload.
I have been trying to get a hang on templates. I have the two following functions that that could be consolidated in a single template function:
void Attractor::updateFamilies(FamiliesController *_tmp, int _counter){
center.x = ofGetWidth()/2;
center.y = ofGetHeight()/3;
attractorCounter = _counter;
if(attractorCounter == 1){
[Code] .....
NotesController and FamiliesController have the same parent. The thing that I'm trying to grasp with templates is that is could something like:
template<class TYPE>
void Attractor::updateData(TYPE* *_tmp, int _counter){
center.x = ofGetWidth()/2;
center.y = ofGetHeight()/3;
attractorCounter = _counter;
[Code] ....
And then have another template function declaration for all the attractor functions where I pass the same template value as in the first one.
As you can see, I'm calling another functions inside called attractors(_tmp). I know that one way around it could be to get rid of that function and just do all the logic inside of each if statement. Is there any way to pass the same template function parameter within a template function parameter?