I am looking a good design pattern that takes a combination of a Observer Design Pattern and Command Design Pattern.
Observer Design Pattern:
Subject - ISystem
ConcreteSubject - "Different Types of Systems"
Observer - INotifier
ConcreteObserver - "Different Types of Notifier's"
Command Design Pattern: Used to create a task. "Different Types of Task" ....
I am looking into some design pattern which works for validation.
I thought about using strategy but not sure whether its correct or not
Any design pattern allows to describe operation like the following.
MyFunctionObject f;
//Init f...
MyFunctionObject g;
//Init g...
MyFunctionObject h = f(g) + g;
[Code] .....
I'm interested in design pattern which permits to model this kind of structure, if there's of course...
I need to design an interface(a function prototype) that takes an argument which is used to pass information.
The information can be passed by independent modules and third party softwares and hence can vary today and in future.
Basically, the function interface(arg1, info)caters a niche service to many independent applications and needs to process based on requirements passed by applications in the argument(info, in example).
I am looking for a design pattern for the function parameter - info.
Should I use a void pointer that can be casted to respective application specific class in the function ? will this be a good C++ design ?
or should I take this parameter to be a pointer to a generic abstract class that points to the respective application specific specialization ?
Do we have some design pattern to address this so as to handle other unforeseen challenges ?
I need to design an interface(a function prototype) that takes an argument which is used to pass information.
The information can be passed by independent modules and third party softwares and hence can vary today and in future.
Basically, the function interface(arg1, info) caters a niche service to many independent applications and needs to process based on requirements passed by applications in the argument(info, in example).
I am looking for a design pattern for the function parameter - info.
Should I use a void pointer that can be casted to respective application specific class in the function ? will this be a good C++ design ?
or should I take this parameter to be a pointer to a generic abstract class that points to the respective application specific specialization ?
Do we have some design pattern to address this so as to handle other unforeseen challenges ?
In the following code example of the State Design Pattern, in the main code at the bottom it defines an instance of class Machine, and then calls Machine::off;. Why doesn't it instead call fsm.off;?
Machine fsm;
Machine::off;
Then I tried imitating that by adding a class Abba, and then doing:
Abba a;
Abba::DoStuff();
but that didn't work. Why?
Full code example:
// StatePattern.cpp : Defines the entry point for the console application.
//
#include "stdafx.h"
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
class Machine {
class State *current;
[Code] ....
I'm building a Windows Form Application using MVP Design Pattern; the application is quite simple, it just calculates the sum of two number; So I have a form in which are located tree textbox: number1 number2 and result, plus a button to perform the action.
interface ICalcView {
string firstN { get; set; }
string firstN {get; set;}
string result { get; set; }
[Code] ....
Do you think that is a good base to start? Any code example to understand the execution flow and how to handle events?
I have the following code where I use the singleton design pattern, but I get the warning:
warning C4715: 'CM::Instance' : not all control paths return a value
Code:
CM& CM::Instance() {
DWORD dwWaitResult = WaitForSingleObject(mutex, INFINITE);
switch(dwWaitResult) {
case WAIT_OBJECT_0:
[Code] ....
How can I fix this warning?
I was going through Singleton design pattern and get to know that objects can be created only by static function of that class and constructors are make private.
My question is, why assignment operators are not made private through which we can create a copy of already existing object.
I tried below code and assignment works, so I have new object sc3. I know that its referring to memory of sc1 but finally I was able to create object without using static function.
Also, why copy constructor not made as private.
Below is code:
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
class Singleton {
private:
static bool instanceFlag;
[Code] .....
I understand including the comctrl32 lib and header. I know to init common controls. I can create a tab window and add tabs to it.
I just can't seem to grasp of how to tell when a specific tab has been selected. I just need to know what to look for with winproc.
I've almost finished a Terminal/Command Prompt Program that can do most of the things a Microsoft or Linux Terminal can do - but I have a problem. I've got it to open programs fine, and I can also open their browser to the download page if they don't have it, but I need my program to know if there isn't the software so a bit like command prompt where it says 'The system cannot find the file test.txt.' and then it'll take them to the website if they like.
View 2 Replies View RelatedIs there a way an ASPX page can send a notification message to my IE Plugin which is developed in VC++?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI run the following API to put Windows XP SP3 into sleep (or standby mode) from a worker thread:
Code:
BOOL bForced = TRUE;
SetSuspendState(FALSE, bForced, FALSE);
Then in the main thread, while processing window messages:
Code:
LRESULT WindowProc(UINT message, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam) {
if(message == WM_POWERBROADCAST) {
if(wParam == PBT_APMSUSPEND) {
AddLogMsg(_T("SUSPEND event received"));
[Code] ....
So when SetSuspendState is called with request for a 'forced' sleep mode, the PBT_APMSUSPEND notification is never broadcast. Only if I set forced parameter to FALSE I receive it.
PBT_APMRESUMEAUTOMATIC is received in either case.
PBT_APMSUSPEND is always received when run on Windows Vista/7.
I have multiple bitmap buttons of non-square shape. Because of their odd shape I can overlap them and they will still look good on screen, which is what I want - that certain layout.
The problem is that because underlying button in reality is square (which I am subclassing), the bitmap of one button may overlay with the non-bitmap area of the other button (in the underlying square). This means that 2nd bitmap button will not receive notification because the press is registered with top level window only.
Is there a way that both windows can receive the notification and check if they are in the hot spot, they will respond? I know this is against windows design.
Here is what I am trying to do. I am reading from a socket. On receipt of specific data from the socket I have to start some computation (takes more than 5s). But if there is another input from the socket when the computation is in progress I need to disregard the ongoing computation and start all afresh. I have not come across any method which could suspend the ongoing task in the same context. I have thought of running computation in a separate thread. But I feel there must be some other methods doing it in the same context which I am unaware of. And, is my understanding correct that process would take up the new task only after completing the previous computation (which I do not want).
View 6 Replies View Relatedhow i am using wxDev-c++ and i need to make.Tasks would include: use a class or struct variable, and create a program that can perform the following actions:
1. The data provided by the user to enter the keyboard.
2. The display of the stored data.
3. edit the data.
Example of data: name surname age.
I Try like it,its let me input and save it but how to edit it or i am doing it bad?
#include<iostream>
#include<fstream>
using namespace std;
int main()
[code]....
Given N tasks (numbered 1-N) and a series of task restrictions (do task 3 before task 2) print out all possible task orderings.
Example input:
3
3 2
Explanation: there are 3 tasks and task 3 must be done before task 2 (each restriction will have its own line)
Example output:
1 3 2
3 1 2
3 2 1
I have been asked to create a program to overload a function which should accept and print first one integer and then two integers. Here is the code i have produced so far: [URL] ....
Code:
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
//Overloading f1 three ways
int f1(int a);
double f1(double a);
long f1(long a);
[Code] .....
I am aware the code should work. my only concern is the error i receive on line 12. I am certain there should be a value in the bracket but i dont know what.
I am searching for a way/api through which i can get list of Applications as showing by task manager inside Applications tab. Is there any way?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI want to show all running processes of windows.
my motive is whenever any running process closes/quits whether it be console or window based on windows it notify(s) me or user that some .exe has been closed.
I am checking out this simple piece of code:
private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) {
Stopwatch sw = Stopwatch.StartNew();
Task Task1 = Task.Factory.StartNew(() => {
Console.WriteLine("Task1 started in : "+ " "+sw.ElapsedMilliseconds);
Thread.Sleep(4000);
Console.WriteLine("Task1 finished in : " + " " + sw.ElapsedMilliseconds);
}
);
}
and the results are :
Task1 started in : 2 in milliseconds
Task1 finished in : 4015 in milliseconds.
The problem is, that if i count the time with an external device, just like the timer of my watch or my cellphone s,the total time is 4,8 or 4,9 seconds, which i wouldn t expect that to happen.
The first thing i ve thought, is that it takes the ThreadPool about 800msec or 1 sec to create the thread so as to execute this task, but even if it is so, shouldn t the stopwatch count the time precisely?So , why is there a deviation between an external timer and the stopwatch ?
The following code is an example of how task are created with micro cos III in c. I am trying to figure how to create similliar code in C++. My problem is how do I instantiate objects and how to use member functions to represent task. Within the create task routine the address of function is passed as argument. How do I do this in C++? Will I need more than one class? New to embedded C++.
/*!
* @brief LED Flasher Task
*/
void
led5_task (void * p_arg)
{
OS_ERR err;
(void)p_arg; // NOTE: Silence compiler warning about unused param.
[Code]...
My use case is this: I have a C# Console application. I would like to run it via the Windows Task Scheduler, and would like it to attempt to run until it succeeds. My problem is that I can't achieve this. How does the Windows Task Scheduler recognize that a program has failed? I tried returning 1 or 32 instead of 0 but that didn't work. One possibility is to have the rerun logic in the C# console application but it feels like there must be a better way.
View 6 Replies View RelatedBasically the question is to develop an application that allows: Create an application which stores information about people, along with a task list.
The user should be able to Store people's information
Name,
Age,
Telephone number,
Address
-Retrieve information by entering name
- Remove a person's record by entering their name
-Return records for all people, sorted according to an information type other than age
-Enter a task which needs doing, a priority entered for its urgency
-View highest priority task on the list
-User should be able to remove highest priority item on the list
How to develop this application on a console command line interface style or any other style.
I've been working on this code that should be looking like
1 3 5 3 1
3 5 7 5 3
5 7 9 7 5
3 5 7 5 3
1 3 5 3 1
but mine appears like this
1 3 5 3 1
3 5 7 5 3
5 7 9 7 5
3 3 5 7 9
1 3 1 3 5
This is the code I've got for now, I just don't know which logic I need to fix
int main(){
int r;
cout << "Rows?" << endl;
cin >> r;
for (int i = 1; i <= r; i+=2){
for (int j = i; j <= r+i; j+=2){
cout << j<< " ";
} for (int k = i+2; k >= i-1; k-=2){
[code]....
My need is that i need to design a program for a machine. The machine takes "x"qty of load, refines 30% of it and sends back the 70% to the initial position. after how many times, does the qty of the load refined will be equal to the initial load and how many times does it need tot be refined?
View 1 Replies View Related