C++ :: Force Registry Error Accessing Protected Variable
Apr 3, 2013
I am working on a physics engine, following the cyclone physics engine source code but a I am having trouble with an error that is occurring in my overloaded operator== function. It is saying that the information is unaccessible.
I am modifying a set of static variables inside of the class's member function. The static variables are private. An example of what I'm doing is as below,
utilities.h ----------- class utilities { private: static int num_nodes;
public: void parse_details(char* );
[Code] ....
I get a compilation error in the function void utilities::parse_details(char* filename)
which says: undefined reference to `utilities::num_nodes'
I don't understand why my compiler gives me this error when I'm trying to run this code:
Code:
#include <iostream> #include <cmath> using namespace std; class Airplane { public: Airplane(); ~Airplane();
[Code]...
The variable is protected. Yeah, that's right. But shouldn't a derived class be able to reach it? Or is it only in a function that the derived class is able to reach protected variables and isn't able to reach protected variables in the constructor?
Here is the link for my program, I want to access the average value which is located in grade.c (calculate_grade) class through driver.c (main function) but I don't know how to make "average" visible
I am doing a checkers program in C and were not allowed to use standard C99. Things are going relatively well so far. I have 2d array that acts as a matrix for my board and have ways to check if a space is empty and if it is occupied by a specific players chip.
Right now I have a giant messy method that I will split up sooner or later but Im just trying to understand and build the logic. It looks like this:
Code: void isValidMove(int origin, int dest, int player) { int rowDiff = abs(origin%8 - dest%8); int possibleMoveLeftUp = origin - 9; int possibleMoveLeftDown = origin + 9; int possibleMoveRightUp = origin - 7;
[Code] ....
So although its not pretty i think the logic is sound. I can tell whether or not a player is attempting to make a move or a jump. I haven't implemented make_move() yet but thats no problems. My biggest deal is that I need to find a way to tell the user he has to jump if its available. I feel like this is a very difficult task for me to grasp and is more about algorithm logic and math then the C language which is what the course is for.
So, how I could loop through all of a specific players chips and see if that player has an available jump. Also if he does then the jump has to be taken and then checked again as if there is another legal jump then it needs to be taken as well until their are no jumps left. Of course there could be 2 routes available, but I think I could deal with that if I just could come up with a reasonable way of checking....
i have a page (which i did not create) which opens as a modeless box with a save button. The save works great in saving comments. However the client wants to have the comments update on the page where the link is for the editable modeless box. is there a way to post pack to the original page to force the page to refresh the information?
info:
All information is gathered on the page load event.
there is a section that shows all the comments for a certain item
a link to edit the comments that opens up a modeless box
save button in the modeless box
I have tried the
Page.ResolveUrl(
And response redirect but they give me errors of unknown url) i am guessing it has something to do with the dynamic data crap.
I want to declare a char* array, and then make any future variables declared to be stored in a specific location within the char* array. Is this even possible, and if it is how would I go about doing it. (I plan on storing any primitive data type in it (not classes or structs), and they may signed or unsigned).....
Is is possible to force derived classed to overload certain operators, like we do with pure virtual functions?
Is this possible to dynamically bind objects to their respective overloaded operators?
I am getting errors with undefined references to my base class vtable when I hackly try to overload: Code: operator+ I am not sure whether this is possible.
I want to declare a char* array, and then make any future variables declared to be stored in a specific location within the char* array. Is this even possible, and if it is how would I go about doing it (I plan on storing any primitive data type in it (no classes or structs), and they may signed or unsigned). I want to be able to use the variables like any other variable, I just want the variable's address to be within the char* array.
I am trying to make a program that is similar to a virtual machine and an emulator put together, and it can only run one os (which will be hard-coded into to the program). The reason I wanted to do this is because it would be the easiest way to make sure that all variables in memory are in one contiguous block, that way the part that manages memory wouldn't have to store the locations of each variable (which would have been necessary for the virtual memory manager).
An example of what I am wanting to do is
char* ram [256]; // Address 0x00 to 0xff
// Code to make sure that new variables' addresses are in ram[] if necessary
unsigned short a = 5; // Gets stored at address 0x00
unsigned int b = a; // Gets stored at address 0x00+sizeof(a)
I have a CMFCToolbar containing a CMFCComboBoxButton which needs to be updated via a view. The view correctly updates the selection of the ComboBoxButton however the edit window is not updated until the control receives the focus or the entire window is redrawn.
How can I force the redrawing of the control to show the updated selection via the view
I am doing C++ data structures exercises, and I am still learning some of the more basic concepts. I have a parent class:
template<class T> class linkedListType { public: protected: int count; nodeType<T> *first; nodeType<T> *last; private: };
Derived class:
#include "linkedListType.h" template<class T> class orderedLinkedList: public linkedListType<T> { public: void mergeList(orderedLinkedList<T> &list1, orderedLinkedList<t> &list2) { first = list1.first; ... } private: };
There is more code in my mergeList() function, but I included the line that is giving me problems. The error that my CodeBlocks compiler is giving me is that 'first' was not declared in this scope.
Strangely enough, if I change it to this->first, the error disappears.
1. Why does it not recognise 'first'? 2. Why would this->first work at all? Is the 'this' object a smart pointer?
I mainly code plugins for Cinema 4D .... I used to code in COFFEE (a javascript like language, only for Cinema 4D) and python. But, recently, I started coding in C++.
I start my development on a Mac, using Xcode. But then, to generate Windows versions of my plugins, I take my source code to Visual Studio, perform the necessary adjustments, and create Win32 and Win64 code.
Lately, I was trying to devise a scheme to protect my plugins from being pirated. Yes, I know it is virtually impossible, but if I could make it harder for hackers to crack my plugins, it would be fine. I made it work fine in python and in C++, but only in Xcode.
In Windows it is difficult. I only need to be able to access a username/password protected folder in my server and check if there is a file there. I don't even need to read the content of the file (but it would be nice to be able to do that too).
I started out using the cURL library but it is so complicated to make it work. I need 32 and 64 bit versions. Then I also have to include three .dll files in the folder of the application (that means that I would have to ask to the people who buy my plugins to copy three additional files to the main application folder... not a good thing )
So, any way to access a username/password protected folder on the net? (the username/password is generated in my code so, of course, I know what are the username/password to provide).
Also, I would need a way for the code to be completely self-contained, meaning that the users would not have to manually add any other files (libraries), besides the folder containing my plugin.
Is there a way to detect whether or not a template type has a protected destructor?
I see there is std::is_destructible in C++11, but I can't tell if this will return true or false for the protected case. Also, I'm interested in finding a solution for C++03 as well.
I have one problem with my code it's working until end of this program and program show this error: Run-Time check failure #2 - Stack around the variable 'Obsd" was corrupted.
here is a code, :
#include <iostream> #include <conio.h> using namespace std; struct SData { int SDSamples; float SDSampleCount;
#include <iostream> #include <string> struct WeatherStats { double total_rainfall; int high_temp; int low_temp; int avg_temp;
[Code] ....
When I run this program I am able to input data for the three months but after inputting everything I am prompted with a run time error that states: Run time check failure#3: The variable 'temp' is being used without being initialized. I've underlined the statement that the compiler says is causing this error, yet there is no variable 'temp' in that statement.
Computer are very specific right? So in the problem statement total_yearly_temp = total_yearly_temp + temp.avg_temp; there is a variable called total_yearly_temp and one called temp.avg_temp, but there are none called temp. It can't be complaining about the WeatherStats variable I defined in the first line of the function called temp because I did the exact same thing in the previous function and there are no errors concerning that.
I'm working through this neural network tutorial, unfortunately I get stuck trying to compile on line 28, saying "error: 'neuronNum' not declared in this scope." I seem to always get stuck on these kinds of errors, yet I don't understand because I though that the variable was declared and initialized within the for loop.
#include <iostream> #include <vector> using namespace std;
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; using System.Text; namespace Furniture { class Program { static void Main(string[] args)
[Code] ....
I tried changing the type of variable to char but i still get the same result. i also tried using a switch statement which was my first choice but i had the same issue.
I have `MainShop`(base class) then `SwordShop` and `BowShop`(derived classes) and another derived class called `Inventory`. I have a vector under protected in my base class, and when I access it from my derived classes it's okay, but each one has its own value. How can I set them all to have the same value?
//MainShop.h #pragma once class MainShop { private: //some variables protected: vector <string> WeaponInventory;
[code]......
Here every time I run it, it goes straight to the `else` and it displays that I do not have any items. I want to just have one vector for both my bow and Sword shops because vectors take up a lot of memory and my teacher said keep them to a minimum. So I just want one vector that takes in items from my bow class as well as my sword class, but for some reason it's acting as if I have multiple vectors, each with its own set of items.
I have two from in visual studio 2010 with C#. In form1 I have one combobox and one button .In form2 I have Reportviewer . When Button in form1 is clicked form2 is shown. Now my problem is when I click button to show form2 on the line Form2.Show(); this error appear : Attempted to read or write protected memory. This is often an indication that other memory is corrupt. What can i do? In form1 I have one combobox that combo fill with Database with this code in the Form Load:
I am developing an application which monitors file changes and also registry key changes during a driver installation. I have used this code from internet, but doesn't works.
public void WmiChangeEventTester() { try { WqlEventQuery query = new WqlEventQuery( "SELECT * FROM RegistryValueChangeEvent WHERE " + "Hive = 'HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE'" + @"AND KeyPath = 'SOFTWARESchneider ElectricDMODBUS' AND ValueName='CurrentVersion'");
My program works before i declare a new variable in class. Right after i declared a new int variable called prevans in my guess class, my program crashes when it runs.
If I DEFINE a global variable in two source files which belong to the same project, then there is a linker error "multiply defined symbols". But if I DEFINE a global variable in two source files which belong to the different projects, then it compiles fine. Why?