write a program as described below: program that reads in two integers (age, social security number). You should write functions that throw an out-of-range exception forage (no negative numbers)SSN (must be a 9-digit integer) My code is written below:
#include "std_lib_facilities_4.h"
int main(){
int age = 0;
int ssn = 0;
[Code].....
writing a program that requires exception handling. if an error occurs, i what the program to go back to the begging of the loop. i tried using break but that just makes the program crash when it receives a bad input. how do i do this? this is what i have so far (this part of the program any ways)
while (! quit)
{
// Output phone book menu
cout << endl
[Code].....
How to incorporate exception handling code into my existing calcMortgage code. While I was researching exception handling, I thought "what would happen with my current code if someone input the principal with a comma in it?". Typically people write two hundred thousand like so.... 200,000. While experimenting with my original code, I remembered reading in my research that someone had done their calcMortgage with the output prompt "DO NOT USE COMMAS". So, when checking to see if my code would run, I did not use commas.
Well, guess what...using a comma in the principal causes an error with a negative numerical output. lol PERFECT!!!! Obviously, the easy thing to do would be to put output instructions in the code telling the user NOT to use commas, but the assignment requires me to use exception handling. The code itself works, but the calculation produces a negative monthly payment.
How would I insert exception handling code into my current code to correct this problem??
#include <iostream>
#include <cstdlib>
#include <cmath>
using namespace std;
struct calcMortgage {
double Principal, numYears, IntRate, monthlyPayments;};
int main(){
[Code]...
would I use a try or a throw??
I know how exception handling works, but how should I actually use it in action? Let's say I have something like this:
Class X
{
public:
X();
//Pre-condition: example can't be 3.
void number(int example);
[code]......
If I know that the exception can only happen at the beginning of the function, is it okay to catch it right away?
It is advisable not to throw the exception from destructor. Because if exception happens stack unwinding happens. suppose the destructor again throws the exception then on part of first exception again one exception is thrown and exceptions can not be handled at same time. This is what i read from stack over flow.
View 10 Replies View RelatedI'm out of track how to realize one point in exercise condition wording :
Give the OutOfBoundsException class a constructor with an int as argument that indicates the erroneous array index and store it in a data member.
How should I change the code below .
Code:
//array.h
#ifndef Array_H
#define Array_H
#include "point.h"
#include <string>
using namespace std;
class Array {
private:
Point* m_data; // Dynamic Array of Point pointers
[code]....
I have a date class and i overloaded operator >> to accept input in dd/mm/yyyy format. if i enter the wrong date format my program will crash. How do i do exception handling for this? How should i do the try part? and for catch, I'll just catch a date class variable?
Code:
void operator >> (istream &is, clsDate &date) {
string inputDate;
is >> inputDate;
int mm = stringToNumber(inputDate.substr(3,2)); // read 2 characters from character number 3 start
int dd = stringToNumber(inputDate.substr(0,2)); // read 2 characters from character number 0 start
int yy = stringToNumber(inputDate.substr(6,4)); // read 4 characters from character number 6 start
[Code] .....
I'm having some significant trouble with an assignment to create a postfix calculator that simulates the dc calculator function in linux. I have attached the handout with project instructions, but my main problem at the moment lies with parsing through the string input and adding the numbers into a stack of ints.
Project #2.pdf (47.78K)
Here's a brief summary of the methods used in the switch statement:
OPERATORS AND COMMMAND INPUTS
+ : Pops two values off the stack, adds them, and pushes the result.
- : Pops two values, subtracts the first one popped from the second one popped, and pushes the result.
* : Pops two values, multiplies them, and pushes the result.
/ : Pops two values, divides the second one popped from the first one popped, and pushes the result.
% : Pops two values, computes the remainder of the division that the / command would do, and pushes that.
Commands
p - Prints the value on the top of the stack, without altering the stack. A newline is printed after the value.
f - Prints the entire contents of the stack without altering anything. A newline is printed after each value
n - Prints the value on the top of the stack, pops it off, and does not print a newline after.
c - Clears the stack, rendering it empty.
d - Duplicates the value on the top of the stack, pushing another copy of it. Thus "4d*p" computes 4 squared and prints it.
r - Reverses the order of (swaps) the top two values on the stack.
Exception handling also needs to be added to account for division by zero and and invalid operator.
Right now my biggest problem is that I keep getting the following strange output where a 0 is automatically added to the stack when I call a function or operator. I realize this is probably because of the lines I have placed outside of the for loop that read
//END FOR LOOP
int num = atoi(operands.c_str());
myStack.push(num);
operands = "";
cout << num << " added." << endl;
But when I tried putting these statements INSIDE the for loop, I just get more errors. I've been working on this for a number of hours but I can't figure out my issue. I've also attached an image of my current output.
#include <iostream>
#include <cctype>
#include <string>
#include <cstdlib>
using namespace std;
#include "stack.h"
bool isOperator(const char& input );
[code]....
My MDI Project(VC++2010 Professional) is unable to catch errors ,though I return ,try catch block. So I developed simple dialog based application .Placed one button on Dialog and on its click written following code
Collapse | Copy Code
void CMFCExecDlg::OnBnClickedButton1() {
try {
int j = 0;
int i = 10/j;
}
catch(CException * e) {
MessageBox(_T("Hello"),_T(""),MB_OK);
}
}
But still program control does not come in catch block it simply gives error. I tried all child classes of CException but no use.I think there will be some setting in Visual Studio. How to handle exceptions
The code is compiled.
If I do loops for push and pop fucntions in main.cpp the same size as Stoke everything is working properly
If loops are larger than the Stack size that goes here is a picture in the console (see screen print)
Code:
//
//(---.Array_hpp---)
//
#ifndef Array_HPP// Preprocessor gates
#define Array_HPP
#include <sstream>
#include <iostream>
#include <exception>
template <class Type>//Remove the "=double" default parameter.
[code]....
My code in c++ is
#include<iostream.h>
main()
{int a[10],x[5];
a[-7]=15;
x[5]=20;
cout<<x[-5];
}
I am trying to create a program that would execute a foreground process. I have this code for the foreground process
Code:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <signal.h>
int main() {
int temp;
printf("We are in the current program
[Code] ....
And this is my main program
Code:
#include <unistd.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <stdio.h>
int main() {
signal(SIGINT, SIG_IGN);
[Code] ....
My main program stops executing after the process "./scanf" executes and there fore does not print the line "How are You"...
I want to main program to continue executing after "./scanf" finishes. How to achieve that?
I'm trying to make a Quiz program based on C++'s Data File Handling capablities. I've attached the code in .txt file and I wonder why I'm getting the error identifier bScience cannot have a type qualifier?
Attached Files QuizPro.txt (9.6 KB)
I've written a program to read inputs in a text file. The file named Input.txt contain integers 2 3 and 4. My program is as follows:
#include<iostream>
#include<cstdlib>
#include<fstream>
using namespace std;
int main (){
int x,y,z;
[Code] ....
the program is outputing x=2293616 , y=0 and z=0 instead of x=2, y=3 and z=4.
My perceptron's train function seems to materialize my BadInput exception object out of nowhere. Yet, everything works fine.
And when I put an forever loop in main to validate the output with many different inputs, I get a bad_alloc exception and a call to terminate().
BadInput.hpp
Code:
#ifndef BADINPUT_HPP
#define BADINPUT_HPP
class BadInput {
public:
BadInput(int val):difference(val) {
[Code] ....
I cannot figure out why train() is throwing an exception...feedforward didn't, as it's error message never printed.
I catch an exception and want to log it on the console. This works as exepcted, but Valgrind shows me a set of invalid reads.
Here the code of the catch-block:
} catch(HGL::IOException &e) {
logError(e);
}
The signature of the logDebug is: BasicLogger &operator<<(const std::exception &e);
Now valgrind shows me 4 errors like that:
==20943== Invalid read of size 1
==20943== at 0x402C658: strlen (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-x86-linux.so)
==20943== by 0x41554DD: std::basic_ostream<wchar_t, std::char_traits<wchar_t> >& std::operator<< <wchar_t, std::char_traits<wchar_t> >(std::basic_ostream<wchar_t, std::char_traits<wchar_t> >&, char const*) (in /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.16)
[Code] .....
Generally I dislike invalid read in my code, even if they are harmless like in that case.
If I don't pass a reference, but a copy of the exception, I don't get this invalid reads, but also loose all information, because of the implicit upcasting.
Why I get the illegal read, resp. why std::wstring is deleting it on the way to the <<-operator?
I'm trying to do some operator overloading, the function is supposed to add the values at index [i] of two vectors and place the result in the returning vector. The problem is I keep getting a vector out of range. This is the overloaded operator I'm working with (relatively new to these):
vector<float> operator+(const vector<float>& a, const vector<float>& b){
unsigned long size;
vector<float> temp;
if(a.size() >= b.size())
size = a.size();
[Code] .....
and then I would do something like this in the main:
vector<float> v, v1, v2;
v1.push_back(9.1);
...
v2.push_back(8);
...
v = v1 + v2;
but when I try to output the vector v I just get a vector out of range exception.
I'm making an "improved" array for my programing class. It's currently unfinished, so you might see some commented out code. I'm trying to debug what I have.
I keep getting these errors when I try to complile my main.cpp:
In file included from main.cpp:3:0:
array.h:107:43: error: expected type-specifier before ‘out_of_range’
array.h:107:43: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘out_of_range’
array.h:107:43: error: expected initializer before ‘out_of_range’
array.h:121:55: error: expected type-specifier before ‘out_of_range’
array.h:121:55: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘out_of_range’
array.h:121:55: error: expected initializer before ‘out_of_range’
My main file:
#include <iostream>
#include <stdexcept>
#include "array.h"
using namespace std;
using namespace ArrayNameSpace;
int main()
{
Array<int> testSubject(5);
return 0;
}//End main
aannnd my Array.h file:
//ADD CONSTS TO METHODS
//CURRENTLY WORKING ON EXCEPTIONS AND BRACKET[] OVERLOADS. I HAVE TO FIGURE OUT SOLUTIONS FOR REACHING
//INDEXES FOR CHARS AND ENUMS
#ifndef __array_H__
#define __array_H__
#include <stdexcept>
namespace ArrayNameSpace
{
[code]....
I have been assigned to create a search function in text file, but I received this error when I run the program and try to search: Error message: Unhandled exception at 0x0f85d442 (msvcr100d.dll) in Ticket.exe: 0xC0000005: Access violation reading location 0xcccccd08.
I don't know what is the exactly problem. So I just copy everything and paste here. Please don't fear of these codes, I have 2 files only, but I will paste 3 files here, the one is prototypes.h, then the main.cpp, the last one is part of my function that can working well alone, but when I put them into main.cpp I will get the error message like I mentioned before.
If a class A contains an array of objects of another class B.. And in the constructor of A, while constructing objects of B, any one object throws an exception, then how can we guarantee to release all the memory acquired.. so that there is no memory leak..
class B{};
class A{
public:
B Array[100];
...
};
In the above code, if in constructor of A, suppose 99 objects of B are constructed successfully, but 100th object throws exception, then how can we guarantee to release all the memory acquired by the other 99 objects?
I have one problem deleting a file with boost. The file is opened in another application and cannot be deleted. I am supposed to received an exception error but I don't get it.
Here is my piece of code, very simple:
bool delete_file(const string &path) {
boost::filesystem::path bpath(path);
try {
if (boost::filesystem::remove(bath)) return true;
[Code] ....
I have put a breakpoint inside the catch part but it does not come to this point. Instead, the the output window of visual studio, I got these lines:
First-chance exception at 0x00007FFD2E575A88 in site_server.exe: Microsoft C++ exception: boost::filesystem::filesystem_error at memory location 0x00000070F8E3E920.
Unhandled exception at at 0x00007FFD2E575A88 in site_server.exe: Microsoft C++ exception: boost::filesystem::filesystem_error at memory location 0x00000070F8E3E920.
How to manage this situation?
I'm getting Unhandled exception when try to run option 3.
This my code below.
Code:
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
using namespace std;
struct Vet {
string name;
int numOfAnimals;
string phoneNum;
[code]....
When creating an exception mask for a file, should an exception throw during a file operation, I can reset the state bits of the actual file using ios::clear().
Though after doing so, will the exception mask still throw an exception, thinking that the specified error state flags are still set to true? If so, how can I reset the exception mask so that it is ready to throw more exceptions should the appropriate situations arise in the future?
I tried to write a little bit of code to set all bits within a signed int with exception to the MSB, yielding the greatest max positive value. The odd part is that it works for shorts ints, and longs, which are 2, 4 and 4 bytes respectively, however long longs, with a size of 8 bytes, simply yields -1, which would indicate that it failed to clear the MSB. Heres the little segment in question:
template<typename T>
T getMax() {
return my::numerics<T>::is_signed ?
~0 ^ (1 << ((sizeof(T)*8)-1) ):
~0;
}
my::numerics is just an exercise- its thoroughly tested and I'm certain thats not the issue.
For shorts, ints, longs, this yields the maximum value. However, when I use it on long longs, the output is 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF, i.e. ~0. Obviously this means the maximum value for unsigned long longs, but -1 for signed long longs.
Below is exception proof approach of assignment operator shared by scott meyer. Is it safe to delete the raw pointer.
int *orig =m_p;
m_p=new int (*obj.m_p);
delete orig;
#include <iostream>
#include <fstream>
#include <string>
#include <locale>
#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>
#include <set>
using namespace std;
//*******************************************************************
bool char_compare(const char& d1, const char& d2)
[code]....