I wrote this program using an online compiler i am getting a lot of errors.
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <sstream>
using namespace std;
int main() {
string birthmonth;
string birthday;
[Code] ....
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
int main(){
int polje[8][8];{
for(int i=0;i<8;i++)
for(int j=0;j<8;j++) {
[Code] .....
I don't get any errors,the program works. The problem is that it doesnt work how it should. This is a simple program that multiplies 2 variables(i and j)that go from 0 to 7. The problem I have is with the logical operators,i want the program to skip multiplication with 0 and when the 2 variables are the same value. When i try using only 1 logical operator it work.
I've received a segmentation fault in this part of code:
Code:
for (; str[i] != ' ' || str[i] != ' '; i++) {
result[result_pos] = str[i];
result_pos++;
}
which, should mean:
Code: If str[i] is not equal to NULL character nor ' '; then, keep printing the chars within the word to variable result.
To understand what the function does, here's the whole code:
static char result[999];
/* char *split_word(const char *str, long n);
* Splits a string word-by-word. Where N is the word number. */
char *split_word(const char *str, long n) {
[Code]....
I'm trying to accomplish an easier way round to split string by word than using "strtok_r()". It might sound like "re-inventing the wheel", but... i will try to make it neat later.
The code looks okay, why would it segfault?
Let's say I have a product that needs service after 500 hours at 100 RPM. I can dsiplay the remaining hours only as an integer and we only have integer math. Management wants it to display 500 for the first hour, not 499 after the first minute is ticked off. But after a few minutes fullHours will be 499 and partialHours will have some value. I have 3 ways to determine displayHours to suit management and I want to know if the first is ligit.
short fullHours = 500;
short partialHours = 0;
short displayedHours = 0;
// Method 1 - Is is Kosher to cast a boolean as an int? Is TRUE always a 1 or is that a bad assumption?
displayedHours = fullHours + (short) (partialHours != 0);
//Method 2 - Works but some have disdain for the ternary conditional
displayHours = fullHours + (partialHours ? 1 : 0);
//Method 3 - seems a bit pedantic
displayHours = fullHours;
if (partialHours != 0) {
displayHours++;
}
I wrote this code to solve a problem in which the user inputs a permutation of size 'N' and the next permutation of the same elements has to be generated.
I went about this in this way: given 3 2 5 4 1, starting from the right, the first no. has to be searched which has a no. greater to it on its right. Here it is 2. Now an array is generated containing all no.s on its right and greater than it. For 2, it is: 5,4. Out of these the smallest member is searched for and switched with 2. So, 4 is switched with 2 to get the Next Permutation: 3 4 5 2 1.
The code I wrote does not show any error but does not return the correct value when run and gives the same value instead. If I enter '3 2 5 4 1' it returns the same value as the answer.
#include<iostream.h>
#include<conio.h>
void main() {
clrscr();
int N,M,i,n,c,swap,flag,count,small,m;
int Array[100],Key[100];
[Code] .....
int main()
{
char rORc, choice;
int sizerc;
[Code]....
when I input the character which is the underscore, and the row # it should display the table and sort that specific row. Why is the if statement skipped? This is not the complete program but has everything needed.
My project is on an online shop in which you can manage a shop(adding ,deleting ,clearing and modifying items) also you can switch to different shops(all shops are same)
Code:
#include<iostream>
#include<fstream>
#include<conio.h>
#include<stdlib.h>
#include<string.h>
[Code] ....
The logical problem is serious because i am not able to find the error!!! There is some problem with display lines in void shop()-->if(mode=='s') and if(mode=='d'). I add only one item but in output screen i see two items(sometimes >2)
*note* to run the above display lines in the output screen....first register--->add atleast one item--->see your shop
I am looking for a library to aid me in evaluating Boolean expressions. For example, i have an expression like this:
(1*(5+3)+9*65/5-(354*4565*5643+98) >= 12345) && ( 654*987+123 || (2345 > 23423 && 1 != 2)))
(It can also be much longer!) and would like to evaluate them to a true/false boolean.
There are tons of libraries to calculate the (numerical) result of a mathematical expression, but this is not what i want to do.
I have to write a program that does the following: Monkey Business A local zoo wants to keep track of how many pounds of food each of its three monkeys eats each day during a typical week. Write a program that stores this information in a two-dimensional 3 - 7 array , where each row represents a different monkey and each column represents a different day of the week. The monkeys are represented by integers 1, 2, and 3; the weekdays are "Sunday", "Monday", "Tuesday", "Wednesday", "Thursday", "Friday", "Saturday". The program should first prompt the user to input the data for each monkey, starting with "Sunday" for monkey #1, then monkeys #2 and #3, followed by "Monday" for monkey #1, then monkeys #2 and #3 and so on, through "Saturday". The program then creates a report that includes the following information, each properly labeled (see below):
-Average amount of food eaten per day by the whole family of monkeys.
-The least amount of food eaten during the week by any one monkey.
-The greatest amount of food eaten during the week by any one monkey.
Input Validation: Do not accept negative numbers for pounds of food eaten. When a negative value is entered, the program outputs "invalid (negative) food quantity -- re-enter" and attempts to reread the value . Prompts And Output Labels: Decimal values should be displayed using default precision, i.e. do not specify precision. Each item read should be prompted for by a string of the form "Enter the food eaten by monkey #N on DAY:" when N is 1 or 2 or 3 and DAY is "Sunday" or "Monday" or ... or "Saturday".
The output should be of the form:
Average food consumed daily: 6.23
The least daily food consumed was by Monkey #0 on Friday
The most daily food consumed was by Monkey #2 on Sunday where the specific amount of food or specific monkeys or specific days identified depend on the actual input.
However after the process of resolving the errors unable to convert to standard string and unresolved externals I now have a logical error that causes the output of the DAYNAME variable to output as what appears to be hex in the following picture:
How I can fix this and why it's casting them as this in the output.
My full code is as follows because I don't know exactly, which line of code is causing this to happen:
Code:
//
#include <iostream>
#include <iomanip>
#include <string>
using namespace std;
// constants
const int MONKEYS = 3;
const int DAYS = 7;
[Code] .....
If input value was shifted to the right on bit level. How can I determine whether a logical or arithmetic shift is performed.
Code:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
void main ()
[Code]......
This is an example of how sub string and math can be used to make logical decisions without using if/elses or switches. It works because of this equation
(x + |x|)/x = 2 if x > 0 and = 2 if x < 0.
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <cmath>
using namespace std;
int main() {
//declaration of variables
[Code] ....
When things at work get overwhelming, it's not unusual for me to briefly "escape" by writing small programs simply for fun. A few days ago, I had an idea for a "binary game". I completed the first draft of it yesterday.
The idea is simple. The game uses 8-bit values. At the start of the game, a random "target" value is generated. The player is dealt a "hand" of seven values. The object is to use the values in your hand, along with some basic logical operations, to create the "target" value. While the idea is simple, the game itself can be quite difficult.
Here is an example of the output:
Code: --------------------
T: 1111 1100 (0xFC)
--------------------
0: 0000 0000 (0x00)
--------------------
1: 1100 1110 (0xCE)
2: 1010 0011 (0xA3)
3: 1100 0101 (0xC5)
4: 1011 1111 (0xBF)
5: 1010 1011 (0xAB)
6: 0001 1011 (0x1B)
7: 0001 1011 (0x1B)
--------------------
: Looking at the first column:
- 'T' is the "target" value
- '0' can be thought of as the "game board" - this is the value that needs to match the target value for a win
- '1' - '7' are the values in your "hand"
You can apply logic AND ('A'), OR ('O'), or XOR ('X') to a value in your hand with the value on the "game board". You are also allowed to apply logic to two values in your hand to create a new value for your hand. When a value from your hand is used, it is removed.
Some examples of the commands:
A30 --- apply logic AND to value #3 in your hand, and the "game board" value
O23 --- apply logic OR to value #2 in your hand and value #3 in your hand
X70 --- apply logic XOR to value #7 in your hand, and the "game board" value
You can also be dealt new values (as long as there's room in your hand) with the '+' command. 'H' or 'h' prints the help, and 'Q' or 'q' exits the game.
I haven't thoroughly tested it yet, since I just finished it a yesterday, but so far it looks good. The program itself uses only standard C.
I was dickering with the idea of supporting more logical operators (NOT, NAND, NOR, XNOR, shift), but I like the simplicity and resulting difficulty of the current implementation.
During initial testing, I realized it's possible to have doubles in your hand. Also, it's quite possible to be dealt the target value directly, which means that you could potentially win with one move, chance permitting. At first I thought about defending against these conditions, but came to the conclusion that it is fine as is - chances of an instant win are small, and if it does occur, would still be an enjoyable experience. Besides, if you're dealt the target value after the "game board" value has been modified.
Also, I did not allow a value of "zero" in the players hand. This was originally because I thought it would be of little use (though I've been reconsidering this). This also means that if two values in the hand are combined and result in zero, both values are removed and no new value is added. This was originally a bug, but I think I'll just reclassify it as a feature
So far, I found that the best strategy is to avoid modifying the "game board" value, and just play with the values in your hand. If you can get the target value in your hand, you just OR it with the "game board" and you're done.
I've encountered a slight logical error in my code
/*
Lab06_pensionplans.cpp
Purpose :
- Create a simple financial application to calculate retirement plans
*/
#include <iostream>
#include <cstdlib>
using namespace std;
void displayMenu() {
system("cls");
[Code] ....
Look at case 2, which the user supposed to key in a new input, the problem is the value will never got into main function, I don't know what should I modify with the function.
Figured out I need to change the
void changeData(int startingAge, int numOfYears,
double lumpSumAmount, double yearlyAmount, double interestRate )
into
void changeData(int &startingAge, int &numOfYears,
double &lumpSumAmount, double &yearlyAmount, double &interestRate )
The + operator has left to right associativity then for the program f1() + f2(), why f1() is not called first compared to f2()?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have a code that uses multi threads using OMP. However, Inside the code I allocate too many memory using "new".
I know that the memory allocation using new must be done in serial. Therefore I am not getting a good performance out of the multi-threaded program.
I thought about allocating a big memory only once, and then advance the pointer every time I need to allocate a small memory.
For example, if I need to allocate chunks of 7 doubles:
Code:
main_memory = new double [10000];
double* x1 = main_memory;
main_memory+= 7;
double* x2 = main_memory;
main_memory+= 7
However, I do not know how to handle the memory deallocation. Beside, this is not thread safe method because main_memory is shared by all threads.
May be there is a boost library that does this, which I am not aware of.
I have two class GameOfLife and Cell and i want to overload square braket for class GameOfLife."if g is a GameOfLife object, g[10][5] will return the Cell at row 10 and column 5. If there is no such Cells, then it will return a new Cell with position (-1000,- 1000)."
but if g[10][1000] and 1000>cols,then it returns different Cell exp (3,2) How i do control the col ( [row][col] )?
Code: vector<Cell> GameOfLife::operator [](const int row){
vector<Cell> rowCell;
for(int i=0; i<cols; ++i)
{
if( isLive(row,i) )
rowCell.push_back( Cell(row,i) );
else
rowCell.push_back( Cell(-1000,-1000) );
}
return rowCell;
}
Came across the foll code:
#include<stdio.h>
main() {
int i=4,j=7;
j=j||(printf("you can")&&(i=5));
printf("%d %d",i,j);
}
output: 4 1
Although I am specifying the braces for the && operator so that it gets executed first..Then also the value of i remains 4 only..Why does not it gets changed to 5??Also the printf does not execute??
Switch case statements are a substitute for long if statements that compare a variable to several "integral" values ("integral" values are simply values that can be expressed as an integer, such as the value of a char).
So does that mean switch statements can only test if variable == value and nothing more, like > < >= <= != etc... ? I tried to make a program to test this and it seems like switch statements are limited to == but I'm not sure, maybe I'm doing something wrong.
This is the program I tried to make to test this:
Code:
#include <stdio.h>
int main () {
int n;
[Code]....
So is it true that switch statements only work with the built in == operator? if that was the case then I would feel rather meh about switch statements.
I have a small piece of code that used the set::insert function on a set of myClass. For that, I need to overload the < and > operators, which I have, but I still get a huge error saying it can't compare.
set<MyClass> mySet;
MyClass myClass
All the class information gets filled in. Then, I try to insert...
mySet.insert(myClass);
bool operator<(MyClass &lhs, MyClass &rhs) {
return lhs.name < rhs.name; //name is a string
}
The error says
...stl_function.h:230:22: error: no match for 'operator<' in '__x < __y'
MyFile.h:80:6: note: candidate is bool operator<(MyClass&, MyClass&)
I'm experimenting with a custom memory-pool for my application, and I initially planned to override the global new and delete operators to allocate memory in this pool. But since I'm using QT, this will apply to all the QT-related stuff as well. Should I instead just override the new and delete operators per class?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have two files NumDays.h and ClientProgram.cpp
clientprogram.cpp basically has the main module below
int main(){
// Initialized UDT object Declarations
NumDays hoursWorked_John; // Instantiate with Default Constructor
NumDays hoursWorked_Sue(36.9); // Instantiate with Initializing Constructor
NumDays hoursUsed_Sue(4.5); // Instantiate with Initializing Constructor
[Code] .....
I can't figure out anything to put in for NumDays.cpp so it's not there.
In the following program.
void main() {
int a=1;
cout<<a++<<" "<<++a<<" "<<a++<<endl;
}
If I execute the above program i should get 1 3 3. But I'm getting different values when I executed this program. The values that I get after execution are 3 3 1.
I made a program that allows the user to enter information of credit cards on an array of size 5, however I need to allow the user to compare the five credit cards with each other and I am having problems with this particular part. I made my bool operator functions for the operator< and the operator> but how to make the user be able to select which cards he wants to compare and how to compare them. My code is the following:
#include <iostream>
#include <fstream>
#include <string>
using namespace std;
const int SIZE = 5;
enum OPCIONES {CARGAR=1, ABONAR, NADA};
[Code] ......
Why can't I take the address of operators for primitives?
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
int main()
{
{
std::string (&plus)(std::string const&, std::string const&) = &std::operator+;
std::string a ("Hello, "), b("World!");
std::cout << plus(a, b) << std::endl;
[Code]...
[URL]....
I'm using this functionality in a templated class, do I really have to specialize for primitives or use std::enable_if?
What I'm trying to do is create a class for constructing an 'op tree' for parsing infix notation.
I started with a base class that uses a map of lambdas to actually calculate the operations (since they are mostly 1 line functions) of passed in integer or float values.
This base class just uses a templated T type as the lvalue and rvalue. I realized though that if I overload the math operators, +, -, etc.. I could also use the class itself as a type for the lvalue and rvalue. This lead me to think I could easily create the op tree by using Operation class members themselves as operands, which I think makes sense but I'm having some trouble expressing the code.
Heres what I have thus far
Code:
#include <map>
#include <string>
#include <algorithm>
#include <iostream>
namespace Calc {
[Code] .....
Example, if you look at the main() function I create normal operations easily with integer values. I then try to create a "tree" operation that includes 2 sub-operations as it's rvalue and lvalue, that is where I'm having some conceptual problems as far as implementing the code to do that.
what order a CPU would process the following arithmetic problem: 5 - (-9) = 14? Would the CPU recognize that the 'minus a minus' combination simply represents 5 + 9, and proceed with that addition, or would the CPU have to first calculate the 2's complement of -9, and then proceed to take the 2's complement of that first result in order to complete the calculation of the addition of the 'double negative'?
View 2 Replies View Related