I've been thinking over this for long time... For example, when a button is clicked, print a string "clicked" after 5 seconds. (the button won't be blocked)
If a class A contains an array of objects of another class B.. And in the constructor of A, while constructing objects of B, any one object throws an exception, then how can we guarantee to release all the memory acquired.. so that there is no memory leak..
class B{}; class A{ public: B Array[100]; ... };
In the above code, if in constructor of A, suppose 99 objects of B are constructed successfully, but 100th object throws exception, then how can we guarantee to release all the memory acquired by the other 99 objects?
I have a game that I'm trying to create but I don't really know how to handle mouse motions yet. I have read the LazyFoo.net lesson 9. And I have too searched around on Google but haven't find any good article for what I want to do
But what I want is to check if the mouse is OVER the START button of the game and if the user has pressed the LEFT mouse button the game should START.
This works when I am hovering over the area there I want the mouse to do something:
Code: else if (event.type == SDL_MOUSEMOTION) { if (event.motion.x == 0) { quit = true; } }
I do not know how to check this. The START and QUIT button is in the middle of the screen and I don't know how to position the mouse there either.
I am using SDL 2.0. But I don't know how to handle mouse input. Do you think you can explain of how to do that? Or give me a link that explains that really great?
I know how to handle a mouse button that presses down for a sec.
Code: if (event.type == SDL_MOUSEBUTTONDOWN){ if (event.button.button == SDL_BUTTON_LEFT){ // Do something . . . } }
But not how to handle the mouse input of what the mouse is hovering over and that.
Like in a start menu of a game. I want a button for example to appear blue when I hover over it and when I click on it. It should start the game for example.
I have an application that uses an array of threads to call a method along with thread.join(). I was just wondering what would be the best way to handle the thread in case if one of the thread fails? Should I put a try catch block on the method that is being called or should I put the try catch block on the array of threads, or is there any other proper way to handle failed threads?
I have an MFC program created from the app wizard. It is an MDI program, reading/writing text files using Serialize. I can read the document and know that the entire document was read into my buffer without any errors. This was verified by compaing the number of bytes read with the file length.
How do I get the document to display in my main/child window?
How do I read the document from the window so I can save it back to the file?
As we know in C there is no checking if values passed to a function that takes enum are correct, that is if they have been defined in this enum. Example from Enums in C | Occasionally sane ([code] tags don't work on my fx 18.0.1 this is why I put in on pb): [URL] ......
Here c - How to check if an enum variable is valid? - Stack Overflow they say that common convention is add check whether value passed as the parameter is not bigger than the maximum value in enum. But how about situations when enum is composed of numbers from 1-20 and then from 500-510?
I programming currently something with OpenGL. Now I have written some wrapper classes, like Shader, Program .... All works fine, but I don't like to call Shader.GetHandle() every time I want to call a OpenGL function manually where I need the object handle/id. (GetHandle() returns the OpenGL ID of the object)
So now I wonder, is it possible to program it in C++ so, that I can put my objects to gl methods and c++ automatically pass the handle/id member to that function ? Is there maybe a operator that I can use for that?
So I think I am having syntactical problem with my code.
Code: int main() { vector<int> ivec; int score; [Code] ....
I get an error from my compiler on the ?10th? line (Nested condition line) that says |19|error: invalid operands of types 'int' and '<unresolved overloaded function type>' to binary 'operator<<'|
The purpose of the program is to take input and store it in a vector and then change the value to be between 1-6. I made this for the purpose of learning about nested conditional operations.
If i do run the above program in turbo C/C++ complier, it outputs "h". But,if i change the code as i=0.6 and if (i<0.6), it outputs "w". Even if i change it to i=0.8 and if(i<0.8), then also it outputs "w".
Trying to write 4 bytes ints in a binary file and extract them after... I'm using the exclusive or (^) to isolate single bytes to write to and extract from the file since the write() function accepts only chars, only the beginning and end results are not the same...
when I input the character which is the underscore, and the row # it should display the table and sort that specific row. Why is the if statement skipped? This is not the complete program but has everything needed.
I've sometimes encountered unexpected runtime issues caused by unsigned values being decremented below zero.
Example 1: "unsigned_value += negative_integer_value;" Example 2: "for( size_t i = size - 1; i >= 0; --i )"
My compiler doesn't provide any compile-time or run-time warnings.
As far as I know, it's not possible to overload operators of primitive data types to check if the unsigned value is decremented below zero.
Any clever strategy to trace such cases at debug runtime, without having to add asserts all over the code? It's important that it does not affect performance in release mode.
In 2D games, what's the best way to handle the order of drawing objects? Because most games have a background, tiles to be drawn behind the player, perhaps tiles to be drawn covering up the player, etc. My point is, with my current setup of simply looping through all objects and drawing, I have no control over what objects are drawn on top of or behind the others. My best idea so far is to hold a vector of object pointers, each vector representing a different "visibility level", like so:
class Level{ //... std::vector<Object> allObjectInstances; std::vector<Object*> visibilityOne; //background objects std::vector<Object*> visibilityTwo; //objects in front of background but not necessarily all the way in front //and so on for more objects };
If I go through with this, I'm wondering how I could loop through all my objects and add them to each vector, then shorten whatever I have to loop through for subsequent visibility vectors. handling the order of drawing objects?
