I'm trying to make a template class which holds a template list I made. The list consists of template nodes (another template class I made).
My problem is that in some places (not everywhere) the compiler says that I'm trying to access private members of the node's class.
For example, if I define my node like this:
template<class T>
class CoefNode {
private:
T coef;
[Code]....
class intClass{};
class stringClass{};
template <typename T>
class Mediator {
// bunch of code
};
I want Mediator<int> to declare intClass friend, Mediator<std::string> to declare stringClass friend etc..., without having to redefine the entire specialization
template<>
Mediator<int>::friend intClass;
I have a template class which defines a few heavy methods. For now, they are defined in the same .h file as the class definition, but i`d like to have them in a separate .cpp file.
A situation i find you describe in the FAQs arises: [URL] ....
Problem: the export keyword has been deprecated in c++0x, if i recall correctly, and has never been implemented in any of the compilers i am using (msvc, gcc).
#Including the the .cpp file after the class definition (as described in the second post of the FAQ) works.
another question: i have methods that dont use any template code. Can i somehow declare them as such? (more of an esthecial question, which would make it easier to distinguish between template and non.template code).
Let say i have a following scenario:
a function like this.
Code:
template <typename T1>
print (T1 x){
cout << x << "
";
}
How do I prevent user passing a class or a structure or aanoter function to my function print. I mean i know if a wrong thing is passed that i'll get an error eventually but is there a way to explicitly check what has been passed. How is this done usually ?
I was creating a template and I realized that certain data-types/structs/classes would not be applicable to my template.This would cause bugs and errors if used incorrectly. Is there a way to restrict a template-capture to certain types/classes?
View 2 Replies View Relatedclass A {
// is abstract
};
class B : public A {
// ...
};
[Code] ....
[Code] ....
main3.cpp: In member function ‘FooB& FooB::operator=(const FooC&)’:
main3.cpp:46:44: error: expected ‘(’ before ‘other’
main3.cpp:46:49: error: no matching function for call to ‘Foo<C>::Foo(const FooC&)’
main3.cpp:46:49: note: candidates are:
main3.cpp:19:2: note: Foo<T>::Foo() [with T = C]
main3.cpp:19:2: note: candidate expects 0 arguments, 1 provided
main3.cpp:16:25: note: Foo<C>::Foo(const Foo<C>&)
main3.cpp:16:25: note: no known conversion for argument 1 from ‘const FooC’ to ‘const Foo<C>&’
Is there any way to make it work?
I want to create template of of Array in order to have possibility use this template for classes Line and Point.
Code:
// Array.h
// Templated Array class containging Ts
#ifndef Array_H
#define Array_H
template <class T=double> class Array {
[Code] .....
I have an array of (Student)classes created in Manager.h, which contains a new instance of class Name (name),(in Student.h)How would I go about accessing the SetFirstName method in Name.cpp if I was in a class Manager.cpp? I have tried using Students[i].name.SetFirstName("name");
// In Manager.h
#include"Student.h"
class Manager
{
[Code]....
I'm trying to implement a simple template array class, but when i came into the operator< i actually have to use a template :
my code is something like :
template<typename _Type, std::size_t _Size>
class array {
public :
[Code] ......
but i am having an error of shadows template param 'class _Type' is it w/ the name conflict between the array template parameter and the function template parameter ?
Error1error C2955: 'DoubleLinkedListInterface' : use of class template requires template argument listdoublelinkedlist.h10
Error2error C2244: 'DoubleLinkedList<T>::DoubleLinkedList' : unable to match function definition to an existing declaration doublelinkedlist.cpp7
Error3 .cpperror C2244: 'DoubleLinkedList<T>::~DoubleLinkedList' : unable to match function definition to an existing declaration 12
.h
#pragma once
#include "DoubleLinkedListInterface.h"
#include "Node.h"
#include <iostream>
[Code]....
I have a generic template class with another template in one of its types. Now I want to specialize one of its methods for a particular (template) class, which leads to a compile error, however.
Here is the example:
#include <stdio.h>
template<typename Type>
class Obj1 {
public:
void ID() { printf("Object 1, size = %zu
[Code] .....
GCC ends with:
:35:27: error: type/value mismatch at argument 2 in template parameter list for ‘template<class Type, template<class> class O> class Foo’
:35:27: error: expected a class template, got ‘Obj2<Type>’
What is wrong with the specialization? Can it even be achieved and how (if so)?
how I want the code to look. Only problem is it doesn't work (Line 11). I have some experience with templates but I'm not a pro.
Basically I want the "Channels<3>" to be a type that I can use to specify a Cable with similar to vector<float/int> it would be Cable<Channels<2 or 3>>.
What have I messed up with the syntax?
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
using namespace std;
[Code].....
I have a function:
template<class Iterator, class T>
void a(Iterator, Iterator, const T&);
and I want to be able to simplify calls to 'a' with calls like
a(someIteratableContainer);
instead of having to call:
a(someIteratableContainer.begin(), someIteratableContainer.end(), valueOfTheContainersElementType);
I also want to be able to generalize the function to handle any of the standard iteratable contains: array, vector, deque, whatever.
I was under the impression I could write:
template<template<class T> class U> a(U<T>& container) {
a(container.begin(), container.end(), g(T()));
}
where 'g()' returns an object of the element type. However, the compiler is claiming, no matter how I write a call to the overload, the original template is selected and/or the overload is invalid, depending on the various ways I attempt to write said overload.
[URL]
#include <iostream>
struct Outer {
template<typename T>
void go() {
std::cout << Test<T>::f() << std::endl;
[Code] .....
I have tried several variants on this code to no avail. Outer is in a header, along with the extern template statements, and the specializations after main are in their own cpp file. Main is in a different cpp file.
What do have to do to make this work? I cannot bring the definitions of f() into the header, and they will be different for different template parameters. Ideally, I want Test to remain a private member of Outer, though this can change if it's the only option.
I have been trying to get a hang on templates. I have the two following functions that that could be consolidated in a single template function:
void Attractor::updateFamilies(FamiliesController *_tmp, int _counter){
center.x = ofGetWidth()/2;
center.y = ofGetHeight()/3;
attractorCounter = _counter;
if(attractorCounter == 1){
[Code] .....
NotesController and FamiliesController have the same parent. The thing that I'm trying to grasp with templates is that is could something like:
template<class TYPE>
void Attractor::updateData(TYPE* *_tmp, int _counter){
center.x = ofGetWidth()/2;
center.y = ofGetHeight()/3;
attractorCounter = _counter;
[Code] ....
And then have another template function declaration for all the attractor functions where I pass the same template value as in the first one.
As you can see, I'm calling another functions inside called attractors(_tmp). I know that one way around it could be to get rid of that function and just do all the logic inside of each if statement. Is there any way to pass the same template function parameter within a template function parameter?
I have a class like this
PHP Code:
template<class X>
class A {
X m_x;
public:
X* foo();
X* bar();
//others are not related to X
};
I would like to get rid of
PHP Code: template<class X>
For class level but still use it for members. Like this
PHP Code:
class A {
X m_x;
public:
template<class X>
X* foo();
template<class X>
X* bar();
//others are not related to X
};
However, I am still stuck at
PHP Code: X m_x;
Let me put it into the code snippet:
/**
This class build the singleton design pattern.
Here you have full control over construction and deconstruction of the object.
*/
template<class T>
class Singleton
[Code]....
I am getting error at the assertion points when i call to the class as follows:
osgOpenCL::Context *cxt = osgOpenCL::Singleton<osgOpenCL::Context>::getPtr();
I tried commenting assertion statements and then the debugger just exits at the point where getPtr() is called.
Given:
#include <string>
template <class T>
class basic_container{
[Code] .....
is this possible:
#include "../basic_container/basic_container.hpp"
template <class T>
class container_vector{
[Code] .....
If not, what do I need to do to achieve my goal?
I want to know that how objects of two different classes interact with each other???
View 1 Replies View RelatedIn this program the intention is to create a menu driven program for a pizza restaurant. I have to use a class called Pizza and have to include at least three public functions; one is called SetSize, another one is called Display, and the last one is called ComputePrice. A small pizza is worth $10, a medium is $14, and a large is $17. Each topping is worth 2 dollars. I know that the program runs correctly, but I have doubts over the classes and function actually being utilized correctly or at all.
Program:
#include <iostream>
#include <iomanip>
#include <cmath>
using namespace std;
class Pizza {
private:
int size;
int style;
[Code] .....
I'm trying to use multiset with a user defined class "edge". I'm trying to use the multiset as a priority queue, and I've created a "less<edge>" via operator<() overloading.
For some reason, I cannot insert edges into the multiset.
I understand that I might also have to create an "allocator". I got some ideas for creating it at [URL], but still don't know how to define size_type and difference_type.
Attached is my skeleton code, running on Windows 7 (32-bit), under Netbeans IDE, using Cygwin g++ 4.7.3.
How can I get this to work? What is important is that I get a priority queue working with my edges, prioritized by the weight.
#include <iostream>
#include <set> // for multiset
using namespace std; // assume std libraries (i.e. std::XXX)
class edge { // node, weight pair
public:
[Code].....
I've created a base DLL for all my future DLL's, a way of getting version numbers and such and that compiles fine, but I can't add it into a class for a new DLL. All the headers do have an appropriate cpp to define the function declarations (and they compile fine).
All for the base DLL I have:
LibVer.h
Version.cpp
Function.cpp
LibVer.h
#pragma once
#include <vector>
#define DLLEXPORT 1
#define DLLIMPORT 2
#define DLL DLLIMPORT
[Code] .....
im creating an address book. One address book contains a ListBox, New User button, Edit User and Remove User button. The first form is suppose to allow you to view the users you've created on the ListBox and you can decide whether you want to remove it, create a new one or simply edit the user. Now The second form simply contains labels and textbox along with a save button. I'm having a bit of issue figuring out the ListBox. I want to be able to create a user and have the user be posted on the ListBox. I read that i must instantiate listbox then simply add it. Now on my form2 i have a for loop that loops through an Array of String were all the users will be created on. How can i call that array of string on to the form1?
Form 1:
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.ComponentModel;
using System.Data;
using System.Drawing;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
[code].....
EDIT:I just figured out that to call a variable from one form to another you simply instantiate the form then simply call it. PS. must be set to public:
ListBox1 createUser = new ListBox1();
createUser.userString[0];
why doesnt it show the windows when i run without debugging?
n the requirements it says this;
-create a get and set for height, width, length.
-A default parameterized constructor = 1
-A method to resize the box
-A method to get the volume of the box
-A method to convert the object to a string
My Questions:
The 3 parts I am confused by are the default parameter constructor, the re-size the box and the method to convert to string. For the default parameter part I figured making length, width and height = to 1 would work, but I'm pretty sure thats not what I'm supposed to do.
This is the main file
#include "box_class.h"
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
int main() {
double length;
double width;
double height;
double volume;
[Code] ......
I am just wondering what the best practice is for when to use static classes (by static class, I mean a class which has only static attributes and functions).
If you are creating more than one independent object of a particular class, then obviously this should not be static because each object will be the same. But what about the case when you know that you will only ever need one instance of a class? On its own, does this mean that you should create it as a static class?
Personally, I use static class when I want its member attributes and functions to be available globally, which I think is fine. However, I am not sure about the case when I know that only one object will be created - should this be a static class or not?
I'm working on a project involving nested classes and structs like this:
Code: class A {
public:class B {
public:f()
{A::C* iCanDoThis; //no errors.
iCanAlsoDoThis->root->.... //this also works fine.}private:A::C* iCannotDoThis //this is what I would like to do.
Has errors
A* iCanAlsoDoThis;};private:struct C
{..data..};
C* root;};
Is it possible make a pointer to struct C a private member of class B?
