When I tested it, the file name in getName() outputted the right file name. However the file name in loadName() does not print out anything in the console window.
I want it to be so that the strings in [I]name_addTXT.c_str() in both functions are equal.
In general, my problem is that I've been trying to reorganize the project I and my group are working on into separate project files. Everything was working perfectly fine before, but now I'm facing the wrath of undefined reference errors when I try to call my DLL functions.
I have them declared and included in the central header file here :
Code:
/* DLL functions */ typedef void ( * t_wait )( int milliseconds, const int frames_per_seconds ); typedef clock_t ( * ft_timer )( int command, t_timer * timer_object ); /* clock_t is usually defined as long */ typedef void ( * t_SDL_errorexit )( const char * message ); typedef SDL_Surface * ( * t_load_image )( char * image_path, unsigned is_transparent );
[Code]...
Then I have them imported here :
Code: /* ******************************************************** */ /* ********* win_error( char *, bool ) ********* */ /* ******************************************************** */ /* - Displays a GUI for a windows specific error message, */ /* pass true to it to have it exit the program, pass false */ /* to have it continue */ /* ******************************************************** */ extern void win_error( char * message, bool is_exit ) { /* Note : win_error uses the Win32 Api */ /* ********************************** */ char buffer[BUFSIZ] = { 0 }; /*
[code]...
This doesn't work, as my compiler sees it that I am trying to call invalid functions, whereas I have made sure to import the functions before calling. Obviously my compiler can't tell that, and is trying to protect me from calling them.
The source files are compiled as C++, but I'm using C-style code instead of true C++ code.
Obviously I'm using Windows style DLL linking, but if the only ways to share imported functions are non-standard, only post ways that will work on as low as Windows XP.
I have tried to statically link them before, but that led to a problem that I posted a while back. Which led me to dynamically linking, which was problem-free until I separated my code into separate files.
I'm a little confused by my programming assignment this week. I've been working at it Wednesday and I've made progress but I'm still confused as to how I'm supposed to do this. The class I made is called Stack, and it's derived from a template class called StackADT. We also utilize a class called unorderedLinkedList, which is derived from a class called linkedList.
We're supposed to implement all of the virtual functions from stackADT in the Stack class. The Stack data is stored in a an unorderedLinkedList, so what I'm confused by is how to implement a few of the Stack functions because there are no functions in unorderedLinkedList which we could call to manipulate the data.
As you can see from my attached code, I'm really confused by how I'm supposed to implement the pop() and top() functions, and I also think my initializeList() function is wrong. We don't have any similar functions in unorderedLinkedList to call, so I'm at a loss of how i'd access my unorderedLinkedList. My initial thought was to call the similar functions in the class that unorderedLinkedList was derived from, linkedList, but I'm unsure of this is what we're supposed to do, or if theres actually a way to access my unorderedLinkedList without having to use the functions from the base class.
NOTE: We're not allowed to modify stackADT, unorderedLinkedList, and linkedList.
Stack.h
#include "stackADT.h" #include "unorderedLinkedList.h" template<class Type> class Stack: public stackADT<Type>{ template <class T> struct nodeType { T info; nodeType<T> *link;
But now I'm trying to use this to point to a function inside a class so instead of do11, i want to be able to point to Basic.Do11. Somehow this doesnt work and I keep on getting this message:
error: argument of type 'void (Basic::)()' does not match 'void (*)()'
Say in my main class, I have a function fight(Player p1, Player p2) and I would like to do something like this in the fight function, given that p1 is the human and p2 is the computer:
//function fight() fight(Player p1, Player p2) { p1.func2(); } //using function fight() fight(human, computer);
When I compile the program, I got this: error: ‘class Player’ has no member named 'func2()' What can I do to allow p1 to call func2 inside fight()? I'm not allowed to use pointers as the parameter for fight() and have to use the signature fight(Player p1, Player p2).
The compiler creates virtual table for the base class and also for the derived class whether we override it or not.
That means each class has separate virtual table. when we get the size of the each class with out any data members... the size of base is -- 4 bytes(64 bit) and the size of derived is -- 1
The size of base class 4 is correct since it creates the virtual pointer internally and its size is member data + virtual pointer, but it in this case I have included any data members so it has given 4 byts.
But why in case of derived is 1 byte, since it the derived class has overridden the virtual function from base, this will also contains the virtual pointer which will be pointing to derived class Vtable, it the size of the class suppose to be 4 instead of 1 byte.
Write a function named cointoss that simulates the tossing of a coin.
When you call the function, it should generate a random number in the range of 1 through 2.
If the random number is 1, the function should display "heads".
If the random number is 2, the function should display "tails".
Demonstrate the function in a program that asks the user how many times the coin should be tossed, and then simulates tossing the coin that number of times.
I am trying to get some confirmation about how to pass to functions. If you want to assign default values to certain parameters, and have others defined inside the body of int main(), then the parameters which will have default values go at the end of the list. Is that correct?
i.e. The following code is wrong, because we cannot leave a black in the function call on the third line of the main function. However, if we switch the prototype to void Passing (int a, int c, int b = 1); and the function definition to void Passing (int a , int c, int b) everything will be okay and we can call the function as Passing (a, c).
In brief, we cannot do this EVER: Passing( a, , c)right? #include <iostream> using namespace std;
I was given an assignment where I have to input two points (four integers) on a Cartesian plane from a file and then process it using functions. My professor is very particular so the comments are a bit excessive, but here's what I have.
double radiusFn(double, double, double, double);//4 double values, one for each point. All points are needed for the calculation of distance in this function. double diameterFn(double);//Only uses one double value - the radius. Both functions below use the same value. double circumferenceFn(double); double areaFn(double); int main() {
What "int values" is supposed to mean as parameters to these functions? I'm not sure what do with them. Also how to input values into the array via functions. I was trying to but I just don't understand how to connect a user's input to a function to then enter into an array.
// input reads “values” integers from the user to place in the array data. It prompts the user for each value individually with the ordinal position of the value. void input (int data [size], int values); // Places the sum of corresponding values from arrays a and b and places the results in array s. The first “values” integers in the array are processed. void do_sums (int a [size], int b [size], int s [size], int values);
This code is for fun, and have it doing a lot of what I want it to, just not all. I want random generated to write to a txt file. I tried to use an array but that failed. I wanted to use an array because i am only passing one value. Which makes sense since the random generated function is an int.
I made the fprintf as a comment but hopefully soon it will be able to send the values to the txt file. After that I will tackle the function.
Code:
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <time.h> #define HIGH 49 #define LOW 1 int random_generated()
I am trying to understand RValue-references as return values of functions. First let's consider a simple function, that transforms a string into upper case letters.
It compiles, but I get the output 0 . Here I am wondering why the code above does not move the substr correctly while the code below does (prints out 1):
In both cases abc is a temporary object inside of the function and gets deleted after the function is left. But why does the second version work and the first one does not?
#include <iostream> #include "curve1.h" #include "curve2.h" using namespace std; int main() { Curve1 curve1Obj; Curve2 curve2Obj;
[Code]...
Base class Score has two derived classes Curve1 and Curve2. There are two curve() functions, one is in Curve1 and other in Curve2 classes. getSize() returns the value of iSize.
My base class header score.h looks like this:
#ifndef SCORE_H #define SCORE_H class Score { private: int *ipScore; float fAverage; int iSize;
[Code]...
You can see that I have used curve1Obj to enter scores, calculate average and output. So if I call getSize() function with cuve1Obj, it gives the right size that I took from user in enterScores() function. Also the result is same if I call getSize() in score.cpp definition file in any of the functions (obviously). .....
The problem is when I call curve() function of Curve2 class in main (line 23) with the object curve2Obj, it creates a new set of ipScore, fAverage and iSize (i think?) with garbage values. So when I call getSize() in curve() definition in curve2.cpp, it outputs the garbage. .....
How can I cause it to return the old values that are set in curve1.cpp?
Here is my curve2.cpp
#include <iostream> #include "curve2.h" using namespace std; void Curve2::curve() { cout << "getSize() returns: " << getSize() << endl; // out comes the garbage }
Can I use a function to simply put values from old to new variables? If yes then how?
After compiling, I cannot understand why my getMost and getLeast functions are returning erroneous values. I've done everything I could think of to try and fix this, Problem and code below.
A local zoo wants to keep track of how many pounds of food each of its three monkeys eats each day during a typical week. Write a program that stores this information in a twodimensional 3 * 7 array, where each row represents a different monkey and each column represents a different day of the week. The program should rst have the user input the data for each monkey. Then it should create a report that includes the following information:
* Average amount of food eaten per day by the whole family of monkeys. * The least amount of food eaten during the week by any one monkey. * The greatest amount of food eaten during the week by any one monkey.
Input Validation: Do not accept negative numbers for pounds of food eaten.
this last few days I've been coding this one particular file
Hero.cpp
namespace Hero { namespace { // all data here } }
then the code grew a bit to about 700 line
Then now I want to implement hero skill system It needs the access to data inside the unnamed namespace where I put just about everything.. but it's unnamed namespace, it's only valid within one file and I should hide all that data from Hero interface in Hero.h How should I do this ?
Basically i'm willing to create an application which could share Video,Mp3 Over the internet to my friends.
For suppose I'm hosting file on my PC, and i want to share "D" Drive to my friends but they aren't connected to my network locally. i want to share movies over the internet using a host and client application in c#.net.
the purpose of this application is very clear that that i want to share movies over the internet and they have to be able to watch movies on their PCs Except running my PC remotely.
Just a few moments ago i was just doing foolish things in c++ and discovered something new. Though some of you might have known this, for those who dont know, take a look at the follwing 2 small programs,
so here is my problem. i think u wud have figured out what m trying to do above. am actually calling the main() of the class and from there, i want to call the usual main... the problem is, during A.main()'s run, if i refer to main(); , that call represents itself, that it, it is like it calls itself. How on earth can i call the outside main?
