My coin/money change code works when there can be an exact change each time, i.e. when the 1 cent option is available. However, when the change options are only $10, $5, $1, 25 cents and 10 cents, it does not give me what I want for instance, I wanted to get change for $237.80, I was expecting to get:
23 10's, one 5, two 1's and 8 dimes. However, the code below is giving me 23 10's, one 5, two 1's and 3 quarters (there is no option left for the 5 remaining cents).how to fix it?
Code: #include<iostream> #include<algorithm> #include<vector> using namespace std; void change(double cents, int a[]); int main() { double Dollars; double cents;
I am trying to change the value of of time in my vector of structs. The result should output 1430 as the value of shares[1].time though I get something different.
when i pass a string pointer to a function such as string *str = new string(""); and pass that string to a handleElement() function e.g. handleElement(str), and i change the value in the function it simply doesn't change when the function exits as though it's passing it by value or something, even though it gives the pointer address.. I've now changed the code to use double pointers and pass the reference of the str pointer and it works but it seems ugly to use double pointers for this.
//handles when a new element is encountered when parsing and adds it to the parse tree bool ParseBlock::handleElement(char cur, string *curString, int count, bool isOperator) { countNode = new ParseNode(count); //keep track of numbers and strings if they exist and insert them if(!curString->empty()){ if(isNumber(*curString)
How to get relative memory address of members of Class or Structure ? I want to auto scan the members of Class/Struct, and show the address/value like the "watch window" in debug mode of popular C/C++ IDE software.
Suppose I have two classes, MyClassX and MyClassY, each with two member variables, as defined below. I create an object instance of each class, and then create a pointer to each member variable for each object:
Code: class MyClassX { public: int a; double b; MyClassX(int _a, double _b)
[code]....
After converting the hexadecimal to decimal, it appears that with MyClassX, pxb is 8 bytes from pxa, whereas for MyClassY, pya is only 4 bytes from pyb. This makes sense for MyClassY, because the first member variable to be stored is an int, and so will occupy 4 bytes. However, why should this be any different for MyClassX, which also has an int as the first member variable, so shouldn't this also occupy 4bytes?
The reason I have come across this problem is that I am looking into streaming objects to memory and then loading them again. (I know boost can do this, but I am trying it out myself from scratch.) Therefore, this is causing an issue, because I cannot just assume that the size of memory occupied by an object is just the sum of the sizes of its member variables. MyClassX is 8 bytes larger than MyClassY, even though the intuition is that it should only occupy 4 bytes more due to a double being replaced by an int.
I wrote a program to write text contents to file stream through fputs, the file stream address was changed in the middle of writing text content to the stream (11% text content have been put into the file stream), that cause the file stream pointer can be evaluated problem and raise exception on stream validation code in fputs library function, my question is what things could go wrong to make file stream pointer changed its address to something else or a NULL pointer if the file stream have not been flushed and closed.
I've been working on a project that involves storing pointers to dynamically allocated class objects in an STL list, but trying to run it something's going wrong.
But it seems like that has a memory leak. Does pop_front() just call the destructor for the object, or will it delete a dynamically allocated chunk of memory? If not, how can I do that deletion to avoid a memory leak?
Im trying to create a function that searches my array for a specific string, and then displays that string and the other content associated with it. I'm basically searching for a keyword within an array that has multiple strings with in each element.
I need to create function Sum() that calculates sum between two containers. Code below work fine except function Sum between two containers...
How I should re - write my code that everything work fine.
Condition of exercise is : "Also create a Sum() function that calculates the sum between two iterators. The function then uses the template argument for the iterator type and accepts two iterators, the start- and end iterator"
1>------ Build started: Project: HP2_ex2_iter, Configuration: Debug Win32 ------ 1> main.cpp 1>c:all myс++ha level 7solutionlevel 7 homework overview of the standard template libraryhp2_ex2_itermain.cpp(47): error C2275: 'C1' : illegal use of this type as an expression
So i made an STL compatible container.And to make this work I had to make my own iterator (derived from std::iterator).
What is the portable (if any) and "well behaved" thing to do in case of usage anomalies.such as iterating an iterator too far, or passing an invalid index to a operator[]
Looking at how VC++ does things in something like std::array or std::vector.
Code:
iterator_type& operator+=(difference_type offset) {// increment by integer #if _ITERATOR_DEBUG_LEVEL == 2 if (size < index + offset) {// report error
[Code] .....
lots of names starting with underscores, so it's implementation specific. Is there even a "well behaved" thing to do ? Or is any such work always going to be compiler specific?
where num1 and num2 are arbitrary numbers. and Terrain is the class of objects I'm trying to store.
I want to be able to use push_back on both the main vector and the vectors within the mapArray vector but I'm unsure of how to target the inner vectors with push_back. How to dynamically store a 2D array of objects.
I am looking for direction on what topic I should be reading up on. I am new to C++ and Windows MFC.
This is my real world problem, in the context of the application user. (these term do not refer to OPP concepts)
I want to create shapes (containers) in an application that will respond and collect other objects;
Imagine a Windows frame, containing several 2 dimensional squares. I want to be able to drag and drop marbles into the squares,and have the square retain and display the marbles in the square, in the order that they were dropped in.
How do I create the shapes, and how will the square sense when a marble is over it?
How would I create irregular shapes (a combination of lines and curves) that would be responsive to the marbles?
Suppose I'm writing a program designed to simulate a large company. I'm interested in tracking each company employee by the location where they work. This company has perhaps a thousand different locations:
class Employee { public: AccessorFunction1(); // does something AccessorFunction2(); // does something different AccessorFunction3(); // does something completely different protected: // Some data
[code]....
Once employees are created and pointers to them are saved in the proper Location vector, I write an accessor function, OrganizeLocation(), designed to do a number of operations on a given vector. The problem is, I have maybe a thousand vectors. How do I call this function and specify which vector I want?
Currently, I'm using this clunky solution:
void Company::OrganizeLocation(int a){ switch(a) { case 1: { for(unsigned int i=0; i<LocationA.size(); i++) { LocationA[i]->AccessorFunction1(); LocationA[i]->AccessorFunction2(); LocationA[i]->AccessorFunction3();
[code]....
The key point here is that whichever vector I choose to operate upon, I'll do the exact same procedure every time. I hate this solution because it results in very long and repetitive code not to mention its very error-prone when you re-editing all those "LocationA 's into "LocationB/C/D/etc."
Or, if it can't be done in C++, is there a better design approach? Ultimately I need the Company object to hold multiple vectors but use one compact accessor function to perform operations on just one of them.
I get the following error in XCode whenever I try to access the member I created 'randomGen' in a separate class in a different header file. I have made sure to include the header file and have tried to access it through an object.
This is the code I enter when trying to access the method from randomiser.h in main.cpp. It is also an overloaded function with doubles and integers:
RandomG randomiser; randomiser.randomGen(); // 'Call to member function 'randomGen' is ambiguous'
This is the code inside randomiser.h:
#include <string> #include <iostream> using std::string; using std::cout; using std::endl; class RandomG {
[Code] ....
This is the error inside xcode: [URL] ....
I have tried seperating the code for the functions in another class (main.cpp) and then running and it seems to works, so I'm not sure why I can't put everything in the .h file and then access it?
I would like it in a seperate file so it doesn't clutter my main. I am writing a game with SDL so that might be confusing and I would like the window to have a random title and other random properties, so it would be easier to use a function.
I just dont see what the issue is here. I have stared at this thing forever. Im trying to make a calendar from scratch so I can be prepared for my second test on Friday.
Code: #include<stdio.h> #include<stdlib.h> int main(void) { int i, n, s;
So, ArrayList *myList should return a pointer to the new arraylist or null if malloc fails. what exactly I need to set my maximum to, I know that it shouldn't be 0 and array[i] doesn't seem to be working either. I also am not sure if I am properly setting up null correctly for my array.
#include <iostream> #include <string> using namespace std ; int main() { string bored ; do { cout << " program" <<endl ;
[Code] .....
I made this as a simple do/while program, and if i run it, the second do/while statement will keep on going forever, without the [cin >> bored;] line working?
I just wanna have a very simple function that reads values from a text file row by row. The first value is passed along from the stringstream to my float data[] but after that it doesn't pass along anything. The strange part (for me at least) is that the stringstream contains the values it should contain, but they doesn't wanna end up in data[].
I've implemented it a bit differently: I create 2 temporary arrays, one for the numbers lower from the pivot , an done for numbers greater then the pivot. in the end of each iteration the 2 arrays are copied to the original array:
Code: #include <iostream> void QuickSort (int* A , int start, int end){ if (end-start<3){ return; } int mid=(start+end)/2; int pivot=A[mid]; int lA[end-start] , rA[end-start], rCounter=0,lCounter=0; int curr=0,i=start;
Numbers are 3d6 Rolling die no.1... RolledDie: 4 DieTotal: 4 Rolling die no.2... RolledDie: 5 DieTotal: 9 Rolling die no.3... RolledDie: 5 DieTotal: 14
I am trying to release my C++ app to run on desktops that dont have VS installed and have created an install shield app to install on the desired computer. my issue is even after packaging it, it still requires certain DLL's...I read online that I had to copy 'msvcr120.dll' and a few others to syswow64 and sys32 folders but now when I try run my app it just crashes before starting.
I think it sucks that Microsoft no longer packages required DLL's like it used to in 2010.
I'm trying to build a new project and i installed some new libraries in it but when i try to compile any code it doesn't give me any value just press any key to continue, i didn't make any files but one and even if i tried to do this simple task it doesn't cout any result:
#include<iostream> using namespace std; int main() { cout <<("ha"); system("pause"); return 0; }
