Still working with SDL2 and c++ my map collision is messed up since I implemented my Camera.
I do understand that everything has a relative Position on the Screen, depending on the camera.
Problem No. 1: The camera is not moving as fast as the Player, despite having the absolutly same velocity (4/-4)??? How can this be O_o
Problem No. 2: My tile collision is totally messed now. Probably its because of the difference between the Player Position and the camera :/ So if you can solve Problem no. 1, Problem number 2 might work out on its own :)
I've been working on my 2D platformer for a while, and I'm running into a couple of problems. It seems to become laggy even when only about 25 entities need to do collision detection with the 8 walls in the area.
Only one thing to note: the BOOST_FOREACH(const Edge& edge, this->GetCollisonBoxEdges()) { sections actually aren't a loop, all players and enemies are basically a vertical line for purposes of hitting walls, so that's why there is some weird stuff in there (like assuming the edge is oriented a certain way, etc).
I'm still working on my Project and the next Problem has occured: How do I detect collisions on a tilebased map? My tiles are 16x16 and the map is based on the tutorial of [URL] ..... I really like this Approach because I can define for each tile of what type it should be (so a earth tile can be walkable and lead to a secret passage).
The first Number stands for what Kind of tile it should be (e.g. Grass, Earth, Water, Blank,...) and the number after ":" stands for the type of the tile (e.g. solid, walkable, do dmg to the Player,...).
e.g. 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 //No tile and walkable 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 1:1 1:1 1:1 1:1 1:1 //Grass tile and solid 2:1 2:1 2:1 2:1 2:1 //Earth tile and solid
It's working just fine with loading the Images, but i've got no clue about the collision. I've already read a lot of stuff on the Internet but I don't get how to Combine it the structure from above. For example lazyfoo describes the collision with one object like one wall. So how can I check the Player Position with each tile?
For now there's no camera, but I plan to implement one later...
I'm making a 2D Terraria-like (side-scrolling RPG with destroyable blocks) game with SFML 2.1, and I have no clue how to correctly implement collision detection. Meaning that I have been successful at making it work, but it's not clean and definitely not dynamic.
By example, I mean design wise. What parameters should collision functions take? Where should these functions be located? The same 2 questions for collision reaction. Since I have multiple things that need to collide with each other (player with enemy, player with items, enemy with items, enemy with enemy, player with player, etc...), and the world has to be treated differently, things get complicated. There is no block class, just a vertex array, so collision with the world is based purely on coordinates taken from that array in the world class, which, considering it's the world and not something like a player or an enemy, doesn't inherit from the same base class that they do.
I have made a simple 2d shooter (bird eye view) and want implementing the collision detection between the monsters and bullets. The problem is as follows
Each monster has locationX, locationY as coordinates. Each monster has a Rectangle representing its collision box, (if bullet inside rectangle then its a collision). Each bullet has locationX, locationY as coordinates as well.
pretty standard up till now.
each frame I need to check if some bullet collided with some monster.
the brutal force is to keep a list of all the bullets and monsters and to check the possibility of collision between all of them which takes O(#bullets * #monsters).
Let say h(0)=01 and h(1)=10 and let say our first string is w=0 h(w)=01, h^2(w)=0110 h^3(w)=01101001..etc.
We have used h map, which is given in the program comment statement. Same thing, program is doing for three letters. These three letters we have passed as argument in h_i function. e.g. h_i(2,w,"a","d","g") function will apply the 3 letter map h(definition is given in commented form in program) 2 times on string w.
In program w=a; and three letters are a, d and g. /* h(a)=abcab,h(b)=acabcb,h(c)=acbcacb */ here b=d and c=g.
Above program gives core dump at free(w2) free(w1). if we remove these free statements then it gives correct answer. But, we want to free w1 and w2 in the above code. How can we make free both w1 and w2 strings?
how is the best way to free unsigned pointer array allocated with cmallc?
Code:
uint8_t *buf; buf = cs_calloc(ca->len + 13);
i do like this , but i know this is not quite right , since i got compile warning passing argument 1 of ‘free’ makes pointer from integer without a cast
Code:
for (i = 0; i < ca->len + 13; i++) { free(buf[i]); buf[i] = NULL; }
free(buf); do i need to free each element of array like above?
I'm trying to free allocated memory for structure. It seems like free() gets only pointer and not regular types . my question is basic and simple – is passing pointer to free() frees the pointer or the variable it points at? or both?
I don't use Visual Studio and/or C++ so I would like to do it without them. I found this article c++ - How to determine CPU and memory consumption from inside a process? - Stack Overflow
I tried some lines of code but no one works for me.
I'm currently trying to write a program that takes an integer input from the user and displays that number of square-free numbers. I've gotten most of the program to work, but I encounter an error during the noSquare function that causes it to print incorrectly.
A square-free number is a number that is not evenly divisible by the square of any prime number. It's hard to see the bold in the code area, but it begins after the "//I think below is where the problem is"
#include <iostream> #include <vector> using namespace std;
I'm currently trying to write a program that takes an integer input from the user and displays that number of square-free numbers. I've gotten most of the program to work, but I encounter an error during the noSquare function that causes it to print incorrectly. I have bolded the area where I believe the problem is what I am doing wrong.
The problem with the program is that it prints ALL numbers from 1 to the input number instead of just the square-free.
A square-free number is a number that is not evenly divisible by the square of any prime number ....
#include <iostream> #include <vector> using namespace std; bool noSquare (int num); //Function to determine if the number is square-free vector<int> getPrimes(int num); //Function to get a vector of all primes below num bool isPrime (int number); //Function to determine if individual numbers are prime int main()
[Code]...
By the way, the in the middle of the code was me trying to bold a section, not an actual part of the code. I can't seem to find where to edit my original post.
I'm struggling with the whole stack/heap thing. I totally see the need to create objects on the free store to outlive functions, however, I don't see the purpose of "new" when working with classes.
Code: class Person{ public: Person(std::string strName, int number); ~Person(void);
Resource r;
[Code] .....
Now, what is the difference? Why would I need to create a Resource on the free store? Both variables named r live until the destructor runs, right?
Code: [harshvardhan@hari-rudra] ~/Desktop% gcc49 -o test test.c [harshvardhan@hari-rudra] ~/Desktop% ./test -before Value of len = 1 (in_function)-before Value of len = 1 (in_function)-after Value of len = 1
-after Value of len = 1 I was trying to make a little easier to work with string. Once the memory is allocated by malloc via sb_init() function, the sb_massacre function wasn't working to deallocate the memory. I had used multiple versions of gcc and clang but the result is same.
This directory "H:C" does exist, if I comment out the GetDiskFreeSpaceExA line, the program doesn't crash, but it leads to some peculiar results (some uninitialized and random value, but at least it doesn't crash)
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> typedef struct { unsigned long long int address; float current; unsigned char pressure_units; }
[code]....
But I don't like how I had to use malloc and free. Is there a different way to accomplish copying the string into a char pointer without resorting to dynamic memory allocation?
I am trying to compare performance of different lock-free queues, therefore, I want to create a stress test - which includes pushing/popping user-defined pre-built objects to and from the queue. My question is how can perform the stress test with pushing and popping objects instead of pointers to object like I have done in my code. What is the different in terms of performance of pushing/popping objects Vs. pushing/popping pointers.
My application calls malloc in multiple subroutines, finally releasing all using free. This is done using my zalloc library (see my other post: [URL] .....
Somehow, when the applications tries to detect the available ammount of memory at the end of the test (allocating, freeing, testing), the freemem function gives me about 4-6MB less memory than at the start of the test? (out of 21MB available on the device at the start).
All memory is allocated and freed using the malloc/free routines within the library, with the exception of the SDL functions, which are registered externally on allocation and release.
