In Visual Studios I keep getting this error. cpp(36): error C4700: uninitialized local variable 'Eligible' used
Code:
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <iomanip>
#include <fstream>
#include <cmath>
using namespace std;
void Getinput(int& Loantype, double& Income, double& Totaldebt, double& Loanamount);
[Code] ....
I keep getting the "Uninitialized Local Variable" error. But for my code it's says it's the variable 'pay' in my Manager Function. This is the only error that is popping up.
I've tried setting pay to 0 but when I do, I get a bunch of external errors. I've also tried assigning pay to WeeklySalary like this:
double pay = WeeklySalary;
//Calculating pay for a company
#include <iostream>
#include <iomanip>
using namespace std;
//Function prototypes
double managerFunction();
double hourlyWorkerFunction();
double commissionWorkerFunction();
[Code] .....
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
struct WeatherStats {
double total_rainfall;
int high_temp;
int low_temp;
int avg_temp;
[Code] ....
When I run this program I am able to input data for the three months but after inputting everything I am prompted with a run time error that states: Run time check failure#3: The variable 'temp' is being used without being initialized. I've underlined the statement that the compiler says is causing this error, yet there is no variable 'temp' in that statement.
Computer are very specific right? So in the problem statement total_yearly_temp = total_yearly_temp + temp.avg_temp; there is a variable called total_yearly_temp and one called temp.avg_temp, but there are none called temp. It can't be complaining about the WeatherStats variable I defined in the first line of the function called temp because I did the exact same thing in the previous function and there are no errors concerning that.
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
namespace Furniture {
class Program {
static void Main(string[] args)
[Code] ....
I tried changing the type of variable to char but i still get the same result. i also tried using a switch statement which was my first choice but i had the same issue.
i always get error case bypasses initialization of a local variable
here's my coding
my header files
Code: #include <stdio.h>
#include <conio.h>
#include <iostream.h>
#include <fstream.h>
[Code].....
i'm using borland c++ v5.02
i have highlighted the errors in block letters.
#include<fstream.h>
#include<conio.h>
#include<string.h>
#include<stdio.h>
#include<stdlib.h>
void login();
struct date {
int dd,mm,yy;
[code].....
Can local variable be passed as the parameter for a new created thread procedure? Here is the example code:
Code:
void CDLG::some_function()
{
CString strFileName="abc.doc";
//local variable, can it be valid for being passed into the following new thread???
//Can strFileName still be accessed from within the stack of thread procedure?
::AfxBeginThread(ProcessContentThread,(LPVOID)&strFileName);
}
[Code]...
There is another method using variable on the heap,
Code:
void CDLG::some_function()
{
CString strFileName="abc.doc";
CString* pstrFN=new CString(strFileName);
::AfxBeginThread(ProcessContentThread,(LPVOID)pstrFN);
}
[Code]...
I test these code, both methods work as expected, but I doubt whether the first method is a good way. OR if only the second method is the correct way to pass a parameter to a thread.
I had a flawed function like this:
Code:
fn(){
char c;
if (runFirstTime){
#ifdef VC
c='';
#else
c='/';
#endif
}
... // c is used in the rest of the function to construct some pathnames
}
The problem is that the value of c is not defined the 2nd time the function is called (and subsequently). It somehow worked fine under CygWin compiled with gcc. So I didn't spot the flaw until it ran incorrectly under Windows complied with VC++ 2010. Then I found the error and changed the code to something like
Code:
fn(){
#ifdef VC
const char c='';
#else
const char c='/';
#endif
...
}
So now it works correctly under Windows. Then I re-compiled the new code with gcc and to my surprise gcc produced exactly the same binary! How can this be? Does the gcc compiler see my flaw and fix it for me somehow?
I need to transform a local variable into a global variable so I can use it in one of my functions. I thought about passing the value as a parameter to this function but I can do this since the function is called inside the while loop and this variable counts how many times the while loop does (so the final value is outside the loop). Example to visualize better:
Code:
while(condition) {
function(parameter1, parameter2);
count = count + 1;
}
printf("%d
", count);
So, I need to transform the final value of "count" into a global variable. Can I do this?
Basically, I'm moving a VC project from my Windows 7 build machine to a new build machine that's running Windows 8.1. One of the pre-build steps (for a particular project) runs a script which needs to call the M4 macro processor (which is installed on my C: drive). I've been pretty careful to set everything up the same on both machines (including my PATH) but when I try to build the project on my Windows 8 box, MSVC's IDE shows me this error output when running the script:-
m4 failed with exit code 255
#include<iostream>
#include<stdlib.h>
using namespace std;
int Name(),Minimum(),Maximum();
int main() {
int name=Name(),minimum= Minimum(),maximum= Maximum();
[Code] ...
There are error to let user to key in minimum and maximum values, i would like to know whats the problem?
Should i never return a pointer to a local variable. i have seen the following code in the standard text book.
Code:
struct node *add_to_list(struct node *list, int n)
{
struct node *new_node;
new_node = malloc(sizeof(struct node));
// some code here
return new_node;
}
new_node is a local pointer then why is he returning the new_node? Is it wrong or am i failing to understand something?
Here is my overloaded operator :
const double & Waz::operator()(int i,int j) const {
return ((WazImpl const)(*p))(i,j);
}
Where in Waz class I have : WazImpl* p; and in the class WazImpl I have an operator () const
The warning is : Warning C4172 returning address of local variable or temporary
As far as I understand I'm returning a temp variable which is destroyed somewhere else what can I do to fix it?
I know that this code is wrong because it returns the address of local variable which no longer exist after function:
int *f1()
{
int x = 2;
return &x;
}
However, why this one does not show problem and runs fine, here the pointer p is also a local variable:
int *f2()
{
int x = 2;
int *p;
p = &x;
return p;
}
{
//Declare Variables
decimal hrsWrkd, otPay, grossPay, taxRate=0, taxAmount, netPay,basePay, wage;
string maritalStatus;
const decimal WORKWEEK = 40;
const decimal OTRATE = 1.5m;
const double m = 0.15;
[Code] ....
The error message I am getting is Use of unassigned local variable 'otPay' . I see its been declared and been used in the code so the error is confusing, also when i run the program i noticed that it doesn't take out the taxes.
So I have been working my way through this assignment and I'm just stuck now. I cannot get this work properly It just tells me I'm trying to return a local variable when attempting to return postfix in the to_postfix function. It is line 97 that wont compile. Also I cannot change anything in runner.c.
Calculator.c
Code:
1 #include <stdio.h>
2 #include <stdlib.h>
3 #include <ctype.h>
4 #include <string.h>
5 #include "stack.h"
[Code] .....
I got the following lines of code from a book. The variable char c is being used here to demonstration local variable declaration.
while(char c = cin.get() != 'q') {
cout << c << " wasn't it" << endl;
if(char x = c == 'a' || c == 'b')
cout << "You typed a or b" << endl;
else
cout << "You typed " << x << endl;
}
It compiles and runs. There are two issues when I try to run it.
1) It seems to loop through two times for every entry. If I insert cin.ignore() just before the closing bracket, it seems to work better.
2) the variable c does not seem to have the character I entered when examined in the if statement.
What is happening with the variable c inside the while loop scope?
Does c actually get initialized?
#include <iostream.h>
#include <conio.h>
int main() {
int a;
cout<< "ingrese un numero entre 1 y 4 gracias
";
cin>> a;
switch(a)
[code].....
is it possible to have a global variable pointing to a different address depending on the thread?
Imagine one would like to use threads with the loop:
for (i=0;i<n;i++){
globalPointerVariable=getAddress(i);
DoThingsUsingThe_globalPointerVariable();
}
I am doing a piece of gui code on some embedded system.
I'm trying to find a way of eliminating the local variable kEvent:
Code:
EVENT kEvent;
....
Code:
kEvent = EVENT_UPSTREAM;
xStatus = xQueueSendToBack(getEventProcessorQueue(),&kEvent, 0 );
....
I tried this, it doesn't work:
Code:
xStatus = xQueueSendToBack(getEventProcessorQueue(),(EVENT *)EVENT_UPSTREAM, 0 );
Shouldn't this work?
Here is the code,
Code:
class A {
};
A& CreateObject() {
static A a;
return a;
} static A aa;
int main() {
return 0;
}
So is there any difference between a defined in CreateObject and aa?
When a declare a string e.g.
Code:
char str[30]; as a global variable, the srting is initialized to NULL.
But if I declare char str1[30] INSIDE main(), then the string has garbage inside.... Why this happens??
E.g. the following code snippet...
Code:
#include <stdio.h>
char str[50];
int main(){
char str1[50];
[Code] ....
Code:
#include <iostream.h>
void showMenu();
void showFees (double, int);
void main()
[Code] .....
I am compiling and every time I get this error on this line ....
#include "r3dPCH.h"
#include "r3d.h"
#include "r3dBackgroundTaskDispatcher.h"
#include "d3dfont.h"
#include "GameCommon.h"
#include "Gameplay_Params.h"
#include "UIHUD_TPSGame.h"
#include "ObjectsCode/AI/AI_Player.h"
[Code] .....
I came across the following code today and I was a bit surprised that it worked:-
Code:
std::string func_A () {
static std::string x;
if (!x.empty())
return x;
[Code] ....
I've simplified things slightly - but the basic point is that both functions are in the same source file and they both have a static std::string called 'x'. Being static, I guess they aren't (strictly) local variables. So how does the compiler know that they're different entities? Does it encode their signatures using the function name or something like that? If I call each function separately I do seem to get the correct string...
I have some problems with this code i keep getting the error C2601: local function definitions are illegal.
#include<stdio.h>
#include<stdlib.h>
int col;
int row;
int i;
int count;
char Area[99][99];
[Code] .....
Errorerror C1075: end of file found before the left brace '{' at ...69
Error1error C2601: 'SetField' : local function definitions are illegal17
Error2error C2601: 'KillNieghbors' : local function definitions are illegal31