I need to transform a local variable into a global variable so I can use it in one of my functions. I thought about passing the value as a parameter to this function but I can do this since the function is called inside the while loop and this variable counts how many times the while loop does (so the final value is outside the loop). Example to visualize better:
#include<iostream> #include<stdlib.h> using namespace std; int Name(),Minimum(),Maximum(); int main() { int name=Name(),minimum= Minimum(),maximum= Maximum();
[Code] ...
There are error to let user to key in minimum and maximum values, i would like to know whats the problem?
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; using System.Text; namespace Furniture { class Program { static void Main(string[] args)
[Code] ....
I tried changing the type of variable to char but i still get the same result. i also tried using a switch statement which was my first choice but i had the same issue.
I keep getting the "Uninitialized Local Variable" error. But for my code it's says it's the variable 'pay' in my Manager Function. This is the only error that is popping up.
I've tried setting pay to 0 but when I do, I get a bunch of external errors. I've also tried assigning pay to WeeklySalary like this:
double pay = WeeklySalary;
//Calculating pay for a company
#include <iostream> #include <iomanip> using namespace std;
The error message I am getting is Use of unassigned local variable 'otPay' . I see its been declared and been used in the code so the error is confusing, also when i run the program i noticed that it doesn't take out the taxes.
So I have been working my way through this assignment and I'm just stuck now. I cannot get this work properly It just tells me I'm trying to return a local variable when attempting to return postfix in the to_postfix function. It is line 97 that wont compile. Also I cannot change anything in runner.c.
Can local variable be passed as the parameter for a new created thread procedure? Here is the example code:
Code: void CDLG::some_function() { CString strFileName="abc.doc"; //local variable, can it be valid for being passed into the following new thread??? //Can strFileName still be accessed from within the stack of thread procedure? ::AfxBeginThread(ProcessContentThread,(LPVOID)&strFileName); }
[Code]...
There is another method using variable on the heap,
I test these code, both methods work as expected, but I doubt whether the first method is a good way. OR if only the second method is the correct way to pass a parameter to a thread.
I thought that an operator performs a permanent change in a local variable. For example, if x is 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000011 (a 32 bit unsigned integer that resolves to value of 3) and p is 2, in the expression "return (x >> p) | (x << (s - p))", the right shift would permanently change x to 0 and the time we evaluate x again in "(x << (s - p))", x will already be 0. If that's the case, then this function doesn't make sense. This function makes it seem like that the >> and << operators do not change the value of x. It makes it seem like first we right shift x to 0 and then left shift by 20 bits to make x 11000000 00000000 00000000 00000000. If that's the case, then the function does exactly what it is supposed to do (rotate the bits). So which is it?
unsigned int rightrot(unsigned int x, unsigned int n) { size_t s = sizeof(x) * CHAR_BIT; size_t p; if(n < s) p = n;
I read that Memory is allocated during definition of a variable and not during declaration. Declaration is something like,
Code: int x;
And definition is assigning some value to it. This is what my professor taught. My doubt is if memory is not allocated during declaration, then how the compiler successfully compiles and runs the following, which i had already tried.
Code: #include<stdio.h> #include<conio.h> int main() { int c; int *p=&c; printf("%x",p); getch(); return 0; }
The variable c is only declared. But the program outputs a memory address. Shouldn't it show an error?
If i declare 2 variables like this static int first, second; will both of them be declared static or will only first be declared static and second a regular variable?
#include<iostream> #include<conio.h> #include<string> using namespace std; class ir; class Bank_acc { private: string name,type,s; long int accno,temp,balance,in;
[Code]....
errors are:
|6|error: forward declaration of 'class ir'| |54|error: invalid use of incomplete type 'class ir'| |99|error: no matching function for call to 'ir::interest()'|
Code: #include<stdio.h> extern int v = 0; // Declaration and definition of an external int main(void)
[code]...
Is there any error? Why I take a warning: 'v' initialized and declared 'extern'|||=== Build finished: 0 errors, 1 warnings ===| ???
and what is the meaning of :An extern declaration that initializes a variable serves as a definition of the variable. This rule prevents multiple extern declarations from initializing a variable in different ways.
#include <stdio.h> #include <math.h> main() { int n; int k; int j; //gets user input for length of string printf("Enter the value of n:"); scanf("%d", &n);
[code]......
When I compile my code I get an error saying that I need declaration specifiers in my is_prime subroutine in the for loop.
