I am trying to pass an object to an inherited clas by a constructor. I am having Cboard my board and i need to pass it to the object Cpawn.
Here under is my code:
main
Code:
#include<iostream>#include "Cboard.h"
#include "Cpawn.h"
#include "Cpiece.h"
void main(){
char location[50];
[Code] ....
I have three classes 1 base and two inherited.. problem is when I try to initialize the it says undefined reference to vtable constructor.
Code:
#ifndef QUOTE_H_INCLUDED
#define QUOTE_H_INCLUDED
#include <string>
using namespace std;
[Code] ....
Suppose I have two classes A and B so how to access object of class A in constructor of B's class as a parameter.
View 6 Replies View RelatedThis keeps giving me the error
ecg.h:18:11: error: field "next" has incomplete type
How do I do what I need? It does the same thing whether I use a class or a struct. This is C++ code
struct ECG_node {
double voltage;
clock_t time;
ECG_node next;
[Code] .....
class Base
{
char * ptr;
public:
Base(){}
Base(char * str)
[code].....
Obj1 is a derived class object where base class char pointer is initialized with "singh" and derived class char pointer is initilized with "sunil". I want to create Obj2 out of Obj1. Separate memory should be created for Obj2 char pointer (base part and derived part as well) and that should be initialized with the strings contained in Obj1.
Here the problem is: Derived class part can be initialized with copy constructor. How to initialize the base class char poniter of Obj2 with the base class part of Obj1. char pointers in
both the classes are private.
I tried using initializer list but could not succeed.
Is there some proper way to do this?
will copy constructor does object initialization using another already created object? I understand that it can be applied for object initialization and not for assignment.Is it correct?
View 10 Replies View RelatedSo i am having troubles with operator overloading in inherited class. Basically, it doesnt work. Consider this:
Code:
class A {
public:
A() {
x=0;
z= new int;
[Code] ....
Some how the copy constructor of a is improperly executed - the pointer is copied over, not re-created. As a result, the destructors crashes due to double-free.
*/
B bb = b; //doesnt work
B bbb(b); //doesnt work
B bbbb(b, 0); //works
}
Above code shows the problem well. The "official" copy-constructor wont work - it copies over the pointer directly, and doesnt create a new one as it should. However, if i provide my own pseudo-copy-constructor that works. But ofcourse it's just a cheap work around - and wont actually work in real code (STL).
compiler is VS2008SP1.
I am trying to use web api in order to return custom json response keys. For this i have return a custom class to return json response
Custom Class:
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Globalization;
using System.Linq;
[Code].....
I have the following problem on my C++ Program and I am not sure why it is not working. I am creating a infix to postfix program through an inherited class which I am not sure it is working.
#include <iostream>
#include <stack>
using namespace std;
int in_stack_Priority(char a){
if(a == '*' || a == '/')
return 2;
[Code] .....
how to create a base class that is derived (inherited) by three other classes?
View 12 Replies View RelatedIs this example correct? This example from a book
Constructor of the Base Class
Person::Person(char* n="", char* nat="U.S.A", int s=1)
{
name = n;
nationality = nat;
sex = s;
}
Constructor of the Derived Class (inherited from the base class)
Student(char* n, int s=0, char* i=""):
Person(n, s)
Why the initialized list of the base class constructor doesn't match the initialized list of the derived class constructor? I know this book is a little bit old, I'm not sure if this wrong in VC++ 2010?
I have `MainShop`(base class) then `SwordShop` and `BowShop`(derived classes) and another derived class called `Inventory`. I have a vector under protected in my base class, and when I access it from my derived classes it's okay, but each one has its own value. How can I set them all to have the same value?
//MainShop.h
#pragma once
class MainShop {
private:
//some variables
protected:
vector <string> WeaponInventory;
[code]......
Here every time I run it, it goes straight to the `else` and it displays that I do not have any items. I want to just have one vector for both my bow and Sword shops because vectors take up a lot of memory and my teacher said keep them to a minimum. So I just want one vector that takes in items from my bow class as well as my sword class, but for some reason it's acting as if I have multiple vectors, each with its own set of items.
I need to create a GlobalConfig class. But I want to derive from it in another class.
Here's an example:
public class BaseConfig {
public string GlobalPath {get; set;}
}
public class ConfigA : BaseConfig {
public string pathA {get; set;}
}
public class ConfigB : ConfigA {
public string pathB {get; set;}
}
The idea behind is that I don't want to write the code multiple times and what's more important in class ConfigA I want to set GlobalPath and have access to it in ConfigB.
In other word I want class ConfigB to have a property GlobalPath which was set in class ConfigA.
To clarify I want to have only one object of Config in memory.
When I set BaseConf.GlobalPath to 'A', I want to access it from ConfigB.GlobalPath and also get 'A'.
I always design GlobalConfig as a static class, but static classes can't be inherited. So I tried to implement Singleton Pattern, but ConfigA can't find constructor of class BaseConfig because it's private.
is it possible to get object name in the constructor? I would like to initialize an object of circle class without any arguments and put some pretty lines in constructor to get and save as table of chars the name of creating object. Is it possible? I work with MSVS2012.
View 4 Replies View Relatedto initialize this object? Why C++ FAQ says no? Here is my code,
Code:
class A
{
public:
A(int x, char c);
A(int x);
[code] ....
I don't have any trouble to call the constructor A(int x, char c) from another constructor A(int x).
sth is in my mind.
fast way of initializing an object through constructor is
Fred::Fred() : x_(whatever) { }
slow way
Fred::Fred() { x_ = whatever; }
ok. i accept it is faster but why?? what is the difference compiler does.
I have a question about the default constructor.
To my best understanding, the compiler will provide me with a deafult constructor only if there are no any user defined constructors, at all. Now consider the following code:
Code: class MyClass
{
private:
int m_data;
public:
MyClass(int init):m_data(init){cout<<"Ctr called"<<endl;}
[Code] ....
How is it that suddenly, there is a default constructor?
The case is like
class B{
public:
somedata;
somefunction();
}
class A{
public:
data;
function();
}
in somefunction i want a pointer to current object of class A m new to c++
I have a program that has a base class 'control' and there are 2 dervied classes 'button' and 'textbox'. How do i make a constructor in the 'button' or 'textbox' that initializes a pointer of the data type 'control' to point to the object that invokes the constructor. the code should look like this
class control {
//data
} class button:public control {
buton() {
//code for the constructor
}
}
actually i have an array of pointers of the type 'control' and as soon as any instance of a control like button or textbox is created the constructor should make an element of the array to point to the instance
I am creating a Matrix class, and one of the constructors parses a string into a matrix. However, printing the result of the constructor (this->Print()) prints what I expect, and an <object_just_created>.Print() call returns bogus data. How is this even possible?
Snippets below:
Matrix::Matrix(const string &str) {
// Parse a new matrix from the given string
Matrix r = Matrix::Parse(str);
nRows= r.nRows;
nCols= r.nCols;
[Code] ....
in the driver program, here are the two successive calls
Matrix mm6("[1 2 3.8 4 5; 6 7 8 9 10; 20.4 68.2 1341.2 -15135 -80.9999]");
mm6.Print();
// mm6.Print() calls bogus data, -2.65698e+303 at each location. The matrix's
// underlying array is valid, because printing the addresses yields a block
// of memory 8 bits apart for each location
I'm trying to pass an reference of the object ifstream to my constructor as such:
// myClass.cpp
int main(){
ifstream file;
myClass classobj = myClass(file);}
I am defining the constructor as follows, in myClass.cpp:
myClass::myClass(ifstream &file){
// do stuff
}
I get the error of "No overloaded function of myClass::myClass matches the specified type."
Also, when I build the program, it tells me "syntax error: identifier 'ifstream'"
Also, I made sure I included this:
#include <iostream>
#include <fstream>
#include <sstream>
What am I doing wrong? How can I pass an ifstream reference to my constructor?
Write a constructor that initializes a new inventory object with the values passed as arguments, but which also includes a reasonable default value for each parameter.
#include "stdafx.h"
#include <iostream.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
class inventory {
[Code] ....
I am not trying to get my homewotk done, just to understand my errors. It complies without problem. But doesn't run.
Let's say I have a Car object , and it contains inner Engine object.
Code:
struct Car{
Engine mEngine;
};
In order to initialize the engine object NOT by the default constructor (if it has any) , we use initialization semantics:
Code:
Car::Car:
mEngin(arg1,arg2,...)
{
other stuff here
}
Now it gets tricky: Let's say a Car objects has 10 inner objects, each object has about 5 variables in it . Car is a base class for , e.g. , Toyota class. you don't want the Car class to have a constructor with 50 arguments. Can the inner objects of Car be initialized from the base class , e.g. Toyota?
Code:
class Toyota:
Car(...),
mEngine(...),
mGear(..)
{
...
};
The other options are:
1) like said , create a Car constructor which gets 50 arguments, then initialize Car as whole from Toyota - the code becomes less readable and less intuitive
2) Car constructor which get built-objects as arguments and initialize the inner objects with copy constructor . the code gets more readable but then you create many excess objects .
#include "B.h"
class A {
public :
A()
{
s_b = new B();
b = new B();
[Code] ....
In my project i have seen static object as above . But not able to know what is the exact use of it and how they are different from general object .
I understand it is done like this
// Calling the base class constructor
explicit CCandyBox(double lv, double wv, double hv, const char* str="Candy"): CBox(lv, wv, hv)
{
...
}
But how does the compiler know that you are initializing the base "part" of the object?
Or is this the entire reason initialization lists exist, to separate this confusion?
I am trying to use constructor within constructor in the same class. Is that possible. I have tried something and it shows me a error message:
error: type "mainClass" is not a direct base of "glavna"
This is the program I tried:
Code:
class mainClass {
private:
int x,y;
Code] ......
