Is there a way in either Visual Studio 2010 or g++ (any version) to see what classes it instantiates and their code? For example to see if i avoid code bloat when i explicitly instantiate a template for certain types.
View 3 RepliesIs there a way to use preprocessing to conditionally return different types in a template. More specifically, is there a way to use preprocessing to block out conditional parts of code for one type verse another?
Example of what I can't get to compile for anything but POD types:
template <class T>returnTypeMatching(string inputName,string typeName) {
if(typeName="string") {
cerr<<"string types matched so returning string '"<< inputName <<"'"<<endl;
return inputName;
[Code] .....
If I switch string to long, the implied conversions let it work. I'm imagining there might be some preprocessing way to hide irrelevant conditions. I mean, this code would cause an error to return a string when T=double, so I get why there is a compiler error. However, is there a way to make that part of the code get hidden in that case when the template is processed when T=double?
I was creating a template and I realized that certain data-types/structs/classes would not be applicable to my template.This would cause bugs and errors if used incorrectly. Is there a way to restrict a template-capture to certain types/classes?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI want to write a template that combines two type of resources:
class someClasses {
typedef someType ElementType;
} template<class T1,class T2>
class combo {
...
}
And I want to specify my T1 and T2 has the same ElementType, how can I write my combo class to partial specialize the general case so the ElementType check is at compile time?
two more questions
Code:
#ifndef PERFECTSIM_PARSER
#define PERFECTSIM_PARSER
#include <string>
#include <d3dx9.h>
#include <sstream>
#include <iostream>
#include "tinyxml inyxml.h"
using namespace std;
template<class T>
class GetValue {
protected:
virtual T get(TiXmlNode* pParent);
[code].....
1) Can't instantiate abstract class of GetVector3.
2) Don't you think the coding is very redundant ?
I have this
Code:
#include<stdio.h>
#include<ctype.h>
#include<string.h>
int check_up(char string[]);
int check_low(char string[]);
void to_up(char string[]);
void to_low(char string[]);
[Code] .....
When I compile this I have the following problems: warning: data definition has no type or storage class [enabled by default] in 'to_up(word)'conflicting types in 'to_up' function and to_low function warning: data definition has no type or storage class [enabled by default] into_up function error: unknown type name "word" in line 'printf("All uppercase %s. ", word):;'warning: parameter names (without types) in function declaration [enabled by default] in 'to_up(word)'and 'to_low(word)' 'note: previous declaration of "to_up" was here in function declaration of to_up function
I'm trying to implement a simple template array class, but when i came into the operator< i actually have to use a template :
my code is something like :
template<typename _Type, std::size_t _Size>
class array {
public :
[Code] ......
but i am having an error of shadows template param 'class _Type' is it w/ the name conflict between the array template parameter and the function template parameter ?
Error1error C2955: 'DoubleLinkedListInterface' : use of class template requires template argument listdoublelinkedlist.h10
Error2error C2244: 'DoubleLinkedList<T>::DoubleLinkedList' : unable to match function definition to an existing declaration doublelinkedlist.cpp7
Error3 .cpperror C2244: 'DoubleLinkedList<T>::~DoubleLinkedList' : unable to match function definition to an existing declaration 12
.h
#pragma once
#include "DoubleLinkedListInterface.h"
#include "Node.h"
#include <iostream>
[Code]....
I have a generic template class with another template in one of its types. Now I want to specialize one of its methods for a particular (template) class, which leads to a compile error, however.
Here is the example:
#include <stdio.h>
template<typename Type>
class Obj1 {
public:
void ID() { printf("Object 1, size = %zu
[Code] .....
GCC ends with:
:35:27: error: type/value mismatch at argument 2 in template parameter list for ‘template<class Type, template<class> class O> class Foo’
:35:27: error: expected a class template, got ‘Obj2<Type>’
What is wrong with the specialization? Can it even be achieved and how (if so)?
how I want the code to look. Only problem is it doesn't work (Line 11). I have some experience with templates but I'm not a pro.
Basically I want the "Channels<3>" to be a type that I can use to specify a Cable with similar to vector<float/int> it would be Cable<Channels<2 or 3>>.
What have I messed up with the syntax?
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
using namespace std;
[Code].....
I have a function:
template<class Iterator, class T>
void a(Iterator, Iterator, const T&);
and I want to be able to simplify calls to 'a' with calls like
a(someIteratableContainer);
instead of having to call:
a(someIteratableContainer.begin(), someIteratableContainer.end(), valueOfTheContainersElementType);
I also want to be able to generalize the function to handle any of the standard iteratable contains: array, vector, deque, whatever.
I was under the impression I could write:
template<template<class T> class U> a(U<T>& container) {
a(container.begin(), container.end(), g(T()));
}
where 'g()' returns an object of the element type. However, the compiler is claiming, no matter how I write a call to the overload, the original template is selected and/or the overload is invalid, depending on the various ways I attempt to write said overload.
[URL]
#include <iostream>
struct Outer {
template<typename T>
void go() {
std::cout << Test<T>::f() << std::endl;
[Code] .....
I have tried several variants on this code to no avail. Outer is in a header, along with the extern template statements, and the specializations after main are in their own cpp file. Main is in a different cpp file.
What do have to do to make this work? I cannot bring the definitions of f() into the header, and they will be different for different template parameters. Ideally, I want Test to remain a private member of Outer, though this can change if it's the only option.
I have been trying to get a hang on templates. I have the two following functions that that could be consolidated in a single template function:
void Attractor::updateFamilies(FamiliesController *_tmp, int _counter){
center.x = ofGetWidth()/2;
center.y = ofGetHeight()/3;
attractorCounter = _counter;
if(attractorCounter == 1){
[Code] .....
NotesController and FamiliesController have the same parent. The thing that I'm trying to grasp with templates is that is could something like:
template<class TYPE>
void Attractor::updateData(TYPE* *_tmp, int _counter){
center.x = ofGetWidth()/2;
center.y = ofGetHeight()/3;
attractorCounter = _counter;
[Code] ....
And then have another template function declaration for all the attractor functions where I pass the same template value as in the first one.
As you can see, I'm calling another functions inside called attractors(_tmp). I know that one way around it could be to get rid of that function and just do all the logic inside of each if statement. Is there any way to pass the same template function parameter within a template function parameter?
I have a class like this
PHP Code:
template<class X>
class A {
X m_x;
public:
X* foo();
X* bar();
//others are not related to X
};
I would like to get rid of
PHP Code: template<class X>
For class level but still use it for members. Like this
PHP Code:
class A {
X m_x;
public:
template<class X>
X* foo();
template<class X>
X* bar();
//others are not related to X
};
However, I am still stuck at
PHP Code: X m_x;
Let me put it into the code snippet:
/**
This class build the singleton design pattern.
Here you have full control over construction and deconstruction of the object.
*/
template<class T>
class Singleton
[Code]....
I am getting error at the assertion points when i call to the class as follows:
osgOpenCL::Context *cxt = osgOpenCL::Singleton<osgOpenCL::Context>::getPtr();
I tried commenting assertion statements and then the debugger just exits at the point where getPtr() is called.
Given:
#include <string>
template <class T>
class basic_container{
[Code] .....
is this possible:
#include "../basic_container/basic_container.hpp"
template <class T>
class container_vector{
[Code] .....
If not, what do I need to do to achieve my goal?
int* count;
count = new int(1); // what???
Is this on the heap?? do i have to delete it now?
So is 'new' on a primitive data type just a way for me to allocate primitive data types (int, char, etc.) on the heap instead of the stack?
And, out of curiosity, can you do that in Java?
How to convert these data types? i have an array of bytes in unsigned char[] array, and need to convert to const void* pointer.
View 3 Replies View Related#include <iostream>
#include <cmath>
#include <iomanip>
using namespace std;
int main() {
double temp, result;
char type;
[Code] .....
How do you create an object (like in the title) something more simple than a struct? I wanna know that cuz I'm writing a function that could return a boolean and an integer at the same time.
View 2 Replies View Relateddouble a = 1.0 + 1 + 1.0f; //everynumber will be added up as a double even the last one which is a float. All 3 numbers will turn into 3.0 as a double.
int x = (int)(7 + 3.0 / 4.0 * 2); //the variable will do the math bracket first. then the va type will still be an int because int was never changed.
Console.WriteLine((1 + 1) / 2 * 3); // 1 + 1 will be done first then 1 / 2 then * by 3
Console.WriteLine(x);
Console.ReadKey();
I THINK THATS ALL WRONG ^ =/ like the comments
double a = 1.0 + 1 + 1.0f;
In this equation, everything is using addition, so we start working left to right. 1.0 + 1 is the first step. These two representations of 1 aren't the same type though. In fact, none of the three are.
The first is a double, the second is an int, and the last is a float.
So in order to do 1.0 + 1, we need to convert one type to another. Since the double type is "wider" than the int type, we'll move things up to the double type. We'll convert the int version to a double, and to 1 + 1 using double types, resulting in 2.0 as a double.
Next we do the other addition. This has the same problem, though, because we'll be adding our result from the first step (a 2 as a double) to a float. So again, the float gets converted up to a double and we do the addition using doubles.
We now have a value of 3 that is the double type, which we can simply store in our a variable without any conversions at all, since our value is already a double type.
This is some code that simulates files and directories the same way an operating system does so. I commented out every std::string occurrence because I got the :
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::length_error'
what(): basic_string::_S_create
I've got a game engine with a line-trace collision method which returns the first object it hits. I'd like to be able to pass it a class-type so that it can ignore objects of other types.
consider this pseudo-code:
Entity* TraceEntity( const Vec3f& LineStart, const Vec3f& LineEnd, const Type atype ) {
// check collision on entities, ignore entities of type 'atype'.
// return whatever it finds
}
I'd like to do this without template classes because it will result in a significant bloat in executable size every time I decided to trace for a new entity type (I've really developed a distaste for templates for this reason)
using type_info only checks for an object's deepest subclass, so it won't work for class C : public B : public A if I'm looking for classes of type B.
he was asking various types of implementing interfaces in csharp,
View 1 Replies View RelatedWhat are the possible problems if I declare a bunch of data types and never use them? Do they take up a lot of memory? Will they slow run time? If it is an array do I have to delete it at the end of the program? What if the array is defined inside a class and never used? Do I still have to delete it?
i.e.
Code: class declarearrays{
public:
double **darray;
double **darray2;
void function1();//function that initializes darray
void function2();//function that initializes darray2 with different parameters, may not be used.
};
I am working on a double linked list and inside of my function to insert a node, I am getting an error of "Incompatible types in assignment". Here is my function code. Line 55 is where I am receiving the error.
Code:
45 struct lnode *ins_llist(char data[], struct llist *ll){
46 struct lnode *p, *q;
47
48 q = malloc(sizeof(struct lnode));
49 if ( q == NULL )
[Code]....