So I'm trying to accomplish something that right seems to hard for it to be worth it. I'm trying to write a plugin framework/system for my game. I have read about it and everything that pops up says it's OS-specific and you have to load the plugins from either a .so file on linux or from a .dll file on Windows. So here lie my questions:
-Is there any universal way of accomplishing this?
-Every way I've seen assumes i know the names of the functions I'm calling which doesn't hold true if the plugin are written by a 3rd party. How would i turn the table on this matter?
I'm making a game with the following class structure:
GameControl - The class that actually runs the game, with a while(!closed) // run the game loop.
State - A class that handles the state of the game, for example if the game is rendering the scene it would be in one state, and if it is rendering the menu, it would be in another.
ComponentManager - A class that manages all of the components of what is being done, for instance, the Scene class would contain a bunch of components handling the drawing of each tree, physics, the camera, etc. The manager will put them all together.
Component - A component of whatever is being done. A tree (and its rendering code) would be an example of a component of the scene. The camera would be another. The component does not necessarily have to be drawn, it could be handling something like physics (and would throw physics events to other components that need to move in a certain way).
The GameControl class has its loop, which would call the update function on the current State (there are classes that inherit State and override the update function of State).
In the update function of the base class "State", it would take all of the active ComponentManagers and update them. There are classes that inherit the base class ComponentManager and override its update function.
Each ComponentManager would update each of the Components that it owns.
This is the organizational structure that I came up with to make the game scalable and changeable . If, for instance, I wanted to add multiplayer at some point, I would add a class that inherits the State that controls the gameplay called "MultiplayerGameState". This would just add a new ComponentManager that inherits the ComponentManager that controls the player and all of the living things that are moving around. Then, the MultiplayerGameState class would recieve the multiplayer messages coming in and add other player Components for the other players.
My code is giving me various errors like "Forward definition of class State" and "Invalid use of incomplete type State". Unless I made some stupid error that I didn't catch, these are being caused by me including the classes in ways that some of the classes do not see the full definitions of the classes they need to see (because of the preprocessor directives preventing classes from being included multiple times.
Code: (Not implemented exactly as shown above, but I think the main difference is that the main class is not in GameControl, it's in OgreFramework.cpp)
The base classes: [URL] ... States: [URL] ... ComponentManagers: [URL] ... Components: [URL] ... The project: [URL] ...
My question is: is there a better way to implement my organizational system so that these errors don't occur?
I'm working on a game with an entity-component system. I have a Manager class that is handling all of the components by feeding them into vectors set up for each type of component. Right now I have a lot of repeated code for each kind of component.
I've tried generalizing this with templates, but I've been confused by how I should organize the collection of vectors for each component. I had it setup so that they were all in an unordered_map, but how to get the templated functions to find the right map slot to use based simply on the template's parameters.
The full project is here for reference: [URL] ....
I have to write a program that simulates a handheld gaming system. a system can have power toggled so its either on or off. when the system is on, its volume level can be raised or lowerd. a system has minimum volume level of zero and a maximum volume level of 10. a system stores games.
// simple game menu //simulates a handheld gaming system using namespace std; class Game { public: Game(int GameNumber = 3, int volume = 10);
I'm looking at writing my own plug-in app, but I know that deleting class instances that were created in a plug-in module can result in the dreaded "undefined behaviour" because of the different memory spaces. Many examples of plug-ins use create_class and destroy_class functions to resolve this problem, but I wondered about overriding / overloading the class's new and delete operators. This would be used for all third-party library class derivations (e.g. derived GUI classes) and all home-grown classes.
The operators would only be declared in the class declaration:
class PluginBase { public: void *operator new(std::size_t n); void operator delete(void *p); // Other plugin bits
While the actual implementation would be defined in the plug-in's implementation file:
This would need to be implemented in every transferable plug-in class (possibly by a crafty IMPLEMENT_PLUGIN(classname) macro or some other mechanism), but before I commit this to my code I was hoping for feedback. Does this sound like a good idea? The GUI classes in particular are handled by a third-party library, so it's some memory-space safe way of deleting them by the GUI library (in the app) that I'm looking for.
I have a VC++ project to create a DLL that will be used as a Plug-in in an external programm. This DLL uses some MFC functions. The initial configuration of the project was:
-Use of MFC: Use MFC in a Static Library
-Common Language Runtime support: No Common Language Runtime support
-Runtime Library: Multi-threaded Debug (/MTd)
This configuration worked fine, there were no compilation errors and the resulting DLL worked correctly.
The problem came when it was necessary to add to the DLL some functions of .NET, using the namespace System and similar. To do that, I had to change the Common Language Runtime support, to Common Language Runtime Support (/clr). Then, when I tried to compile, I got this message:
'/MTd' and '/clr' command-line options are incompatible
So I changed the Runtime Library to Multi-threaded Debug DLL (/MDd). Then I got this error message:
Building MFC application with /MD[d] (CRT dll version) requires MFC shared dll version
So I also changed the Use of MFC to Use MFC in a Shared DLL.
After this, the compilation was correct. Then logically the size of the generated DLL is smaller, but this new DLL does not work correctly, the external program in which this DLL is used crashes.
I don't know what to do to fix the problem. Maybe I need to add some other DLLs or files to the directory where the DLL is located, where the external program uses it. But I would prefer to include a single DLL file, but this seems to be incompatible with the use of .NET functionality.
I'm new to C programming and I need to write a "small" expandable menu framework and I don't know where to start off.
This is my task: Create an expandable menu framework in C where you can add a infinite number of entries and Sub menus containing other Menu points or where the entries refer to a external function. So far I've created the structures I need
Code: //Menu structure struct menu { char mtitel[MAX]; struct mpoint point; struct menu *next, *prev;
To the topic: I've been following "SDL game development" book by Shaun Mitchell and (besides the many others in the past) I've encountered a problem in one of the chapters.
I'm in "creating and displaying tile maps". The chapter uses tintxml to load data outside the code, which is used to create a "map screen".
The problem is that the program work perfect except for not loading and/or rendering this "screen".
I know this is too vague of an explanation, but I wouldn't know what else to say.
I'm leaving the link to the repository with all the code: [URL]...
I am trying to load a .bmp file located in the same folder as main.cpp etc. but I'm not sure what to input as the resource path so that it picks it up and, when I distribute it, I want it to be preferably cross platform and run smoothly.
I have tried using:
hello_world.bmp SDL_Game/hello_world.bmp (SDL_Game is the name of the project)
but it will work if I use the full path. I don't want to do this though, because then it will not work on other computers and platforms.
I need to show in a comboBox thats shows infor from Entity framework but i need to select a specific colum in the tables..
All in C# visual studio xaml form
So I created a var but i get and output: name of programe.NLHEntities
using (var context = new NLHEntities()) { var blog = context.EtagesChambres .Where(b => b.TypeChanbre == "Prive") .FirstOrDefault(); textBox2Type.Text = Convert.ToString(blog);// i put a text box to see what the output would be.. }
i have created application using gembox i create a word file and save data on it but i want after saving it itis opened to me using microsoft word directly
it is the code
DocumentModel document1 = new DocumentModel(); Section section1 = new Section(document1); document1.Sections.Add(section1);
I developed a sample application in EF which has 3 tables
PersonDetails, BankDetails and FixedDepositDetails.
Please find the table structure below
create table PersonDetails (PersonId int Primary Key, PersonName varchar(30)) create table BankDetails (BankId int Primary Key, BankName varchar(100),
[Code] ....
But when I run the application I get an error as
The navigation property 'Bank_Id' is not a declared property on type 'FixedDepositDetails'. Verify that it has not been explicitly excluded from the model and that it is a valid navigation property.
If I am not wrong I think I have made some mistakes when creating the model.
Yes, exactly, and I have been successfully creating EF Model before from the same database.... Why is it acting up now... I did check SO and they seems not to have a solution for it also....
I'm working on my first video game. So far I have a few classes in the game starting with the Game class which includes a list of GameObjects (another class). There are several classes that inherit from GameObjects used to implement things like bullets, explosions, various enemy types, etc.
The game essentially iterates through the list of GameObjects to update/render them. I would like to provide access to the Game's list of GameObjects inside another class (like the Bullet class) so I can put new objects on the list. For example, when a bullet hits, I want to add an explosion to the Game's GameObject list it can be updated/rendered.
How this should be setup? I was considering adding a pointer to the Game or GameObject list to the GameObject class (and methods to access it), but I was wondering if there is a better way to set this up?
I would like to make a program for calculating the total price of a game station, and a game. I made a program like this for just the price of a game in class, but I want to make one that does the game system as well.
I just started my task with Ordering system. what should I use if I'm going to ask the user if he wants to exit the system, he will press(zero)0 to exit the program and press Y(uppercase or lowercase) to continue?
Here's the objective of the program: "Instead of using ABCDEFGHIJ to order letters use DCBAJIHGF go order. The program should determine which 4-letter word is larger of two based on this new ordering system."
Not even sure how to start with this problem , how would I go about defining my own ordering system?
