I'm getting a stack overflow error because for large numbers, this code I'm working on allocates too much on the stack.
Is there a way of tracking stack allocations specifically?
Will multithreading solve my problem if each thread is doing the static allocations?
Would I really have to use malloc or new every time I wanted to use memory just to make my code scale to huge numbers?
I usually check if a bit is set using:
Code: bit = (number >> n) & 1; where `n` is the bit I want to check...
But I came across a stackoverflow answer saying:
bit = number & (1 << x); will not put the value of bit x into bit unless bit has type _Bool (<stdbool.h>).
Otherwise, bit = !!(number & (1 << x)); will..
So why is this? why the double !?
Here is my error message: Warning1warning C4717: 'getx' : recursive on all control paths, function will cause runtime stack overflow
and here is my code I will Bold the part that is giving me problems!
class point
{
public:
point();
[Code]....
After not programming for sometimes I decided to program a small application. But I have some trouble according to what I remember and re-checking arrays online. I don't understand how the code I wrote below is possible, shouldn't give a stack overflow error or something to that extent? Instead it gives me the value of 3.
#include "stdafx.h"
#include<iostream>
int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[]) {
int arr2 [2];
arr2 [3] = 3;
[Code] ....
I'm pretty new to C, and keep getting an error. Basically I'm trying to convert a ppm image to all red. Here is my code that I can't get to work:
Code:
change(pixel_t *PIXEL, &w, &h,pixel_t *buffer);
And here is the beginning of my convert function:
Code:
void change(pixel_t *pixel, int w, int h, pixel_t *buffer) {
int average, sum;
int i;
pixel_t *pointer;
Everything else works fine. I keep getting an error when I call the convert function. It says "expected expression before pixel_t" and "too few arguments to function "change". I know that everything else in the main is working.
I am trying to implement the insert function of a binary tree. Atm when I try and insert 3 nodes, the program breaks and gives me a stack overflow error. The error points to a getter function for an identifier for the data in my node class.
void LinkedList::add(Product *myProduct) {
if (_length==0) {
_head = new Node(NULL, NULL, myProduct);
_end = _head;
_length=1;
[Code] ....
Here is my insert function, the error message is
"An unhandled exception of type 'System.NullReferenceException' occurred in SDI2.exe
Additional information: Object reference not set to an instance of an object. "
In my main I have declared an instance of product, "productToAdd = new Product(id,idPrice);" so I'm a bit confused as to what I need to include..
int main (int argc, char **argv) {
//int i,m;
double v1[kmax],v2[kmax],Ng,Lk[kmax],Hmax,Lmk[N],FD;
//double Lk1 = 0.0;
double x1[N];
loadImage("../sierpinski10.pgm");
printf("Bnorm[40][2] = %f",Bnorm[40][2]); //test
[code]...
Note:I am receiving error "Run-Time Check Failure #2 - Stack around the variable 'Lmk' was corrupted."
I was just wondering how to deal with overflow. My code works for exponential when i put small numbers in like 2 and 3. So it would do 2^3 which would be 8. But if i try something like 2^44 then I just get 0.
View 2 Replies View RelatedCode:
char buffer1[10];
char buffer2[10] = "something";
sprintf(buffer1, "with %s", buffer2);
In a statement like the one above, is there a threat/leak or does it only truncate the string that is loaded into buffer1?
Small code to show overflow...But when I compile and run - buffer_one is not being overwritten when the byte size of buffer_two overflows .
Code:
#include <stdio.h>#include <string.h>
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
int value = 5;
char buffer_one[8], buffer_two[8];
strcpy(buffer_two, "two"); //Put "one" into buffer_one
strcpy(buffer_one, "one"); //Put "two" into buffer_two
}
[code]....
I am performing arithmetic operations on very large integers that operate around the threshold of the maximum positive integer an int variable can handle (i.e. 2147483647) for a 32-bit machine. I have been studying the in-built functions in the C++ Standard Library for some time now where I came across some error detecting functions in the <cmath> and <cerrno> header files. The impression I got from the literature is that they are solely used in conjunction with functions contained in the <cmath> header file and not necessarily with fundamental arithmetic operations like addition and subtraction.
I need a means to know when my arithmetic operations generate overflows/underflows! Is there any way I can adapt the functionalities of these functions to my needs?
preventing a buffer overflow when dealing with strings being passed as arguments.
If I have a function prototype such as:
Code:
void foobar(char *bar);
That argument bar - is intended to take a pointer to a buffer of x characters in length. Inside that function, I can't get the size of that buffer, as bar is now just a pointer to a char. I COULD just make the user of this function pass a length parameter, but there is no guarantee that would be correct. Is there a bullet proof way of detecting that the user has provided a buffer that is too small?
Why I have a
HTML Code:
FLOATING POINT ERROR: OVERFLOW
ABNORMAL PROGRAM TERMINATION
in the code below?
Code:
#include<stdio.h>
#include <math.h>
#include<conio.h>
#define A 0
#define B 1
float F(float x0, float y0) {
return (0.2*x0)+(y0*y0);
[Code] .....
What is wrong with this code? I keep getting
HTML Code:
FLOATING POINT ERROR: OVERFLOW
ABNORMAL PROGRAM TERMINATION
Code:
#include<stdio.h>
#include<math.h>
#include<conio.h>
#include<iostream.h>
#define N 4
float x[5]={0, 1, 2, 3, 4};
float y[5]={0.5, 2, 7.5, 20, 42.5};
[Code] ....
Can you declare a stack globally?
Code:
stack< int > stk;
I am getting corrupted stack variable for this piece of bolded code. (starCounter is corrupted)...
Code:
int i;
int j;
int s;
double starCounter[18]= {0};
double lowestfreq = 0;
double frequencyChecker [18] = {0};
[Code] .....
I am curious as to what is happening to my pointers and everything once I call malloc to create space for 5 integers to try to make a stack.
Code:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
void add(int * TOP, int * stack);
int main() {
int *stack = NULL;
int *TOP = NULL;
stack = (int *)malloc (5 * sizeof(int));
[Code] ....
I am guessing that when I initialize stack to malloc, stack now stores the starting address of where the space is taken out, and also assigns TOP that address too. I get the choice from the user (b) to get the instruction to try to push on the stack. I was told that the if statement in the function checks if the stack has passed the bounds of 5 elements. If not, it assigns the scanned variable and puts it into what TOP is pointing to and increments TOP to the next address. It is not working and am wanting to see where my logic is wrong.
Code:
#include <stdio.h>#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#define STACKSIZE 100
struct stackk
{
int top;
int items[STACKSIZE];
};
typedef struct stackk *s;
[Code]...
write an algorithm using stack to determine if an input of string is in the form xCy where y is the reverse of x.x and y are strings of A and B. eg : AABACABAA
View 8 Replies View RelatedValidation opening/closing brackets.
I had the entire validation working until my professor said that my Pop function had to be a "void" not a "Char". Which destroyed my previous validation and now how to validate this.
I will only be posting the validating function.
All the characters are being thrown in a Stack. So I am using Pop/Top/Push/isEmpty/isFull. That will be shown in my validating code.
Correct Validations:
1. {}()[]
2. [()]
3. {([])}
Incorrect Validations:
1.[)
2.[(]]
3.{])
My main issue is that it validates "[)" correct.
I am pretty positive I must have over complicated my validation.
I keep getting the error "Stack around the variable 'odd' was corrupted." how can I fix this here is the program:
#include <iostream>
#include <iomanip>
#include <fstream>
#include <string>
using namespace std;
ifstream infile; ofstream outfile;
[Code] ....
I am trying to implement a stack class which has struct data type as its private member. I am getiing the following error ,
bash-3.2$ g++ stack_str_arr.cpp
stack_str_arr.cpp: In member function ‘void stack::push(int)’:
stack_str_arr.cpp:39: error: ‘top’ was not declared in this scope
stack_str_arr.cpp: At global scope:
stack_str_arr.cpp:43: error: no ‘void stack::display()’ member function declared in class ‘stack’
Code:
#include<iostream>
using namespace std;
#define MAX 5
class stack {
public :
stack();
[Code] ....
In c89/90 is there a way to retrieve a pointer from stack or whatever that would behave as this would once cast to the correct type? This is more of a curiosity than a requirement.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI am unable to make any logical algorithm to access middle of stack. I am using stack implemented with linkedlists, I have following functions available for stack like push,pop,top.
View 6 Replies View RelatedSuppose if i code like this,
while( true ) {
int x;
// do some thing;
// break on some condition match;
}
whether memory is allocated for ints x one time or each time it hits int x.
I'm following a course with coursera (algorithm 1) and my program for the assignment crashes inexorably (many are experimenting the same thing there, the assignment asks for a recursive program for solving a big graph of 500000 nodes). I'm using a version of g++ from MinGW with the editor Geany and windows7. The current setup is:
g++ -std=c++11 -Wall -c "%f"
g++ -std=c++11 -Wall -o "%e" "%f"
How can I set the stack 'unlimited'?