Right now I have code
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
class Rectangle {
private:
double width;
double length;
[Code] .....
it gives error ...
I am attempting to implement function pointers and I am having a bit of a problem.
See the code example below; what I want to be able to do is call a function pointer from another pointer.
I'll admit that I may not be explaining this 100% correct but I am trying to implement the code inside the main function below.
class MainObject;
class SecondaryObject;
class SecondaryObject {
public:
[Code]....
If I have an array of some class, and that class has const members, is there some way I can call a custom constructor on elements of the array?
I can't seem to reinitialize an element in foos in the example below. A thread on stack overflow mentioned the copy constructor show allow it, but I get "no match for call to '(Foo) (Foo&)'" when I try it.
Code:
class Foo {
public:
Foo();
Foo(int x, int y);
[Code] .....
I'm trying to call a function via a function pointer, and this function pointer is inside a structure. The structure is being referenced via a structure pointer.
Code:
position = hash->(*funcHash)(idNmbr);
The function will return an int, which is what position is a type of. When I compile this code,
I get the error: error: expected identifier before ( token.
Is my syntax wrong? I'm not sure what would be throwing this error.
I have this code:
#include "stdafx.h"
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
void square_cube(float *x,float *y) {
[Code] .....
The function should pass the square of the first input parameter and the cube of the second input parameter back to the calling routine. I thought I could use a recursion but its not going to work.
I have the following piece of code.
Code:
#include<iostream>
using namespace std;
class Test {
public:
Test(){cout<<"Test"<<endl;}
void fun() {
int i=5;
[Code] ...
Compiled with g++.
Executing this give output fun5.
It is correct? I have not allocated any object and so this pointer is not created. Then how it is able to run and call the function.
Say I have 3 classes:
class Player {
public:
virtual func1();
[code]....
Say in my main class, I have a function fight(Player p1, Player p2) and I would like to do something like this in the fight function, given that p1 is the human and p2 is the computer:
//function fight()
fight(Player p1, Player p2) {
p1.func2();
}
//using function fight()
fight(human, computer);
When I compile the program, I got this: error: ‘class Player’ has no member named 'func2()' What can I do to allow p1 to call func2 inside fight()? I'm not allowed to use pointers as the parameter for fight() and have to use the signature fight(Player p1, Player p2).
I'm trying to call a function on a derived class that's in a vector of it's base class. I've made the code really simple for illustration purposes:
class Sprite {
virtual void update();
}
class Enemy : public Sprite {
virtual void update();
[Code] ....
I want to be able to just call update() on the items in the vector and the derived class update() functions be called. Currently, it always calls the Sprite update, which makes sense, but it's not what I want. Is there a way to call the derived update function without knowing the type of the derived class?
I have the following problem: I am using NLOpt for optimization. The API provides functions to set the objective. This is done as follows:
double objective(const vector<double> &x, vector<double> &grad, void *data)
{
return x[1]*x[0];
}
int main(){
nlopt::opt opti(nlopt::LD_MMA,2);
opti.set_min_objective(objective,NULL);
vector<double> x(2);
[Code]....
Now I want to make the function objective a member of a class:
class Foo {
public:
double objective(...){..}
};
How can I give this method to opti.optimize? If I make objective static I can use
opti.optimize(Foo::objective,NULL);
but I do not want to have a static member. Is it possible to create an object of type Foo and give it to opti.optimize?
I have a class Calendar which has an attribute of priority queue, that accepts records of structure defined as:
typedef void (Calendar::*eventPointer)();
struct activationRecord {
double Time;
int Priority;
eventPointer activationEvent;
};
And here is the problem. Whole day I've been trying to fill the Calendar with some test entries by calling the method
void Calendar::calendarPush(double Time, int Priority, eventPointer event)
This is how I call it
calendar.calendarPush(Time, Priority, &Calendar::calendarEmpty);
But Visual Studio keeps to warn me with this error
argument of type "bool (Calendar::*)()" is incompatible with parameter of type "eventPointer *"
#include <iostream>
#include "Calendar.h"
using namespace std;
int main() {
cout << "Initializing ..." << endl;
double Time = 0.0;
int Priority = 0;
[Code] ....
I need understanding this block of code, particularly this line : *getLeftChild() { return this - _child; }
Code:
public class UpperNode {
BOX _box;
int _child;
FORCEINLINE UpperNode *getLeftChild() { return this - _child; }
...
};
Here I have this function:
Code:
void
UpperNode::visulization(int level) {
if (isLeaf())
_box.visulization();
else
if ((level > 0)) {
[Code] .....
It also makes calls for "getLeftChild()";
But I see that getLeftChild expects function pointer, and I absolutely have no clue where "this" comes from inside function body.
(return this - _child) - "this" has to be integer.
Or, if we gave pointer, and "this" is referring to some UpperNode, then I can't understand to which one, I have no UpperNode array defined or something. So if this functions is actually scaling pointer address, then scaling where to? I could comprehend it, if I had some array of UpperNodes, but not just class. I have UpperNodes array defined in other friendly class, but don't think they are related .....
I'm currently programming a server which uses multiple threads- I have a class for one map in the game. Each map has a thread for timed events(tile regeneration, NPC regeneration, etc.), and a thread for handling NPCs(movement, combat, etc.). A basic structure of the class looks like this:
class Region {
public:
/* game values are here, they are public so
they can be accessed from outside of the class
inside of packet-handling functions and such */
int value;
void *Function();
[Code] ....
The program crashes when I use a member of the same class the function is located in- in the context I have shown about it would crash on "value++".
Let's look at this simplified code, it gives compilation error
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
class A {
public:
void showInfo() { cout << " This is an instance of A" << endl; }
[Code] ....
Without using pointer, how to make this works?
I have in the past written code for templated functions where one function argument can be either a function pointer or a Functor. Works pretty straightforward.
Now I am in a situation where I am actually trying to pass a function pointer as template argument to a class. Unfortunately this does not work, I can pass the Functor class but not the function pointer. Below code illustrates the issue:
Code:
#include <string>
#include <iostream>
#include <sstream>
#include <cstdlib>
// For demonstration
const char * external_library_call() {
return "FFFF";
[Code] .....
The idea is to have the definition of the Record class simple and readable and have a maintainable way to add auto-conversion functions to the class. So the lines I commented out are the desirable way how I want my code to look. Unfortunately I could not come up with any way that was close to readable for solving this.
Let's say we have a custom Vector class and I need to know which of the following is considered to be more efficient and why of course.
Vector Vector::operator+(const Vector &b) const {
return Vector(x+b.x,y+b.y);
}
Vector Vector::operator+(const Vector &b) const {
Vector tmp(x+b.x,y+b.y);
return tmp;
}
I'm having some difficulties in understanding the topic which I stated above.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI create an instance of a base class (not derived class) and assign it to base class pointer. Then, I convert it to a pointer to a derived class and call methods on it.
why does it work, if there is a virtual table?
when will it fail?
// TestCastWin.cpp : Defines the entry point for the console application.//
#include "stdafx.h"
#include <iostream>
class B
{
public:
B(double x, double y) : x_(x), y_(y) {}
double x() const { return x_; }
[Code] ....
When we want to use custom classes for the STL set data structure, how to do it?
I look around and see people passing comparators, overloading operator(), and also overloading operator< in the class itself.
Which one's the idiomatic c++ way?
I am currently working on a custom "Array" class for a project, and I have run into an error I don't quite understand the source of. The relevant code is as follows:
template<typename T> class Array {
private:
T errValCopy;
public:
T __errVal__;
uint16 __size__;
T* __ptr__;
Array(const T& errorValue);
[Code] ....
When I try to run the following code:
Array<Array<int>> a(Array<int>(-1));
The error log tells me there is no appropriate default constructor available. If I understand it correctly, "default constructor" refers to the constructor which lets you just write Array<int> a; instead of Array<int> a(...);, but I can't see where in the code such a situation occurs...
I have made a custom class matrices class which allows me to add, multiply, subtract (etc.) matrices. I have the following method for multiplication but I get an error that says
'invalid use of 'this' outside of a non-static member function'
How can I refer to the current instance without getting this error.
void operator *(Matrices& matrix2) {
this.multiplyMatrix(matrix2);
}
I know what are pointer's and how to use them but there is one point i am not able to understand. Below is the example code
I understand everything in the below code except 1 thing why i am using pointer to base class object in vector int the main() Function?
Code:
#include <iostream>
#include <sstream>
#include <string>
#include <vector>
using namespace std;
// base class
[Code] ...
Here is the lines of code i want to understand.
Code:
vector<Employee*> employees;
employees.push_back(&emp1);
employees.push_back(&mgr1);
I know if i will not use the pointer base class function "virtual double grossPay" will be called for both base class object and derived class object and when i will use pointer with reference to the object because base class function is virtual it will look for same function in derived class and if available it will execute it.
I attempted to create a dynamic array class for use in my engine (due to problems regarding a dll-interface with the standard library), so I tried at making a standard-compatible allocator template class first. After I "finished" that, I went on to work on the dynamic array class itself.So I finish the dynamic array class, and test it with the standard allocator. It works perfectly, but when I test it with my custom allocator class, it fails terribly.
To make sure it wasn't my DynamicArray class that was causing issues, I tried using the custom allocator on the std::vector class template, and it didn't work either. IMy DynamicArray class code:
// Represents a dynamic array, similar to the standard library's "vector" class.
template<typename T, typename A>
class DynamicArray
{
public:
DynamicArray() :
data(nullptr),
elements(0),
capacity(0)
[code].....
The "Request" and "Free" functions are my engine's equivalent of malloc and free (or new and delete). I allocate a large buffer (16 mb), and through those functions I distribute the memory to where it's needed.
I have a class like this:
#include <string>
using namespace std;
//-----------------------------------------------
class Prenumeratorius {
private:
string pavarde;
string adresas;
string leidinioKodas;
[code]....
bunch of variables, constructor, setter and getter.And I have this class:
#include <vector>
class Leidinys {
private:
string kodas;
string pavadinimas;
double vienetoKaina;
[code]....
in to my "Leidinys.h" header file, I get a build error, I tried to remove same includes in both files, that didn't worked.
There are, or course, better ways to do this, but I need to stick to some rules:
(1) Use only pointer variables and not arrays or structs.
(2) Use the three functions shown--regardless of easier methods.
The program should ask for some input, operate on those numbers, and then display the results. I know I am confused over these things:
(1) All that syntax using '*' and '&' or neither.
(2) How to use the char type correctly.
(3) How to use a char type input as an operator (a + b).
(4) How to use the pointer of the operator variable (+,-,*,/) in an actual equation.
Code:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
// *** Prototype Functions ***
void Post_Results (float*);
void Calculate (float*, float*, char*, float*);
void Get_Numbers (float*, char*, float*);
[Code]......
I created a simple program to understand it
class TestClass {
private int x = 10;
TestClass a = new TestClass();
[Code].....
I know this is recursion but how do the compiler do this? How can it call itself when it hasnt even completed initializing every object it has? Why do VS allow this?
I'm trying to make a windows-focused , I will make it portable after , audio function that plays sounds according to my midi file. I know there is playsound, but it's not what I desire. I'm curious if Beep plays through the sound card or is similar to printf("a") ? I'm just looking for a low level solution.
View 1 Replies View Related