I'm quite new to openMP, mostly used pthreads and mpi before. Now I like to tinker a bit with openMP, but haven't found any good docs, reference list or similar.
What's the equivalent to pthread's mutex lock in openMP?
Code:
#pragma omp parallel for
for(i=0; i<n ; i++){
// Do something intelligent...
// If needed handle a shared variable.
}
How do I protect the shared variable?
I'm looking to translate say the standard code for 4 which is 52 to the integer 4 is that possible with a build in function i C?
View 5 Replies View RelatedHow translate char array from "MS-DOS Codepage 866" (Russian code) to Unicode?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI am working on the producer-consumer problem and am mostly happy with what I have except for one remaining issue. I am using pthreads for consumers and producers on a FIFO, and synchronizing using a combination of semaphores and mutexes. Things seem to work fine, except that my consumers seem unable to tell when there may be more data coming into the FIFO.
I need to be able to determine not just when the FIFO is empty (it gets emptied every time a consumer thread runs) but when ALL producers have detached from it - that's when my consumers should pthread_exit, and not before that. I have read conflicting information on how FIFOs work in terms of EOF and have been unable to get it working.
(NOTE: that's what I *think* the problem is... It's my first time working with pthreads, so there may be other issues I am not even aware of).
In any case, my code is below. I am running it on a Linux VM on top of Windows, if that makes any difference. It takes 3 command line parameters - FIFO name (will be created if doesn't exist), number of producers, and number of consumers.
Code:
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <semaphore.h>
[Code].....
I am trying to emulate callback mechanism in C. The code I have is follows:
Code:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <pthread.h>
struct fopen_struct {
char *filename;
char *mode;
void *(*callback) (FILE *);
[Code] .....
If I do a pthread_join in fopen_t() it works perfectly fine. But if I do that in main() I get a segmentation fault error. I want to call it in main() because I want it to be non-blocking, is there any solution?
I am doing Histogram using pthreads and after long struggle on it.. finally it says 'Segmentation Fault (Core Dumped)'. I knew that error means something somewhere I am accessing to a wrong memory location.
Here is my code..
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <pthread.h>
void Usage(char prog_name[]);
void Gen_data(void *p);
void Gen_bins(void *p);
int Which_bin(void *p);
void Print_histo(void *p);
[Code] ...
How to fix 'Segmentation Fault (Core Dumped)'?
I have a problem: solve the system of equations by the Gauss-Jordan methods with pthreads. I have a big matrix A (for example 2000x2000), so i must solve Ax = b. Before I devide matrix to number of threads and each thread must work only with his peace of matrix.
Code:
#include <iostream>
#include "synchronize.h"
#include <pthread.h>
using namespace std;
typedef struct _ARGS {
int thread_count;
int thread_number;
[Code] .....
I write it on Ubuntu, and when I compile [g++ main.cpp -o main -lpthread -lm] the it works good(for example, if in 1 thread I get time_of_working = 10 sec, on 2 threads time_of_working = 5.4, i.e. about 2 times faster ), if I compile like this [g++ main.cpp -o main -lpthread -lm -O3] it is only 1.2-1.3 times faster.
I wrote code that finds the number of prime numbers in a range entered by the user. Now I'm attempting to make it run in parallel with the number of threads I assign it to have. I'm using blocking technique, so I'm assigning, in this scenario, 4 threads - 1/4 of the numbers in the range to the first array, and the next 1/4 of the numbers in the range to the next array and so on. Then I want to execute the prime number counting code in parallel. I'm using openMP to do this. I'm having difficulty setting it all up properly. I have a little experience with pthreads but little with openMP and am struggling in how this should be done.
Code:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <omp.h>
[Code]....
I am using map for assigning an identifiers for a line from file in c++. Also i am using IDs for a pattern in line {name, operator, val} which is separated by ';'. I am using read_pub() for calculating how many patterns are there in a line.
#include<stdio.h>
#include<stdlib.h>
#include<iostream>
#include<fstream>
#include<omp.h>
#include<map>
#include <sstream>
using namespace std;
struct predicate {
[Code] ....
I'm trying to write a small brute force application in C on Ubuntu 14.04.1 using Code::Blocks with gcc-4.8.2. It's nothing special and just for practice.The focus is on a parallel procedure that generates strings by use of OpenMP. Every time a string is generated, the counter variable should be incremented. At the end, regardless of whether the search string was matched or not, it outputs the correct number of all generated strings (counts).It works fine so far.Here is my source code example:
Code:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <omp.h>
/* Global variables */
const char Literals[] = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz";
const int NLiterals = sizeof( Literals ) - 1; // NLiterals = 26 Bytes.
const char SearchString[] = "test"; // I.e. until 'test' there are 355414 counts.
char MatchString[16];
}
[code]...
This should speed up the process of generating strings. But if I do so, always when the program has a match the number of counted strings is wrong. Here are some possible "wrong" outputs: Code: Match: 'test'! 40710 tries. <-- number of tries (counts) is wrong! or Code: Match: 'test'! 40375 tries. <-- number of tries (counts) is wrong! But if the program doesn't have a match (i.e. when I change SearchString to something like the following line), then the number of counts is correct: Code: const char SearchString[] = "test0"; The only thing I have to do before, is to change the follow line from:
Code:
printf( "
No match! %u tries.
", Count / 8 ); to Code: printf( "
No match! %u tries.
", Count );
But also it can happen that there is no output. Like an infinite or endless loop. How can I improve the source code in order that the correct number of counts is always displayed and what can be the reason for the endless loops time after time? Both issues appears only by the use of Code: #pragma omp for schedule( dynamic ).
I'm trying to implement Parallel loop with OpenMP. I just googled and got the below sample, but it seems its not executing parallely. It takes same amount time for code which is with parallel and without parallel.
Without Parallel : It takes 39 secs.
-----------------
for (int I=0;I<100000;I++){
cout<<I<<" ";
}
With Parallel : It takes 39 secs.
--------------
#include<omp.h>
#pragma omp parallel {
#pragma omp for
for (int I=0;I<100000;I++) {
cout<<I<<endl;
}
}
Why parallel is not working and it takes same time. My machine is Dual Core.
Is there a way of knowing which indices a thread is assigned in a parallel openMP scope?
View 6 Replies View RelatedI recently picked up multithreading with OpenMP, so it is still new to me. While processing data, I would like to store it in a vector, as shown here:
vector<int> vect;
#pragma omp parallel for
for(int c=0; c<500; ++c) {
vect.push_back(c)
}
However, since it is multithreaded, I would like (and need!) to have one dedicated vector per thread. I haven't been able to find an example of how to do this online. Is it even possible?
I'm trying to optimize this code using openMP. The line I added made it run about twice as fast but I'm trying to figure out how to make it even faster. Could reshaping the loops potentially increase the speed?
//4 threads
int listsize=15000;
#pragma omp parallel for shared(f) private(i,j,hash)
for(i = 0; i < listsize; i++) {
printf("Thread: %d i: %zu wl_size: %zu
",omp_get_thread_num(),i,wl_size);
for (j = 0; j < num; j++) {
h = f[j] (getw(list, i));
c[h] = 1;
} }
I am trying to parallelize some of my code with OpenMP. When I switch to using multiple threads I start getting random numbers that are out of the expected range.
Here is a small example:
Code:
#include <stdio.h>
#include </usr/local/include/gsl/gsl_rng.h>
#include </usr/local/include/gsl/gsl_randist.h>
int main() {
int mySeed=0;
const gsl_rng_type *T;
T = gsl_rng_ranlxs2;
gsl_rng *r_1 ;
[Code] .....
gsl_rng_uniform should only output number in the range [0,1) but with multiple threads it outputs larger number as well.
I'm working on this program that I have to design a class Numbers that can be used to translate whole numbers to the English description of the number.
Now this is what I got so far:
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
using namespace std;
class Numbers {
private:
int number;
static string ones[];
static string tens[];
[Code] ....
The program seems to work. However its not giving me the right number description,
Example:
Please enter the amount you would like translated into words: 5
six dollars
please enter another number: 10
eleven dollars
please enter another number: 20
thirty dollars
please enter another number: 30
forty dollars
please enter another number: 100
two hundred dollars
please enter another number: 150
two hundred sixty dollars
please enter another number: 500
six hundred dollars
please enter another number: 1000
two thousand dollars
please enter another number: