This is in response to the bubble sort and selection sorts for linked lists. On my system, (Intel 2600K, 3.4ghz), it sorts a list with 4,194,304 nodes containing 64 bit unsigned integers in about 1.05 seconds.
Code: #define NUMLISTS 32 /* number of lists */ typedef unsigned long long UI64; typedef struct NODE_{ struct NODE_ * next; UI64 data;
I've written code for a selection sort algorithm to sort through a singly linked list, However, it only brings the smallest node to the front, but doesnt swap positions of any of the remaining nodes, even though they are not in order.
Code: /* Mergesort: Use merge() to sort an array of size n */ #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> void mergesort(int key[], int n) { int j, k, m, *w; for (m = 1; m < n; m *= 2)
[Code] .....
Question : Modify mergesort() so that it can be used with an array of any size, not just with a size that is a power of two. Recall that any positive integer can be expressed as a sum of powers of two. For example,
27 = 16 + 8 + 2 + 1
Consider the array as a collection of subarrays of sizes that are powers of two. Sort the subarrays and then use merge() to produce the final sorted array.
I tried so many algorithms and all failed!! What i dont know is how to create subarrays ?
I'm trying to write a function that takes two linked lists and creates a third one with only the common elements.
It assumes the first list (the caller) has no dups, but it doesn't seem to be working. The program doesn't crash, it just hangs when it is supposed to display L3 (the third list)..everything else runs and is displayed fine.
I tried to keep the coding style as similar as possible. I tested these with 4 million (4x1024x1024) 64 bit unsigned integers, Visual Studio 2005, 64 bit mode, Win XP X64, Intel 2600K 3.4ghz cpu. The average time for top down = 3.7 seconds, bottom up = 3.5 seconds.
Code: // tsorttd.h - top down merge sort template <class T> T * TopDownMergeSort(T a[], T b[], size_t n) { TopDownMergeSortAtoA(a, b, 0, n);
Code: typedef vector<int> LIST; // LIST can be a vector of any comparable type static LIST merge_sort(LIST &linp){ size_t i, width; LIST lout(linp.size()); // second list for output
I'm trying to implement the Merge-Sort algorithm. I only had the pseudocode for it and have some problems coding this into C.
I have only covered pointers recently and I tried using them, which did not work. I started with the code for the merge algorithm and only used a 10 element array, which was already divided into two sorted subarrays:
Code: #include <stdio.h>#include <stdlib.h> int main() { int a[5]={1,5,6,10,13}, b[5]={4,8,9,10,14},c[10], *i,*j,k;
[Code].....
This is the result that I get:
Code: 1 4 5 6 8 9 10 10 13 0
So I think the problem occurs because in the second to last loop i is incremented again, but the end of the array is already reached, and the compiler has no element a[6] to compare with *j in the last run of the loop. Is there generally a better way to implement Merge?
// mergefile2norecreation.cpp : definisce il punto di ingresso dell'applicazione console. // // Filemerge.cpp : definisce il punto di ingresso dell'applicazione console. //
#include "stdafx.h" int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[]) {
There is a smart way to make a merge sort between 2 file already ordered? I had try it ,and above there is my result,it works but i think that it's possible to do it in a smart way...
I am looking for a function or algorithm to best merge and sort similar content between two lists of unordered strings each in individual files (very large files ~200mb each).
For example, these files have a common first string and are merged based on them:
File 1: red, apple green, truck blue, car yellow, ball orange, candy
File 2:
gold, necklace green, tree yellow, sticker blue, water red, bag
I am looking for the following output:
Output:
red, apple, bag green, truck, tree blue, car, water yellow, ball, sticker orange, candy gold, necklace
I would like to place the first column in one array and second in another. I am using the merge sort and merge algorithm from my book to sort the first column (x-coord) in descending order and the second column (y-coord) in ascending order. The output would look like this.
I am ignoring the where(line number) for now. The error I get is: cannot convert 'points_struct*' to 'int*' for argument '1' to 'int mergesort(int*, int, int)'.
So my question is how to get my points_struct arrays to work with the algorithm I have from book. Here is what I have so far.
#include<iostream> #include<fstream> using namespace std;
I have created a program that first sorts a series of numbers that are input dynamically then an option is given to either use a sequential search or a Binary search. my sequential search works fine but the merge sort coupled with the binary search has a small bug that I just can't seem to figure how to eliminate. I first used my own merge sort but it was really in efficient so a I took a more efficient example and incorporated it in my program but I cant seem to get rid of this bug I'm dealing with. and it seems to be causing a further problem with the Binary seach.
Code: #include <iostream> #include <cmath> using namespace std; const int N = 10;
I'm trying to write a code that takes two arrays from the user (presumably in ascending order) and then passes the sizes of both arrays and a pointer to each to a separate "int* mergeArrays" function that will merge sort the two. I've written a lot of the code, but I can't get it to compile. I get errors: lab6.c: In function "main":
lab6.c:31:14: error: expected expression before "int" mergeArrays(int* firstArray, int size1, int* secondArray, int size2); ^ lab6.c:31:14: error: too few arguments to function "mergeArrays"
Whenever I try to call merge sort on large numbers say n=10000000. It gives an error. It works fine for small numbers, even though I have declared my Lists on the heap.
I've implemented the merge sort algorithm and used the 'merge' part for counting the number of split-inversions in an array as part of an assignment for an online course. How ever, the out put array is not a sorted version of the input array and as a result the number of split inversions obtained is wrong. I think that there is some thing wrong in the way I am indexing arrays.
I've used ' cout ' to print the values of indexes to see exactly what values are being passed in during the recursions.
Code:
#include <iostream> using namespace std; int length=0,mid=0,inv=0; void mergesort(int arr[], int first, int last) { cout << "first: " << first << " " << "last: " << last; cout << endl;